Git workflow
One git checkout drops a shared AI coding setup (skills, subagents, MCP servers, OpenSpec scaffolding) into any project, across Claude Code, Kilo, OpenCode, Codex, and Copilot.
npx -y skills add Lukk17/agent-standards --skill git-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Git workflow patterns including branching strategies, commit conventions, merge vs rebase, conflict resolution, and collaborative development best practices for teams of all sizes.
SKILL.md
18.5 KB, ~4.7k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Git Workflow Patterns
Best practices for Git version control, branching strategies, and collaborative development.
When to Activate
- Setting up Git workflow for a new project
- Deciding on branching strategy (GitFlow, trunk-based, GitHub flow)
- Writing commit messages and PR descriptions
- Resolving merge conflicts
- Managing releases and version tags
- Onboarding new team members to Git practices
Branching Strategies
GitHub Flow (Simple, Recommended for Most)
Best for continuous deployment and small-to-medium teams.
main (protected, always deployable)
│
├── feature/user-auth → PR → merge to main
├── feature/payment-flow → PR → merge to main
└── fix/login-bug → PR → merge to main
Rules:
mainis always deployable- Create feature branches from
main - Open Pull Request when ready for review
- After approval and CI passes, merge to
main - Deploy immediately after merge
Trunk-Based Development (High-Velocity Teams)
Best for teams with strong CI/CD and feature flags.
main (trunk)
│
├── short-lived feature (1-2 days max)
├── short-lived feature
└── short-lived feature
Rules:
- Everyone commits to
mainor very short-lived branches - Feature flags hide incomplete work
- CI must pass before merge
- Deploy multiple times per day
GitFlow (Complex, Release-Cycle Driven)
Best for scheduled releases and enterprise projects.
main (production releases)
│
└── develop (integration branch)
│
├── feature/user-auth
├── feature/payment
│
├── release/1.0.0 → merge to main and develop
│
└── hotfix/critical → merge to main and develop
Rules:
maincontains production-ready code onlydevelopis the integration branch- Feature branches from
develop, merge back todevelop - Release branches from
develop, merge tomainanddevelop - Hotfix branches from
main, merge to bothmainanddevelop
When to Use Which
| Strategy | Team Size | Release Cadence | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Flow | Any | Continuous | SaaS, web apps, startups |
| Trunk-Based | 5+ experienced | Multiple/day | High-velocity teams, feature flags |
| GitFlow | 10+ | Scheduled | Enterprise, regulated industries |
Commit Messages
Conventional Commits Format
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
Types
| Type | Use For | Example |
|---|---|---|
feat | New feature | feat(auth): add OAuth2 login |
fix | Bug fix | fix(api): handle null response in user endpoint |
docs | Documentation | docs(readme): update installation instructions |
style | Formatting, no code change | style: fix indentation in login component |
refactor | Code refactoring | refactor(db): extract connection pool to module |
test | Adding/updating tests | test(auth): add unit tests for token validation |
chore | Maintenance tasks | chore(deps): update dependencies |
perf | Performance improvement | perf(query): add index to users table |
ci | CI/CD changes | ci: add PostgreSQL service to test workflow |
revert | Revert previous commit | revert: revert "feat(auth): add OAuth2 login" |
Good vs Bad Examples
# BAD: Vague, no context
git commit -m "fixed stuff"
git commit -m "updates"
git commit -m "WIP"
# GOOD: Clear, specific, explains why
git commit -m "fix(api): retry requests on 503 Service Unavailable
The external API occasionally returns 503 errors during peak hours.
Added exponential backoff retry logic with max 3 attempts.
Closes #123"
Commit Message Template
Create .gitmessage in repo root:
