Building sales team
Skill liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus/skills/building-sales-team
Build an early sales team: hiring plan, role scorecards, interview loop, onboarding/ramp.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus --skill building-sales-teamAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
SKILL.md
10.1 KB, ~2.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Building Sales Team
Scope
Covers
- Deciding when to hire sales vs continue founder-led selling
- Designing the first sales team (pilot AE/SDR/hybrid) and hiring sequence
- Hiring for repeatability (avoid “one heroic rep” dependency)
- Setting a minimal operating cadence (ramp plan, metrics, coaching loop)
- Technical / product-heavy selling: “sales that can pass for PMs”
When to use
- “We’re ready to hire our first AE / SDR—help me design the plan.”
- “Should we hire sales now or wait until the motion is repeatable?”
- “Create role scorecards + an interview loop for early sales hires.”
- “We’re starting product-led sales—how do we run a small pilot team?”
- “Build an onboarding + 30/60/90 ramp plan for the first reps.”
When NOT to use
- You need to get first customers / validate ICP from scratch (use
founder-salesfirst) - You need to design OTE, quotas, commission mechanics, or pay mix for sales roles (use
sales-compensation) - You need general interview best practices or structured hiring for non-sales roles (use
conducting-interviews) - You need onboarding playbooks for non-sales new hires (use
onboarding-new-hires) - You’re scaling a mature sales org (territories, forecasting, multi-layer management)
- You need legal/HR advice, compensation plan legal review, or employment compliance guidance
- You want generic hiring advice without a defined sales motion and measurable readiness gates
Inputs
Minimum required
- Company stage (pre-seed/seed/Series A+) and current GTM motion (PLG, outbound, enterprise, inbound)
- Current funnel baseline: last ~50–100 “at-bats” if available (first meetings → closed-won), win rate, typical ACV, cycle length
- ICP + product complexity (how technical is the sell; who must be convinced)
- Current resources: founder time, CS/support involvement, marketing demand, budget/headcount constraints
- Timeline + success definition (e.g., “2 reps ramped to $X pipeline/month in 90 days”)
Missing-info strategy
- Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
- If data is missing, proceed with explicit assumptions and deliver two options: (A) “Hire now (pilot)” vs (B) “Wait + founder-led milestones to hit first”.
Outputs (deliverables)
Produce a Sales Team Build Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):
- Context snapshot (stage, motion, ICP, constraints, targets)
- Readiness gate (hire-now vs wait) with measurable criteria
- Team design + hiring sequence (who to hire first/second; when; why)
- Role scorecards (AE/SDR/hybrid) + evaluation criteria (incl. product depth bar)
- Interview loop + practical exercises + scoring sheet
- Onboarding + 30/60/90 ramp plan + coaching/metrics cadence
- Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)
Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md
Workflow (7 steps)
1) Intake + stage gating (should we hire now?)
- Inputs: User context; references/INTAKE.md; any funnel history.
- Actions: Identify the GTM motion and whether the founder has achieved a repeatable baseline. Look for: (a) organic demand/hand-raisers (if PLG), and/or (b) a repeatable win rate from first meeting → close (target range often ~15–25% over ~50–100 at-bats). Decide: Hire now vs Wait.
- Outputs: Context snapshot + readiness gate decision + assumptions/unknowns.
- Checks: The decision is tied to measurable evidence (or clearly labeled assumptions).
2) Define the “repeatable motion” you’re hiring into
- Inputs: ICP, use case, pricing/packaging, current discovery/demo flow.
- Actions: Write a 1-page “sales motion spec”: qualification, first meeting agenda, demo/pilot criteria, pricing guardrails, common objections, and what counts as an “at-bat”. Clarify founder vs rep responsibilities for the next 60–90 days.
- Outputs: Sales motion spec + handoff boundaries.
- Checks: A new rep could run the next 10 deals with this spec without inventing the process.
3) Choose the initial team topology (pilot-first) + sequence hires
- Inputs: Motion spec; readiness decision; budget; pipeline sources.
- Actions: Select the simplest starting shape:
- PLG/hand-raisers: attach yourself to a pilot AE and/or SDR and run it as a learning pod (not quota theater).
- Outbound: consider an SDR+AE sequence (or a hybrid rep) depending on deal complexity.
- In very early stages: use founder/CS/support to close a subset of deals until the motion is proven. Build a hiring sequence that enables A/B testing: if feasible, hire two reps close together to avoid “one data point” dependence.
- Outputs: Team design + hiring plan table (roles, timing, success criteria, risks).
- Checks: The plan creates comparability (two reps or comparable cohorts) and protects learning time.
4) Write role scorecards (hire for product depth + learning ability)
- Inputs: Motion spec; team design; customer/technical context.
- Actions: Draft scorecards for each role (AE/SDR/hybrid). For technical products, set a “PM-like” bar: reps should demonstrate product intuition, curiosity, and the ability to earn engineer trust. Translate insights into “must-have signals” + “red flags”.
- Outputs: Role scorecards + evaluation rubric.
- Checks: Scorecards are specific enough that two interviewers would rate candidates similarly.
5) Build an interview loop with practical tests
- Inputs: Scorecards; references/TEMPLATES.md (interview kit).
- Actions: Define stages, interviewers, and exercises (e.g., mock discovery, objection handling, written follow-up email, product deep-dive, “explain to 10 engineers” test). Add structured scoring and a debrief protocol to reduce gut-feel hiring.
