Bmad code review
BMad Method v6.10.0 packaged for Pi Coding Agent. Global & project-local install, portable defaults, project-scoped outputs, /bmad-init initializer. Retains bmad-investigate.
npx -y skills add mannnrachman/pi-bmad --skill bmad-code-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
3 things to look at
- 14 days oldThe repository was created 14 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"
SKILL.md
4.3 KB, 925 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Code Review Workflow
Goal: Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers and structured triage.
Your Role: You are an elite code reviewer. You gather context, launch parallel adversarial reviews, triage findings with precision, and present actionable results. No noise, no filler.
Subagents, when the capability is available, are an important part of this workflow. Use them as directed by the workflow steps. If you need an explicit user instruction to run them, ask once now for the whole workflow run.
Conventions
- Bare paths (e.g.
checklist.md) resolve from the skill root. {skill-root}resolves to this skill's installed directory (wherecustomize.tomllives).{project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.{skill-name}resolves to the skill directory's basename.
On Activation
Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
Run: python3 {skill-root}/../../runtime/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow
If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
{skill-root}/customize.toml— defaults{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml— team overrides{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml— personal overrides
Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.
Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.
Step 3: Load Persistent Facts
Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.
Step 4: Load Config
Load config from the merged output of python3 {skill-root}/../../runtime/scripts/resolve_config.py --project-root {project-root} --key core --key modules.bmm and resolve:
project_name,planning_artifacts,implementation_artifacts,user_namecommunication_language,document_output_language,user_skill_leveldateas system-generated current datetimesprint_status={implementation_artifacts}/sprint-status.yamlproject_context=**/project-context.md(load if exists)- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config
{communication_language}
Step 5: Greet the User
Greet {user_name}, speaking in {communication_language}.
Step 6: Execute Append Steps
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_append} in order.
Activation is complete. If activation_steps_prepend or activation_steps_append were non-empty, confirm every entry was executed in order before proceeding. Do not begin the main workflow until all activation steps have been completed.
WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
This uses step-file architecture for disciplined execution:
- Micro-file Design: Each step is self-contained and followed exactly
- Just-In-Time Loading: Only load the current step file
- Sequential Enforcement: Complete steps in order, no skipping
- State Tracking: Persist progress via in-memory variables
- Append-Only Building: Build artifacts incrementally
Step Processing Rules
- READ COMPLETELY: Read the entire step file before acting
- FOLLOW SEQUENCE: Execute sections in order
- WAIT FOR INPUT: Halt at checkpoints and wait for human
- LOAD NEXT: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
- NEVER load multiple step files simultaneously
- ALWAYS read entire step file before execution
- NEVER skip steps or optimize the sequence
- ALWAYS follow the exact instructions in the step file
- ALWAYS halt at checkpoints and wait for human input
FIRST STEP
Read fully and follow: ./steps/step-01-gather-context.md
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most code review skills give in 925 tokens
Counted across 610 of the 674 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- push back with technical reasoning if wrongin 60 of 610, across 24 files
- ask for clarification on unclear itemsin 51 of 610, across 16 files
- fix critical issues immediatelyin 45 of 610, across 29 files
- implement one item at a timein 45 of 610, across 11 files
- group findings by severityin 44 of 610, across 43 files
- verify feedback against the codebasein 42 of 610, across 8 files
- dispatch a code reviewer subagentin 39 of 610, across 23 files
- fix important issues before proceedingin 37 of 610, across 22 files
- test each fix individuallyin 35 of 610, across 7 files
- reply in github comment threadsin 33 of 610, across 5 files
- check for security vulnerabilitiesin 31 of 610, across 27 files
- factualize corrections without over-explainingin 30 of 610, across 2 files
Said here and by no other author read
- run the workflow resolver script first
- merge missing customization files manually if the resolver fails
- execute activation prepend steps in order
- load all persistent facts as foundational context
- load the specified project configuration values
- speak in the configured communication language
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.