Competitive analysis
Skill lzx-Bill/Project-Factory-Core/.agents/skills/competitive-analysis
Docs-first project incubation with 34 composable AI Agent skills—from idea and requirements to architecture, acceptance, and implementation handoff.
npx -y skills add lzx-Bill/Project-Factory-Core --skill competitive-analysisAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 21 days oldThe repository was created 21 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when conducting structured competitor or alternative solution research with standardized comparison frameworks. Trigger when user says "competitor analysis", "compare X to Y", "alternative solutions", "market comparison", "vs competitor", "替代方案对比", "竞品分析", or when user needs a formal comparison matrix with defined criteria. This is a specialized variant of research-spikes — use research-spikes for general exploration, use this skill when a structured comparison is the primary output.
SKILL.md
3.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Competitive Analysis
用于结构化竞品和替代方案对比研究。
When to Use
- 需要系统化对比多个竞品或替代方案
- 需要建立标准对比维度和评分体系
- 选型决策前需要结构化证据
- 用户明确要求"竞品分析报告"
Input
| 来源 | 内容 |
|---|---|
| 用户消息 | 竞品列表、对比维度、选型优先级 |
| 当前项目 | 项目需求、约束条件、成功标准（用于定义对比维度） |
Output Schema
| 文件 | 类型 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|
wiki/02-research/market-notes.md | 市场笔记 | 竞品对比矩阵、评分表 |
Minimum Viable Output
- 含 ≥3 个竞品或替代方案
- 含 ≥4 个对比维度
- 含每个方案在各维度的定性评估
Complete Output
- 完整的对比矩阵（定量 + 定性）
- 每个维度含权重和评分理由
- 含推荐方案和适用场景
- 含风险和限制
- 含参考资料来源
Dependencies
| 类型 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| 前置 | overview-framing（了解项目定位，用于定义对比维度） |
| 后置 | architecture-decisions（竞品分析结论输入架构选型） |
| 并行 | research-spikes（共享调研方法） |
| 依赖读取 | vision.md（项目定位）、requirements.md（成功标准） |
Procedure
- 确认对比范围和竞品列表
- 定义对比维度（基于项目成功标准和约束）
- 收集每个方案在各维度的信息
- 填写对比矩阵
- 加权评分（如适用）
- 给出推荐和适用场景
- 标注信息来源和置信度
- 增量写入：如果
market-notes.md已存在（由 research-spikes 等创建），读取现有内容，在末尾追加## 结构化对比section，不覆盖已有笔记
与 research-spikes 的区别
| Skill | 关注点 | 输出形式 |
|---|---|---|
research-spikes | 调研和验证，可以是任意方向 | Spike 记录、研究笔记 |
competitive-analysis | 结构化对比，标准化矩阵 | 对比矩阵、评分表 |
当用户明确要求"对比 A 和 B"或"竞品分析"时，使用本 skill。当用户要求"验证 X 技术可行性"时，使用 research-spikes。
Target Pages
<项目根目录>/wiki/02-research/market-notes.md（主，与 research-spikes 共享）
与 research-spikes 共享 market-notes.md 的协调规则
| 规则 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| 增量写入 | 所有 skill 都增量追加到 market-notes.md，不覆盖已有内容 |
| 章节标识 | competitive-analysis 写入以 ## 结构化对比 为标题的 section |
| research-spikes | 以 ## 竞品笔记 或 ## 调研发现 为标题的 section |
| 冲突处理 | 如发现内容矛盾，标注 ⚠️ 待确认：与 xxx 的结论存在冲突，不直接覆盖 |
Changelog
| 日期 | 变更 | 原因 |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-26 | 新建 skill | 填补 skill 集合中的结构化竞品分析空白，与 research-spikes 形成互补 |