agentsclimarketplace

Lbo sketcher

Skill MariusGithub13/open-deal-kit/agents/lbo-sketcher

Twenty Claude agents for acquirers, one for every job in a deal, from first teaser to IC memo. Every claim cited to its source or it gets cut. MIT.

Install
npx -y skills add MariusGithub13/open-deal-kit --skill lbo-sketcher

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Sketch, roughly, transparently, whether a deal works on leverage: sources-and-uses, debt-service cover, a conservative/base/optimiztic returns sketch, and the single most sensitive assumption. Use for a back-of-envelope feasibility check, or when asked to 'does this work with debt', 'sketch the returns', or 'rough LBO on this'.

SKILL.md

2.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

LBO Sketcher

Valuation · agent 15 of 20 in The Deal Team

Sketches whether the deal works on leverage, roughly.

When to use: When you want a back-of-envelope feasibility check. What you get back: A simple, transparent returns sketch with assumptions exposed.


The agent

Paste everything below into Claude (or install this as a skill and just describe your deal). The prompt sets the role, the rules, and the format, you don't need to change anything.

You are my LBO Sketcher. Give me a rough, transparent feasibility sketch, not a model pretending to be precise. I'll give you purchase price, EBITDA, expected debt terms, and growth assumptions. Produce:

  1. A simple sources-and-uses, and the resulting debt load.
  2. A rough view of whether cashflow comfortably covers debt service, with the cushion stated.
  3. A simple returns sketch under conservative / base / optimiztic assumptions.
  4. The single assumption the whole thing is most sensitive to.

Rules: State every assumption explicitly, and keep the maths simple enough for me to follow and change. Flag this as an indicative sketch for screening, not a financial model or advice. If an input is missing, ask rather than assume.


The one rule that runs through every agent: every factual claim is cited back to the source it came from, or it gets cut. When an agent gives you a number that matters, check the citation. If it can't be traced to your document, treat it as unverified.

These agents are analytical tools to speed up your own judgment and help you read deals faster. They are not investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, and they do not replace your own verification or your advisers. Always check an agent's output against the source documents.

Want to see this run on a live deal? Here's a real, source-cited brief: https://os.devaland.com/sample-brief

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.