agentsclimarketplace

Seo ai content check

Skill lionkiii/claude-seo-skills/skills/seo-ai-content-check

42 SEO commands for Claude Code — site audits, Ahrefs backlinks, GSC analytics, SERP research, content briefs, technical SEO, schema validation, and more

Install
npx -y skills add lionkiii/claude-seo-skills --skill seo-ai-content-check

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 20 stars20 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Detect AI-generated content using pure text analysis (no external API calls). Analyzes sentence uniformity, vocabulary diversity, repetition patterns, hedging language, paragraph uniformity, and personal experience signals. Returns a 0-100 confidence score plus flagged passages. Use when user says "AI content check", "AI detection", "AI written", "content authenticity", "AI content", "detect AI".

SKILL.md

5.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

AI Content Check

Analyzes text for AI-generated content indicators using writing pattern analysis. No external API calls — pure local text analysis.

Inputs

  • target: URL or file path.
    • If URL: fetch content with WebFetch, extract plain text from HTML body.
    • If file path: read directly with Read tool. Accepts .md, .txt, .html.
    • Strip HTML tags, navigation, headers/footers before analysis. Analyze body copy only.

Execution

Perform all 6 analysis checks, then compute the confidence score.

Check 1: Sentence Structure Uniformity (weight: 20%)

Split text into sentences on ., !, ? (ignore abbreviations like "e.g.", "vs.", "etc."). Calculate word count per sentence. Compute standard deviation of sentence lengths.

  • SD < 3 words: FLAGGED (very uniform — AI pattern)
  • SD 3-6 words: WARNING
  • SD > 6 words: PASS (natural variance)

Score: 0 if SD > 6, 50 if SD 3-6, 100 if SD < 3 (higher = more AI-like)

Check 2: Vocabulary Diversity — Type-Token Ratio (weight: 20%)

Tokenize text into lowercase words (strip punctuation). For each 500-word sliding window: Calculate TTR = unique words / total words.

  • TTR < 0.4: FLAGGED (low diversity — AI pattern)
  • TTR 0.4-0.55: WARNING
  • TTR > 0.55: PASS

If fewer than 500 words, analyze full text. Report worst window TTR. Score: 0 if TTR > 0.55, 50 if 0.4-0.55, 100 if < 0.4

Check 3: Repetition Patterns (weight: 20%)

Detect over-used AI phrases — flag any of these appearing in the text: "In conclusion", "It's worth noting", "It's important to note", "At the end of the day", "In today's digital landscape", "In today's fast-paced", "In today's modern", "Delve into", "Navigating the", "Leverage", "Cutting-edge", "Revolutionize", "Seamlessly", "Robust solution", "Comprehensive guide", "Game-changer", "Deep dive", "Unlock the potential", "Dive into"

Also detect 3+ word repeated phrases appearing 3+ times in text (using Bash grep -o). Score: 0 if 0 phrases flagged, 25 per flagged phrase (max 100)

Check 4: Hedging Language Rate (weight: 15%)

Count hedging words/phrases per 1000 words: "may", "might", "could", "perhaps", "arguably", "generally speaking", "it could be argued", "one might say", "in some cases", "typically"

  • Rate > 8 per 1000 words: FLAGGED
  • Rate 4-8: WARNING
  • Rate < 4: PASS

Score: 0 if < 4, 50 if 4-8, 100 if > 8

Check 5: Paragraph Uniformity (weight: 10%)

Split text into paragraphs (on double newlines or <p> tags). Calculate word count per paragraph. Compute standard deviation of paragraph lengths. Exclude paragraphs < 5 words (bullets, headers).

  • SD < 15 words: FLAGGED (very uniform)
  • SD 15-30: WARNING
  • SD > 30: PASS

Score: 0 if SD > 30, 50 if 15-30, 100 if < 15

Check 6: Personal Experience Signals (weight: 15%)

Detect first-person experience markers: "I tested", "I tried", "I found", "I noticed", "we found", "we tested", "in my experience", "our team", "I've been", "we've been", "personally", "my [N] years", "I recommend", "I use"

For opinion/review/guide content:

  • 0 markers found: FLAGGED (AI typically avoids personal voice)
  • 1-2 markers: NEUTRAL
  • 3+ markers: PASS (authentic human voice)

Detect content type from headings — skip this check for factual/reference content. Score: 100 if 0 markers (opinion content), 50 if 1-2, 0 if 3+

Confidence Score Calculation

Weighted average: (Check1×20 + Check2×20 + Check3×20 + Check4×15 + Check5×10 + Check6×15) / 100

  • 0-30: Likely human-written
  • 30-60: Mixed or AI-edited
  • 60-100: Likely AI-generated

Output Format

## AI Content Analysis: [filename/URL]

### Confidence Score: [N]/100 — [Likely Human / Mixed / Likely AI-Generated]

**Interpretation:** [0-30: Likely human | 30-60: Mixed/edited | 60-100: Likely AI]

### Detailed Findings

| Check | Score | Status | Detail |
|-------|-------|--------|--------|
| Sentence Uniformity | N/100 | PASS/WARN/FLAGGED | SD: N words |
| Vocabulary Diversity | N/100 | PASS/WARN/FLAGGED | TTR: N.NN |
| Repetition Patterns | N/100 | PASS/WARN/FLAGGED | N phrases detected |
| Hedging Language | N/100 | PASS/WARN/FLAGGED | N per 1000 words |
| Paragraph Uniformity | N/100 | PASS/WARN/FLAGGED | SD: N words |
| Experience Signals | N/100 | PASS/WARN/FLAGGED | N markers found |

### Flagged Passages

[Quote specific text passages that triggered flags, with explanation]

### Recommendations for Improving Authenticity

[If score > 30, specific suggestions to make content more human-like]

## Data Sources

- Source: [URL fetched via WebFetch / Local file] (no external AI detection API)

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.