agentsclimarketplace

Vault ingest

Skill markphelps/agent-plugins/skills/vault-ingest

My AI Agent Plugins. There are many like these but these are mine.

Install
npx -y skills add markphelps/agent-plugins --skill vault-ingest

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

10.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Vault Ingest

Categorize captures in raw/sources/, route owned/user-authored material to the right vault directories, and synthesize tagged external sources into curated notes while preserving complete source evidence.

Portent reference: ../references/portent-knowledge-base-spec.md.

Parameters

  • --mode report|apply (default: report)
    • report: preview all planned operations
    • apply: execute confirmed operations
  • --path PATH (optional): override default ./raw/sources input path

Core Contract

For each ingestion cycle:

  • Source starts in raw/sources/ (unprocessed inbox)
  • The source file itself remains the durable artifact
  • Each source is classified by intent, topic, and lifecycle state before moving
  • Every capture is classified into a Portent lifecycle state first: captured, organized, or archived
  • Every organized durable object gets a Portent type
  • Every organized object should have enough relationship metadata to explain future usefulness:
    • belongs_to for primary context when one exists
    • related_to for secondary associations
  • If a capture cannot attach to a Project, Responsibility, Operation, or Topic, leave it in raw/sources/ and report it as a delete/ignore candidate
  • Source files move to the most specific existing vault location when they are owned/user-authored material or working source records
  • Owned notes, project ideas, drafts, and planning captures are moved intact rather than summarized
  • Notes tagged external are browser-clipped or imported external sources and should be synthesized during apply-mode processing unless the user explicitly requests routing only
  • When a capture duplicates or extends an existing note, idea, project, or resource, merge it into that destination when confidence is high
  • Any source that is summarized or synthesized must keep a complete immutable copy in raw/processed/YYYY-MM-DD/
  • Summaries or synthesized research briefs must link to the archived complete source record
  • Navigation is updated only for moved durable files that belong in active navigation
  • All material operations are logged in log.md
  • raw/processed/ is audited for empty folders and anomalies

Routing Rules

Prefer the vault's existing directory taxonomy. Do not invent new top-level folders when an existing one fits.

Source categoryDestination pattern
Rough owned ideaideas/fleeting/<idea>/
Promising project ideaideas/incubating/<idea>/
Later/someday ideaideas/someday/<idea>/ or the closest existing idea
Rejected/closed ideaideas/rejected/<idea>/
Active project materialprojects/active/<project>/
Durable conceptual notenotes/concepts/ only when it is itself canonical
General durable notenotes/<topic>/ or the closest existing note area
external referenceArchive source in raw/processed/YYYY-MM-DD/; write synthesis to notes/<topic>/
Asset or binary supportraw/assets/ or an existing asset folder
No clear durable homeLeave in raw/sources/ and report the ambiguity

When an owned/user-authored source clearly belongs with an existing project, idea, or note, move it there even if the file is messy. Preserve the original content and filename unless a minimal rename is needed to avoid collision or clarify the source identity.

Merge Rules

Prefer a single durable note or folder when multiple captures are clearly about the same thing. Merge only when the relationship is obvious: same project, same idea, same source, same canonical concept, or one file is a direct continuation of another.

  • In report mode, propose merge target, evidence, confidence, and link rewrites.
  • In apply mode, merge high-confidence captures into the existing durable destination.
  • Preserve all user-authored content. Move unmatched sections under clear headings instead of summarizing them away.
  • Keep provenance by retaining source filename, capture date, or a backlink to the moved/merged file.
  • When confidence is medium or low, route the file beside the likely target and report a manual merge decision instead of merging.
  • Do not merge merely related but distinct ideas; link them instead.

Capture Decision

Use raw/sources/ only for unclassified captures. If the user already identifies the item as their own idea, route it to ideas/ directly:

  • ideas/fleeting/: quick idea, fragment, or unqualified possibility
  • ideas/incubating/: idea with enough shape to revisit or develop
  • ideas/someday/: intentionally parked idea
  • ideas/rejected/: idea explicitly declined but worth retaining as history

External articles, discussions, docs, and market references captured with Obsidian Note Clipper should carry an external tag. That tag tells ingestion the note came from an outside source and should be synthesized by default while preserving the complete clipped note.