# <type>(<scope>): <subject>
# # Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, test, chore, perf, ci, revert
# Scope: api, ui, db, auth, etc.
# Subject: imperative mood, no period, max 50 chars
#
# [optional body] - explain why, not what
# [optional footer] - Breaking changes, closes #issue
Enable with: git config commit.template .gitmessage
Merge vs Rebase
Merge (Preserves History)
# Creates a merge commit
git checkout main
git merge feature/user-auth
# Result:
# * merge commit
# |\
# | * feature commits
# |/
# * main commits
Use when:
- Merging feature branches into
main - You want to preserve exact history
- Multiple people worked on the branch
- The branch has been pushed and others may have based work on it
Rebase (Linear History)
# Rewrites feature commits onto target branch
git checkout feature/user-auth
git rebase main
# Result:
# * feature commits (rewritten)
# * main commits
Use when:
- Updating your local feature branch with latest
main - You want a linear, clean history
- The branch is local-only (not pushed)
- You're the only one working on the branch
Rebase Workflow
# Update feature branch with latest main (before PR)
git checkout feature/user-auth
git fetch origin
git rebase origin/main
# Fix any conflicts
# Tests should still pass
# Force push (only if you're the only contributor)
git push --force-with-lease origin feature/user-auth
Any push, including --force-with-lease, happens only on explicit user instruction. Prefer --force-with-lease over
--force so you never clobber commits you have not seen; on shared or public branches, revert instead of rewriting (see
When NOT to Rebase).
When NOT to Rebase
# NEVER rebase branches that:
- Have been pushed to a shared repository
- Other people have based work on
- Are protected branches (main, develop)
- Are already merged
# Why: Rebase rewrites history, breaking others' work
Pull Request Workflow
PR Title Format
<type>(<scope>): <description>
Examples:
feat(auth): add SSO support for enterprise users
fix(api): resolve race condition in order processing
docs(api): add OpenAPI specification for v2 endpoints
PR Description Template
## What
Brief description of what this PR does.
## Why
Explain the motivation and context.
## How
Key implementation details worth highlighting.
## Testing
- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing performed
## Screenshots (if applicable)
Before/after screenshots for UI changes.
## Checklist
- [ ] Code follows project style guidelines
- [ ] Self-review completed
- [ ] Comments added for complex logic
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No new warnings introduced
- [ ] Tests pass locally
- [ ] Related issues linked
Closes #123
Code Review Checklist
For Reviewers:
- Does the code solve the stated problem?
- Are there any edge cases not handled?
- Is the code readable and maintainable?
- Are there sufficient tests?
- Are there security concerns?
- Is the commit history clean (squashed if needed)?
For Authors:
- Self-review completed before requesting review
- CI passes (tests, lint, typecheck)
- PR size is reasonable (<500 lines ideal)
- Related to a single feature/fix
- Description clearly explains the change
Conflict Resolution
Identify Conflicts
# Check for conflicts before merge
git checkout main
git merge feature/user-auth --no-commit --no-ff
# If conflicts, Git will show:
# CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/auth/login.ts
# Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
Resolve Conflicts
# See conflicted files
git status
# View conflict markers in file
# <<<<<<< HEAD
# content from main
# =======
# content from feature branch
# >>>>>>> feature/user-auth
# Option 1: Manual resolution
# Edit file, remove markers, keep correct content
# Option 2: Use merge tool
git mergetool
# Option 3: Accept one side
git checkout --ours src/auth/login.ts # Keep main version
git checkout --theirs src/auth/login.ts # Keep feature version
# After resolving, stage and commit
git add src/auth/login.ts
git commit
Conflict Prevention Strategies
# 1. Keep feature branches small and short-lived
# 2. Rebase frequently onto main
git checkout feature/user-auth
git fetch origin
git rebase origin/main
# 3. Communicate with team about touching shared files
# 4. Use feature flags instead of long-lived branches
# 5. Review and merge PRs promptly
Branch Management
Naming Conventions
# Feature branches
feature/user-authentication
feature/JIRA-123-payment-integration
# Bug fixes
fix/login-redirect-loop
fix/456-null-pointer-exception
# Hotfixes (production issues)
hotfix/critical-security-patch
hotfix/database-connection-leak
# Releases
release/1.2.0
release/2024-01-hotfix
# Experiments/POCs
experiment/new-caching-strategy
poc/graphql-migration
