Anti wechat ai check
Analyze articles for AI-generated content indicators and rewrite to pass WeChat's 3.27 non-human automated content creation detection. Checks for template phrases, transition word density, sentence uniformity, paragraph pattern repetition, and other signals that WeChat uses to flag AI content. Outputs a risk report and an optional humanized rewrite. Use when the user wants to check if an article looks AI-generated, make an article more human-like, bypass WeChat AI detection, or humanize AI-written content. Also trigger when the user mentions "去AI痕迹", "人性化润色", "微信AI检测", "anti-ai-check", "humanize article", "公众号发文检查".From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add lovstudio/skills --skill anti-wechat-ai-checkAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
5.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
anti-wechat-ai-check — 微信公众号 AI 痕迹检测与人性化润色
检测文章中的 AI 生成痕迹(模板短语、过渡词堆砌、句式雷同等),给出风险 评分和修改建议,并可输出人性化润色后的版本。基于微信公众平台运营规范 3.27 条款(非真人自动化创作行为)的检测逻辑。
When to Use
- 用户准备将 AI 辅助写作的文章发布到微信公众号
- 用户想检查一篇文章是否有明显 AI 痕迹
- 用户想将 AI 生成的草稿改写为更自然的人类风格
Workflow (MANDATORY)
You MUST follow these steps in order:
Step 1: Get the article
Determine the input source:
- If user provides a file path → read the file
- If user pastes text in the conversation → save to a temp file or use
--text
Step 2: Run analysis
python skills/lov-anti-wechat-ai-check/scripts/analyze.py \
--input <path> --format json
Or with inline text:
python skills/lov-anti-wechat-ai-check/scripts/analyze.py \
--text "文章内容" --format json
Step 3: Present findings
Show the user:
- Risk score (0-100) and risk level (LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH)
- Template phrases found — list each one with its location
- Structure issues — transition word density, paragraph uniformity, etc.
- Sentence issues — length uniformity, repeated starters, excessive "的"
Step 4: Ask the user
IMPORTANT: Use AskUserQuestion to ask what to do next:
| Option | Description |
|---|---|
| 仅查看报告 | 用户自己修改,skill 结束 |
| 给出修改建议 | 列出每个问题的具体修改建议,不改原文 |
| 直接输出修改版 | 输出人性化润色后的完整文章 |
Step 5: Humanize (if requested)
When rewriting, follow these humanization rules:
5a. 消除模板短语
- 删除或替换报告中标出的每个模板短语
- "随着科技的不断发展" → 直接说具体的事("去年 ChatGPT 发布后...")
- "综上所述" → 删掉,或换成口语化的收尾
5b. 降低过渡词密度
- 目标:过渡词密度 < 15%
- 删除不必要的 "首先/其次/此外/另外"
- 用具体的逻辑关系替代泛化连接词
5c. 打破句式均匀
- 刻意制造长短句交替:短句 < 15 字,长句 > 40 字
- 加入口语化表达、反问句、感叹句
- 偶尔使用不完整句或省略句
5d. 打破段落均匀
- 有的段落只有一两句话,有的段落可以很长
- 避免每段都是 "论点 + 论据 + 小结" 的三段式
5e. 增加人味
- 加入个人经历、具体案例、数字细节
- 使用口语化表达("说白了"、"讲真"、"你想想")
- 适当使用不规范但自然的表达
- 减少 "的" 字使用(目标 < 5%)
5f. 保留原意
- 核心观点和信息不能丢失
- 专业术语保留,不要过度口语化
- 保持原文的立场和态度
Step 6: Output
Output the humanized article as markdown. If the input was a file, also offer
to write the result back to a file (with -humanized suffix).
CLI Reference
| Argument | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
--input, -i | — | Input file path (.md, .txt) |
--text, -t | — | Inline text to analyze |
--format, -f | text | Output format: text or json |
Dependencies
No external dependencies — stdlib only.
Runtime context (shared)
运行前读取本 Skill 包的 skill.yaml,由宿主提供 skill-runtime/v1 上下文。字段解析顺序为:当前请求、项目上下文、个人 Preferences、品牌 Profile、通用默认值。
- 只使用 Manifest 声明的字段;Profile 保存公开品牌事实,Preferences 保存个人工作偏好。
required: true字段缺失时,按 Manifest 的问题配置向用户提出一个聚焦问题;用户明确同意后再保存回答。- 报错提供可复制的
context_id、字段路径与来源,诊断内容避开秘密、完整私人路径和原始配置。
通用反馈闭环
用户在 Skill 驱动任务中提出修改意见时,继续当前产物前必须执行:
- 先判断意见是
task-specific(仅本次)还是reusable(可跨任务复用)。 task-specific只修改当前任务,不改 Skill。reusable先确定作用域:领域规则先更新对应 canonical Skill;适用于所有 Skill 的规则先更新共享规范。- 完成规则更新、版本、lint 与分发核验后,再把修改应用到当前任务。
reusable修改会使此前的“确认”“继续”“发吧”失效;完成当前产物修改和回读后必须停下,等待用户下一步指示,不自动进入发布、提交或其他外部写入。
What ships with it: 3 files
13.9 KB alongside SKILL.md, 1 of them executable
scripts/
- analyze.pyruns11.1 KB
- CHANGELOG.md286 B
- README.md2.5 KB
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most quality gates skills give
Counted across 1,524 of the 2,830 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Read full output and check exit codein 45 of 1524, across 40 files
- Verify output confirms the claimin 44 of 1524, across 39 files
- Identify the command that proves the claimin 43 of 1524, across 39 files
- Execute the full verification commandin 36 of 1524, across 30 files
- Produce a verification reportin 34 of 1524, across 18 files
- Review git diff changesin 30 of 1524, across 16 files
- Fix build failures immediatelyin 29 of 1524, across 9 files
- Group findings by severityin 28 of 1524
- State claim only with evidencein 27 of 1524, across 22 files
- Verify regression tests with red-green cyclein 26 of 1524, across 22 files
- Run the full test suitein 26 of 1524, across 25 files
- Run test suite with coveragein 25 of 1524, across 10 files
Said here and by no other author read
- Run the analysis script with json format
- Present risk score and identified issues
- Remove or replace identified template phrases
- Reduce transition word density below fifteen percent
- Vary sentence length and structure
- Add personal experiences and specific examples
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.