agentsclimarketplace

Vault lint

Skill markphelps/agent-plugins/vault/skills/vault-lint

My AI Agent Plugins. There are many like these but these are mine.

Install
npx -y skills add markphelps/agent-plugins --skill vault-lint

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Hygiene pass over active notes, ideas, and projects

SKILL.md

7.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Lint Vault

Run a focused hygiene pass over active vault surface and propose fixes.

Portent reference: ../references/portent-knowledge-base-spec.md.

Recency Priority

Work the active surface newest-first, ranked by each object's updated frontmatter date (fall back to file modification time when updated is absent). Concentrate scrutiny on the freshest material — recently-touched objects are where active thinking lives and where new mismatches, overlaps, and gaps appear. Long-untouched objects are assumed settled and rank lower, but are never excluded: they remain valid link targets, merge destinations, and canonical homes, and still get a structural check (broken links, orphaning).

For this pass, order the issue list newest-first: a fresh file's issue outranks an older file's equivalent issue when reporting and when choosing what to apply.

Parameters

  • --scope notes|projects|all (default: all)
  • --mode report|apply (default: report)

Checks

  • Orphan pages: No inbound links from active surface
  • Stale pages: updated date threshold + topic inactivity
  • Contradictions: Conflicting claims across related notes
  • Broken/ambiguous wikilinks: Invalid or unclear [[links]]
  • Connection candidates: Notes that should be linked to strengthen the knowledge graph over time
  • Missing concepts: Repeated themes without canonical page
  • Mismatched states: Project directory location vs Portent metadata and active navigation
  • Merge candidates: Duplicate or overlapping notes, ideas, or projects that should probably be one durable item
  • Unbacked synthesis: Summaries or briefs without links to complete archived source records
  • External tag drift: Clipped source notes missing external, or owned notes incorrectly tagged external
  • Portent object validity: missing title, invalid type, invalid status, malformed belongs_to, malformed related_to
  • Organized-without-usefulness: status: organized objects without any relationship when a Project, Responsibility, Operation, or Topic target is obvious
  • Archive visibility drift: status: archived objects still shown in active index.md views
  • Folder/metadata mismatch: folder location contradicts type, status, or stage; treat as a navigation smell, not automatic truth
  • Custom model drift: custom types or custom relationships that duplicate Portent defaults

Scope

  • notes/, ideas/, and projects/ by default (exclude archive/ unless explicitly requested)
  • Does NOT move files (use vault-tracker for lifecycle changes)
  • Does NOT delete content
  • Does NOT merge files automatically; proposes merge plans for review
  • Does NOT add speculative graph links; only high-confidence links are applied

Workflow

  1. Scan scoped directories and build issue list with file references.
  2. Classify by severity: info, warning, critical.
  3. In report mode: list issues and proposed fixes only.
  4. In apply mode: fix link issues, flag decisions needing manual review.
  5. Find connection candidates:
    • unlinked notes sharing a named project, idea, concept, source, or decision
    • notes that explicitly mention another note title or alias without a wikilink
    • external source records that support a project, idea, or concept
    • orphan pages with an obvious parent, project, concept, or resource
  6. In apply mode: add high-confidence contextual links and backlinks.
  7. Call out concept-promotion candidates (themes appearing 3+ times).
  8. Report idea lifecycle issues:
    • duplicate ideas across fleeting/, incubating/, someday/, rejected/
    • stale incubating ideas without next action
    • project-like ideas that may need lifecycle promotion
  9. Report merge candidates:
    • exact duplicates or near-duplicates
    • continuation notes that extend the same idea/project
    • split notes whose boundaries are accidental rather than useful
  10. Report summaries or research briefs that do not cite complete sources under raw/processed/YYYY-MM-DD/.
  11. Report tag issues:
  • likely clipped/source notes missing external
  • owned ideas, project drafts, or plans incorrectly tagged external
  1. Report mismatched project states for lifecycle handling.
  2. Summarize outcomes.

Connection Candidate Rubric

Add links to build the knowledge graph when the relationship is concrete and useful for future navigation.

  • High confidence: direct title/alias mention, shared source URL, explicit parent/child relation, project material linked to its project, research source supporting a specific project/idea/concept, or concept page named by the note.
  • Medium confidence: strong topical overlap or recurring phrase, but the relationship label is unclear.
  • Low confidence: same broad domain, weak semantic similarity, or link would be decorative.

Apply-mode link additions must be contextual: add the wikilink near the relevant claim, heading, source, or Related section. If no natural location exists, report the candidate instead of forcing a link.

Prefer linking over merging when notes are related but distinct. Prefer concept links over many point-to-point links when a concept page is the better hub.

Merge Candidate Rubric

  • High confidence: same title/slug, same source URL, same project or idea identity, or one note explicitly says it continues another.
  • Medium confidence: heavy topical overlap with compatible claims, but uncertain destination or lifecycle state.
  • Low confidence: same broad area but distinct decisions, audiences, or implementation paths.

High-confidence candidates may be passed to vault-ingest, vault-tracker, or vault-concepts for apply-mode merging. Medium/low candidates should stay as separate notes with proposed links.

Portent Apply Constraints

In apply mode, Portent fixes are limited to mechanical corrections:

  • normalize valid scalar/list YAML shapes
  • add missing title from H1 when exact
  • add status: organized only when type and relationships are already clear
  • add high-confidence related_to links where the object explicitly names the target

Do not infer broad relationships or change object type in apply mode unless the user explicitly requested that conversion.

Safety

  • Report-first by default on all ambiguous issues.
  • Never delete content or move files.
  • Never collapse distinct ideas just because they share keywords.
  • Never add links based only on keyword overlap.
  • Never modify raw/, processed/, or assets/.
  • Exclude archive/ from automatic scans.

Output

Return:

  • Issue list with severity and file references
  • Fixes applied (link corrections only)
  • Decisions requiring manual review
  • Concept promotion candidates
  • Connection candidates and links added
  • Mismatched project lifecycle states
  • Idea lifecycle issues and duplicate idea candidates
  • Merge candidates with target, confidence, and rationale
  • Synthesis notes missing archived source links
  • External tag drift findings
  • Portent object validity, relationship, archive visibility, and custom model drift findings

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.