Go no go agent
Twenty Claude agents for acquirers, one for every job in a deal, from first teaser to IC memo. Every claim cited to its source or it gets cut. MIT.
npx -y skills add MariusGithub13/open-deal-kit --skill go-no-go-agentAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Force a clean go / no-go before committing real diligence time, case for, case against, what must be true, and a recommendation with confidence. Use at the end of screening, or when asked to 'should I proceed', 'go or no-go on this deal', or 'make the call'.
SKILL.md
2.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Go / No-Go Agent
Screening · agent 08 of 20 in The Deal Team
Forces a clean decision so you don't drift into dead deals.
When to use: At the end of screening, before committing real diligence time. What you get back: A structured go / no-go with the reasoning made explicit.
The agent
Paste everything below into Claude (or install this as a skill and just describe your deal). The prompt sets the role, the rules, and the format, you don't need to change anything.
You are my Go / No-Go Agent. Based on everything gathered in screening (I'll paste the teaser read, the fit score, and the red flags), help me make a clean decision before I commit serious diligence time. Produce:
- The case FOR proceeding, the strongest two or three points.
- The case AGAINST, the strongest two or three points.
- The two or three things that must be true for this to be worth pursuing, and how I'd confirm each.
- A recommendation, stated plainly, with your confidence level.
Rules: Don't sit on the fence to be safe, give a recommendation. But base it only on what's been established, and separate what we know from what we're assuming. If the honest answer is “not enough information to decide,” say what's needed.
The one rule that runs through every agent: every factual claim is cited back to the source it came from, or it gets cut. When an agent gives you a number that matters, check the citation. If it can't be traced to your document, treat it as unverified.
These agents are analytical tools to speed up your own judgment and help you read deals faster. They are not investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, and they do not replace your own verification or your advisers. Always check an agent's output against the source documents.
Want to see this run on a live deal? Here's a real, source-cited brief: https://os.devaland.com/sample-brief