- Outputs: Interview plan + question bank + score sheet.
- Checks: Every interview maps to a scorecard signal; pass/fail criteria are explicit.
6) Create onboarding + ramp plan (and a simple management system)
- Inputs: Motion spec; expected pipeline sources; enablement assets (or create minimal ones).
- Actions: Build a 30/60/90 plan: training, shadowing, call reviews, pipeline targets, activity guardrails, and demo/pilot readiness. Define weekly cadence (pipeline review, call coaching, experiment review). Preserve the “A/B test humans” approach by tracking rep-to-rep differences and diagnosing process vs person.
- Outputs: Onboarding plan + ramp targets + coaching cadence + metrics list.
- Checks: Ramp targets are measurable; coaching loop is scheduled; “definition of done” exists for each phase.
7) Quality gate + finalize
- Inputs: Draft pack.
- Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps and identify what would change the hire/wait decision.
- Outputs: Final Sales Team Build Pack.
- Checks: A stakeholder can approve the plan and start hiring this week (or confidently defer with clear milestones).
Quality gate (required)
- Use references/CHECKLISTS.md and references/RUBRIC.md.
- Always include: Risks, Open questions, Next steps.
Anti-patterns
Avoid these common failure modes when building an early sales team:
- Hiring a VP Sales before the motion is repeatable. Founders delegate sales before proving a repeatable, measurable process. A VP Sales cannot “figure it out” for you at seed stage; the founder must own the first 20-50 deals. Redirect to
founder-salesuntil win rate and cycle length are known. - One heroic rep dependency. Hiring a single AE and declaring success when they close deals. You cannot distinguish a great rep from a great market with n=1. Always plan for comparability (hire two reps close together or run structured A/B).
- Premature specialization. Splitting SDR/AE/CS roles before the team has enough volume to justify handoffs. Early teams often need hybrid reps who can prospect, demo, and close. Over-specializing creates empty pipelines and finger-pointing.
- Quota theater on day one. Setting aggressive quotas during ramp and measuring new reps on bookings before they have pipeline, product knowledge, or territory coverage. Ramp plans must define leading indicators (calls, demos, pipeline created) before lagging ones (revenue).
- Copy-pasting enterprise scorecards for seed-stage hires. Using big-company role descriptions (15+ years experience, Rolodex required) when you need scrappy, coachable reps who can learn your product deeply. Scorecards must match your stage and selling motion.
Examples
Example 1 (first AE hires):
“Use building-sales-team. We’re seed-stage B2B SaaS. Founder has closed 12 customers; last 60 first meetings → 14 closed-won (~23%). ACV $12k. We want to hire our first AEs. Output: a Sales Team Build Pack with readiness gate, hire-two plan, role scorecards, and interview loop.”
Example 2 (PLG → PLS pilot):
“Use building-sales-team. We have steady inbound hand-raisers from our product. We want a pilot AE/SDR pod to close mid-market upgrades. Output: team topology, hiring sequence, and a 30/60/90 ramp with coaching cadence.”
Boundary example (redirect to founder-sales):
“We have no repeatable sales motion or ICP yet—hire a VP Sales to ‘figure it out’.”
Response: recommend founder-led discovery/validation first (use founder-sales), define readiness milestones, and return to this skill once a motion can be written down and measured.
Boundary example (redirect to sales-compensation):
“What OTE and commission structure should we offer our first AEs?”
Response: this skill designs the team, roles, and hiring process but not comp plans. Redirect to sales-compensation for OTE, pay mix, quota setting, and commission mechanics.
What ships with it: 13 files
80.3 KB alongside SKILL.md
eval/
- eval_config.json853 B
- SHOWCASE.md4.8 KB
- without_skill.md16.0 KB
- with_skill.md34.2 KB
references/
- CHECKLISTS.md2.6 KB
- EXAMPLES.md2.1 KB
- INTAKE.md1.9 KB
- RUBRIC.md4.0 KB
- SOURCE_SUMMARY.md2.2 KB
- TEMPLATES.md5.8 KB
- WORKFLOW.md3.9 KB
- README.md1.6 KB
- skillpack.json374 B
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most sales audience skills give in ~2.4k tokens
Counted across 401 of the 401 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Read product marketing context before asking questionsin 21 of 401, across 11 files
- Acknowledge competitor strengths honestlyin 18 of 401, across 7 files
- Start every page with a summaryin 15 of 401, across 4 files
- Use a single, low-friction call to actionin 15 of 401, across 7 files
- Create a single source of truth for each competitorin 14 of 401, across 3 files
- Make each follow-up email add new valuein 11 of 401, across 5 files
- Cut any sentence that does not drive a replyin 10 of 401, across 4 files
- Tie personalization directly to the problemin 10 of 401, across 4 files
- Write paragraph comparisons for each dimensionin 9 of 401, across 3 files
- Link between related competitor pagesin 9 of 401, across 3 files
- Keep subject lines short and lowercasein 9 of 401, across 3 files
- Define ideal customer profile from top customersin 9 of 401, across 3 files
Said here and by no other author read
- Ask up to 5 intake questions if context is missing
- deliver two options if data is missing
- produce a sales team build pack
- include a readiness gate decision
- choose the simplest starting team topology
- hire two reps close together
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.