Branch Cleanup
# Delete local branches that are merged
git branch --merged main | grep -v "^\*\|main" | xargs -n 1 git branch -d
# Delete remote-tracking references for deleted remote branches
git fetch -p
# Delete local branch
git branch -d feature/user-auth # Safe delete (only if merged)
git branch -D feature/user-auth # Force delete
# Delete remote branch
git push origin --delete feature/user-auth
Stash Workflow
# Save work in progress
git stash push -m "WIP: user authentication"
# List stashes
git stash list
# Apply most recent stash
git stash pop
# Apply specific stash
git stash apply stash@{2}
# Drop stash
git stash drop stash@{0}
Release Management
Semantic Versioning
MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
MAJOR: Breaking changes
MINOR: New features, backward compatible
PATCH: Bug fixes, backward compatible
Examples:
1.0.0 → 1.0.1 (patch: bug fix)
1.0.1 → 1.1.0 (minor: new feature)
1.1.0 → 2.0.0 (major: breaking change)
Creating Releases
# Create annotated tag
git tag -a v1.2.0 -m "Release v1.2.0
Features:
- Add user authentication
- Implement password reset
Fixes:
- Resolve login redirect issue
Breaking Changes:
- None"
# Push tag to remote
git push origin v1.2.0
# List tags
git tag -l
# Delete tag
git tag -d v1.2.0
git push origin --delete v1.2.0
Changelog Generation
# Generate changelog from commits
git log v1.1.0..v1.2.0 --oneline --no-merges
# Or use conventional-changelog
npx conventional-changelog -i CHANGELOG.md -s
Git Configuration
Essential Configs
# User identity
git config --global user.name "Your Name"
git config --global user.email "[email protected]"
# Default branch name
git config --global init.defaultBranch main
# Pull behavior (rebase instead of merge)
git config --global pull.rebase true
# Push behavior (push current branch only)
git config --global push.default current
# Auto-correct typos
git config --global help.autocorrect 1
# Better diff algorithm
git config --global diff.algorithm histogram
# Color output
git config --global color.ui auto
Useful Aliases
# Add to ~/.gitconfig
[alias]
co = checkout
br = branch
ci = commit
st = status
unstage = reset HEAD --
last = log -1 HEAD
visual = log --oneline --graph --all
amend = commit --amend --no-edit
wip = commit -m "WIP"
undo = reset --soft HEAD~1
contributors = shortlog -sn
Gitignore Patterns
# Dependencies
node_modules/
vendor/
# Build outputs
dist/
build/
*.o
*.exe
# Environment files
.env
.env.local
.env.*.local
# IDE
.idea/
.vscode/
*.swp
*.swo
# OS files
.DS_Store
Thumbs.db
# Logs
*.log
logs/
# Test coverage
coverage/
# Cache
.cache/
*.tsbuildinfo
Common Workflows
Starting a New Feature
# 1. Update main branch
git checkout main
git pull origin main
# 2. Create feature branch
git checkout -b feature/user-auth
# 3. Make changes and commit (stage explicit paths, not the whole tree)
git add src/auth/oauth.ts src/auth/oauth.test.ts
git commit -m "feat(auth): implement OAuth2 login"
Commits stay local until you decide to share them. When you are ready, and only on explicit instruction, push the branch and open the PR as separate deliberate steps:
git push -u origin feature/user-auth
Then create the Pull Request on GitHub/GitLab.
Updating a PR with New Changes
git add src/auth/oauth.ts
git commit -m "feat(auth): add error handling"
Pushing the update to the PR is a separate step, done only on explicit user instruction:
git push origin feature/user-auth
Syncing Fork with Upstream
# 1. Add upstream remote (once)
git remote add upstream https://github.com/original/repo.git
# 2. Fetch upstream
git fetch upstream
# 3. Merge upstream/main into your main
git checkout main
git merge upstream/main
Push the synced main to your fork only when you choose to, on explicit instruction:
git push origin main
Undoing Mistakes
# Undo last commit (keep changes)
git reset --soft HEAD~1
# Undo last commit (discard changes)
git reset --hard HEAD~1
# Undo last commit pushed to remote
git revert HEAD
git push origin main
# Undo specific file changes
git checkout HEAD -- path/to/file
# Fix last commit message
git commit --amend -m "New message"
# Add forgotten file to last commit
git add forgotten-file
git commit --amend --no-edit
Git Hooks
Pre-Commit Hook
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-commit
# Run linting
npm run lint || exit 1
# Run tests
npm test || exit 1
# Check for secrets
if git diff --cached | grep -E '(password|api_key|secret)'; then
echo "Possible secret detected. Commit aborted."
exit 1
fi
Pre-Push Hook
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-push
# Run full test suite
npm run test:all || exit 1
# Check for console.log statements
if git diff origin/main | grep -E 'console\.log'; then
echo "Remove console.log statements before pushing."
