Test plan writer
Write a validation plan for a change, including automated tests, manual checks, regression coverage, and exploratory testing. Use it when you need to scope verification quickly before a PR.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add lteawoo/skills --skill test-plan-writerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.3 KB, 420 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Test Plan Writer
Purpose
Create an actionable test plan tailored to the change.
Core Principles
- Scope validation by user impact, not just implementation details.
- Separate automated checks from manual validation.
- Cover both success and failure flows.
- Prioritize paths with the highest regression risk.
- Include visual validation whenever the UI changes.
- Decide in advance what evidence will prove validation, such as command output, logs, or screenshots.
Inputs
- Change summary
- Affected files or modules
- User impact or risk
- Available test tools or environment details, if available
Workflow
- Identify the user flows and system paths affected by the change.
- Pull out the highest-risk scenarios first.
- Separate what can be covered by automated tests from what needs manual validation.
- Add failure, exception, permission, and boundary-value cases.
- Include regression checks for existing behavior.
- Document what evidence should be captured from validation.
Output Format
Test Goal
- Behavior this validation is meant to protect
Impact Scope
- User flows
- System or module impact
Priority
- High: scenarios that must be checked
- Medium: scenarios that should be checked if possible
- Low: scenarios to check if time allows
Automated Validation
- Commands to run
- Test types to cover
- Expected result
Manual Validation
- Core scenarios
- Failure or exception scenarios
- Permission or boundary-value scenarios
Regression Checks
- Existing areas that need rechecking
- Related feature checkpoints
Visual Validation
- Screen states to inspect
- Screenshots or other evidence to capture
Preconditions
- Required data
- Required accounts or permissions
- Environment variables or setup steps
Exit Criteria
- What must pass to consider validation complete
- Residual risks that remain
When Information Is Missing
- Draft the most complete test plan possible with the available context.
- Split missing environment details into explicit assumptions.
- Limit follow-up questions to three.
What ships with it: 1 file
2.2 KB alongside SKILL.md
- README.ko.md2.2 KB