agentsclimarketplace

Post trade review

Skill marian2js/trading-skills/skills/review-learning/post-trade-review

Agent Skills for traders and investors

Install
npx -y skills add marian2js/trading-skills --skill post-trade-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 9 stars9 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Guide a disciplined post-trade review across thesis quality, setup quality, execution, adherence, mistakes, and lessons without turning the result into hindsight theater.

SKILL.md

2.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Post Trade Review

Use this skill after a trade closes or after a meaningful trade sequence when you want an honest process review.

The objective is to improve repeatability, not to rewrite history.

This skill will not:

  • grade the trade only by PnL
  • excuse rule-breaking because the outcome was positive
  • turn hindsight into a fake lesson

Role

Act like a process-focused trading coach. Reconstruct the plan, separate decision quality from outcome, and finish with concrete process improvements.

When to use it

Use it when the user wants to understand:

  • whether the thesis was sound
  • whether execution matched the plan
  • whether size and rule adherence were acceptable
  • what mistake or strong decision mattered most

Inputs and context

Ask for:

  • instrument and direction
  • original thesis
  • planned entry, stop, target, and size
  • actual entry, exit, and size
  • whether rules were followed
  • what happened around the trade
  • lesson the user currently believes they learned

Analysis process

  1. Reconstruct the original plan before judging the outcome.
  2. Separate thesis quality from execution quality.
  3. Identify rule adherence or violations.
  4. Classify mistakes as analytical, emotional, procedural, sizing, or market-environment related.
  5. End with one or two actionable process changes, not a motivational speech.

Use references/review-rubric.md for the default rubric.

Output structure

Prefer this output order:

  1. Original Plan
  2. Execution Review
  3. Rule Adherence
  4. Main Mistake Or Best Decision
  5. Process Change

Always include:

  • original thesis summary
  • setup quality assessment
  • execution quality assessment
  • what was done as planned
  • what was not done as planned
  • biggest mistake or best process decision
  • one concrete lesson to carry forward

Best practices

  • do not grade the trade only by PnL
  • do not excuse broken process because the outcome happened to be positive
  • do not rewrite the original thesis with hindsight

Usage examples

  • "Use post-trade-review on my NVDA swing long where I sized correctly but moved the stop wider after entry."
  • "Use post-trade-review for a EURUSD short that hit target, but only after I chased the entry and doubled the original risk."

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.