Review fix loop

Skill lubochka/xiigen-general-skills/claude/skills/review-fix-loop

Open-source AI agent skills for safer Claude, Codex and Cursor coding workflows

Install

npx -y skills add lubochka/xiigen-general-skills --skill review-fix-loop

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Close actionable feedback through repeated review and repair. Use after plan review, code review, content review, or release-gate review.

SKILL.md

0.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Review Fix Loop

Purpose

Close actionable feedback through repeated review and repair.

When to Use

Use after plan review, code review, content review, or release-gate review.

Inputs

Review comments, priority, affected files, acceptance criteria.

Steps

Classify findings as actionable, question, or non-goal.
Fix actionable findings.
Re-run targeted checks.
Re-review failed areas until pass or blocker.

Gates

All actionable findings are fixed, deferred with reason, or blocked.

Evidence

Updated files, recheck results, and review status table.

Anti-Patterns

Fixing one item and closing the whole review.

generated-code-review, goal-delivery-completeness

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most code review skills give

Counted across 610 of the 674 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06

push back with technical reasoning if wrongin 60 of 610, across 24 files
ask for clarification on unclear itemsin 51 of 610, across 16 files
fix critical issues immediatelyin 45 of 610, across 29 files
implement one item at a timein 45 of 610, across 11 files
group findings by severityin 44 of 610, across 43 files
verify feedback against the codebasein 42 of 610, across 8 files
dispatch a code reviewer subagentin 39 of 610, across 23 files
fix important issues before proceedingin 37 of 610, across 22 files
test each fix individuallyin 35 of 610, across 7 files
reply in github comment threadsin 33 of 610, across 5 files
check for security vulnerabilitiesin 31 of 610, across 27 files
factualize corrections without over-explainingin 30 of 610, across 2 files

Said here and by no other author read

Classify findings as actionable, question, or non-goal
Fix actionable findings
Re-run targeted checks
Re-review failed areas until pass or blocker
Defer unblocked items with a reason

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.