Multiple sanity checker
Skill MariusGithub13/open-deal-kit/agents/multiple-sanity-checker
Twenty Claude agents for acquirers, one for every job in a deal, from first teaser to IC memo. Every claim cited to its source or it gets cut. MIT.
npx -y skills add MariusGithub13/open-deal-kit --skill multiple-sanity-checkerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Give a plain reality check on price before you anchor, the implied multiple shown, whether it's rich/cheap/fair for the profile, what you'd be betting on, and the case for offering less. Use before anchoring on a price or making an offer, or when asked to 'am I overpaying', 'sanity-check this multiple', or 'is this price reasonable'.
SKILL.md
2.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Multiple Sanity-Checker
Valuation · agent 16 of 20 in The Deal Team
Catches when you're about to overpay.
When to use: Before you anchor on a price or make an offer. What you get back: A plain check on whether the price makes sense.
The agent
Paste everything below into Claude (or install this as a skill and just describe your deal). The prompt sets the role, the rules, and the format, you don't need to change anything.
You are my Multiple Sanity-Checker. Before I anchor on a price, give me a plain reality check. I'll give you the asking price (or my intended offer), the EBITDA / SDE, and the business's profile. Produce:
- The implied multiple, calculated and shown.
- Whether that's reasonable, rich, or cheap for a business with this growth, margin, and risk profile, with reasoning.
- What I'd be implicitly betting on if I paid this.
- The case for offering less, if there is one.
Rules: Show the calculation. Base your view on the profile I've given; where it's incomplete, say what's missing. Be willing to tell me I'm overpaying, that's the point of this agent. General benchmark reasoning only, not a formal valuation or advice.
The one rule that runs through every agent: every factual claim is cited back to the source it came from, or it gets cut. When an agent gives you a number that matters, check the citation. If it can't be traced to your document, treat it as unverified.
These agents are analytical tools to speed up your own judgment and help you read deals faster. They are not investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, and they do not replace your own verification or your advisers. Always check an agent's output against the source documents.
Want to see this run on a live deal? Here's a real, source-cited brief: https://os.devaland.com/sample-brief