X bookmark source records are captured by vault-x-bookmarks. If the task is to delete irrelevant, minimal, or low-value bookmark captures from raw/sources/, use vault-x-bookmarks prune mode instead of ingest. Ingest routes sources worth keeping; it does not judge bookmark source value for deletion.

Recognize external in either common Obsidian form:

  • frontmatter list or scalar: tags: [external], tags: external
  • inline tag: #external

Copy vs Synthesize Decision

Default to moving or merging owned/user-authored sources intact. Default to synthesizing tagged external sources during apply-mode processing. Synthesize untagged sources only when the user explicitly asks to summarize/synthesize a specific source.

Plain copy/move/merge is correct when:

  • The file is user-authored, an owned idea, a project draft, a plan, meeting note, scratch note, or decision record
  • The note's wording, structure, or roughness is itself useful context
  • The capture is short enough that summarizing would mainly discard nuance
  • The user asks to organize, categorize, move, link, or merge

Synthesis is correct when:

  • The note has an external tag from Obsidian Note Clipper or another external capture path
  • The user explicitly asks for synthesis, summary, takeaways, assessment, comparison, or research
  • Multiple external sources need to be combined into a brief

When synthesis happens, first move the complete source under raw/processed/YYYY-MM-DD/, then write the synthesis with links to those archived source records. The synthesis should live in the most specific curated destination, such as notes/<topic>/, projects/.../research/, or ideas/.../research/. The archived complete source is the immutable citation target.

Workflow

  1. Scan raw/sources/ for unprocessed captures (skip hidden files)
  2. Classify each capture:
    • Identify whether it is PORT (Project, Operation, Responsibility, Task) or ENTP (Event, Note, Topic, Person)
    • Assign status: captured|organized|archived
    • Identify source origin: owned, external, asset, operational record
    • Identify primary belongs_to candidate
    • Identify useful related_to candidates
    • Match against existing projects/, ideas/, notes/, and indexed Topic objects
    • Mark confidence as high, medium, or low
  3. Plan moves:
    • Choose the most specific destination path
    • Detect filename collisions and propose minimal safe renames
    • Detect duplicate or continuation captures and propose merge targets
    • Check for the external tag and plan archive + synthesis by default
    • Leave low-confidence items in place and list the decision needed
  4. Move, merge, or synthesize high-confidence sources:
    • Move owned/user-authored sources intact to their destination paths
    • Archive tagged external sources under raw/processed/YYYY-MM-DD/
    • Write curated synthesis notes that link to the archived complete sources
  5. Update navigation and ops trail only as needed:
    • Add moved durable files to index.md when they belong in active navigation
    • Rewrite links for merged files when a canonical destination replaces them
    • Append concise operation entry to log.md
  6. Audit processed archives:
    • Scan raw/processed/YYYY-MM-DD/ for empty date folders
    • Flag non-date folder anomalies
    • Report duplicate filenames across dates
    • Remove empty folders (with confirmation in apply mode)
  7. Execute by mode:
    • report: preview plan only (no changes)
    • apply: run full pipeline with confirmation

Safety

  • Never discard files from raw/sources/ — only move them after successful classification
  • Treat raw/processed/ as immutable evidence — never delete processed source files
  • Do not create summaries, synthesized notes, or rewritten interpretations of owned source files during ingest
  • Synthesize tagged external sources by default in apply mode, preserving the complete source under raw/processed/YYYY-MM-DD/ first
  • Do not synthesize untagged sources unless the user explicitly asks for it
  • Do not remove the external tag from archived source records
  • Non-destructive edits by default — source files are moved, not rewritten
  • Merges are additive by default and must preserve provenance
  • Confirm before execution unless --yes
  • Do not mutate file contents under raw/sources/, raw/processed/, or raw/assets/
  • Do not assume or create an inbox staging layer

Output

Return:

  • discovered captures and classification plan
  • Portent type, status, belongs_to, and related_to recommendations for each capture
  • category, confidence, and destination path for each source
  • source files moved and final destination paths
  • files merged, merge target, and provenance retained
  • synthesized items, archived complete source paths, and links inserted
  • source files left in place with ambiguity reason
  • captures left unorganized because they lack a useful relationship target
  • index.md additions
  • log.md entry appended
  • audit findings (empty folders, anomalies)
  • fixes applied (if any)
  • manual follow-up items

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.