exit 1
fi
Anti-Patterns
# BAD: Committing directly to main
git checkout main
git commit -m "fix bug"
# GOOD: Use feature branches and PRs
# BAD: Committing secrets
git add .env # Contains API keys
# GOOD: Add to .gitignore, use environment variables
# BAD: Giant PRs (1000+ lines)
# GOOD: Break into smaller, focused PRs
# BAD: "Update" commit messages
git commit -m "update"
git commit -m "fix"
# GOOD: Descriptive messages
git commit -m "fix(auth): resolve redirect loop after login"
# BAD: Rewriting public history
git push --force origin main
# GOOD: Use revert for public branches (and any push happens only on explicit user instruction)
git revert HEAD
# BAD: Long-lived feature branches (weeks/months)
# GOOD: Keep branches short (days), rebase frequently
# BAD: Committing generated files
git add dist/
git add node_modules/
# GOOD: Add to .gitignore
Quick Reference
| Task | Command |
|---|---|
| Create branch | git checkout -b feature/name |
| Switch branch | git checkout branch-name |
| Delete branch | git branch -d branch-name |
| Merge branch | git merge branch-name |
| Rebase branch | git rebase main |
| View history | git log --oneline --graph |
| View changes | git diff |
| Stage changes | git add -p or explicit paths (git add . only after verifying every file) |
| Commit | git commit -m "message" |
| Push | git push origin branch-name |
| Pull | git pull origin branch-name |
| Stash | git stash push -m "message" |
| Undo last commit | git reset --soft HEAD~1 |
| Revert commit | git revert HEAD |
Commit Signing
All commits and tags must be cryptographically signed. SSH keys are preferred over GPG:
git config --global commit.gpgsign true
git config --global gpg.format ssh
git config --global user.signingkey ~/.ssh/id_ed25519.pub
# Verify: git log --show-signature
Secret Scanning Pre-commit Hook
Install git-secrets and configure it as a pre-commit hook to prevent credentials from being committed:
git secrets --install
git secrets --register-aws # or custom patterns
Pull Request Template
Every repository must have .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:
## What
<!-- Describe what changed and why -->
## Why
<!-- Link to issue/ticket; explain the motivation -->
## How
<!-- Summarize the technical approach -->
## Testing Done
<!-- What tests were run? What scenarios were verified? -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tests pass (`CI green`)
- [ ] No new lint warnings
- [ ] Documentation updated if needed
- [ ] Migration scripts reviewed (if DB changes)
Code Review Standards
SLA: Reviewers must respond within 1 business day of review request.
Comment prefixes (enforce consistent semantics):
blocking:: must be resolved before mergenit:: optional style preference; author may ignorequestion:: seeking understanding; no action required unless author chooses
Branch protection (required settings):
- Minimum 2 approving reviews before merge
- Dismiss stale reviews when new commits are pushed
- Require branch to be up-to-date with base before merge
Merge Strategy by Scenario
| Scenario | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Feature branch → main | Squash merge, clean history, one commit per feature |
| Hotfix → main | Merge commit (no-FF), preserves hotfix context |
| Release branch → main | Merge commit (no-FF), preserves release history |
| Rebase | Only on local, un-pushed commits, never rewrite shared history |
Automated Changelog
Use git-cliff or conventional-changelog on every release:
git-cliff --tag v1.2.0 -o CHANGELOG.md
Requires Conventional Commits format: feat:, fix:, chore:, docs:, etc.
Git LFS
Track binary assets in Git LFS:
git lfs track "*.png" "*.jpg" "*.gif" "*.mp4" "*.pdf" "*.zip" "*.jar" "*.wasm" "*.fbx" "*.wav" "*.mp3"
git add .gitattributes
Branch Lifecycle Policy
- Auto-delete merged branches immediately after merge (enable in GitHub/GitLab settings)
- Stale branch review: any unmerged branch older than 30 days must be reviewed: either rebased and merged, or deleted
- Never leave
WIP/draftbranches open indefinitely
Monorepo Configuration
For monorepos:
- Use CODEOWNERS with path-based ownership:
.github/CODEOWNERS - Configure path-based CI triggers so only affected packages re-run
- Consider Turborepo, Pants, or Bazel for incremental build graphs
# .github/CODEOWNERS
/packages/auth/ @team-security
/apps/frontend/ @team-frontend
/infra/ @team-platform
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.