agentsclimarketplace

Sql sentinel

Skill lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/sql-sentinel

热门Skills中文cn学习版+教程,提供7000+Skills,集成claude skills (11w+Star) | awesome-openclaw-skills (4w+Star) | ui-ux-pro-max-skill (4w+Star)等10余个热门Skill项目

Install
npx -y skills add lingxling/awesome-skills-cn --skill sql-sentinel

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Audit SQL for the cost & performance anti-patterns that burn warehouse credits. Scores warehouse health 0-100 and outputs a prioritized cost-reduction plan for BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift, and Postgres.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

5.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

sql-sentinel

Overview

A static-analysis skill that audits SQL for the cost & performance anti-patterns that dominate warehouse bills — SELECT *, full-table scans, non-sargable predicates, Cartesian joins, the NOT IN NULL trap, and 15 more. It scores warehouse query health 0-100 (A-F) and outputs a prioritized cost-reduction plan, each finding with a why, a concrete fix, and an estimated savings.

Built for analytics engineers (dbt, Looker), data platform teams running FinOps / "reduce cloud spend" initiatives, and anyone reviewing a SQL pull request before it hits production. Works across BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift, and Postgres. Zero dependencies, MIT licensed.

The executable engine and full rule set live in the source repository: https://github.com/takeaseatventure/sql-sentinel. Treat that repository as third-party executable code.

When to Use This Skill

  • A user writes or reviews a query for BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift, Postgres, or Spark SQL.
  • A user asks "why is this query so slow?" or "why is my warehouse bill so high?"
  • A user is about to promote a dashboard query or dbt model to production.
  • A data engineer wants a second pair of eyes before a code review or a cost-optimization sweep.
  • A team is running a "reduce cloud spend" or FinOps initiative.

How It Works

The engine splits a SQL script into statements (honoring quotes and comments), runs 20 rules over each statement, scores health 0-100 weighted by severity (critical 25, high 12, medium 5, low 1), and returns a prioritized cost-reduction plan.

Step 1: Run the audit

Install or clone the source repository only after choosing a reviewed commit, tag, or release to trust. Do not run code from a mutable default branch just because this skill links to it:

git clone https://github.com/takeaseatventure/sql-sentinel.git
cd sql-sentinel
git checkout <reviewed-commit-or-tag>
node scripts/sql-sentinel.js path/to/query.sql

Or programmatically:

const { auditSql } = require('./scripts/sql-sentinel');
const report = auditSql(yourSqlString, { dialect: 'bigquery' });
console.log(report.healthScore);      // 0-100
console.log(report.grade);            // 'A' | 'B' | 'C' | 'D' | 'E' | 'F'
console.log(report.prioritizedPlan);  // array, worst findings first

Step 2: Read the prioritized plan

The output leads with critical findings (Cartesian joins, mass DELETE) and descends to low-severity style issues. Each finding explains why it costs money and how to fix it.

Examples

Example 1: A messy dashboard query

SELECT DISTINCT *
FROM user_events, raw_logs
WHERE LOWER(event_name) LIKE '%signup%'
  AND user_id NOT IN (SELECT id FROM deleted_users)
ORDER BY created_at;

The audit scores this 17/100 (grade F) and flags 7 findings:

  • CRITICAL: comma-join produces a Cartesian product (can turn a $0.02 query into a $200 query)
  • HIGH: SELECT * forces full column scan (30-90% wasted bytes on wide tables)
  • HIGH: leading-wildcard LIKE '%signup%' defeats indexes
  • HIGH: LOWER(event_name) defeats indexes (non-sargable)
  • HIGH: NOT IN (SELECT ...) — NULL semantics hazard
  • MEDIUM: SELECT DISTINCT dedup cost
  • MEDIUM: ORDER BY without LIMIT sorts the full result

Example 2: A clean, sargable query

-- This scores 90+/100 (grade A) — no findings
SELECT id, email, created_at
FROM users
WHERE created_at >= TIMESTAMP '2026-01-01'
  AND created_at <  TIMESTAMP '2026-02-01'
ORDER BY id
LIMIT 100;

The 20 rules (ruleset v1.0.0)

RuleSeverityCatches
SQL001highSELECT * full column scan
SQL002criticalNo WHERE → full table scan
SQL003highLIKE '%term' non-sargable
SQL004highFunction on column kills index
SQL005criticalCROSS JOIN / comma-join
SQL006mediumSELECT DISTINCT dedup cost
SQL007mediumORDER BY without LIMIT
SQL008highNOT IN (SELECT ...) NULL trap
SQL009mediumImplicit type cast
SQL010lowMany ORs (use IN/UNION)
SQL011mediumCOUNT(DISTINCT) at scale (use HLL)
SQL012lowLIMIT without ORDER BY
SQL013mediumScalar subquery in SELECT
SQL014medium5+ JOINs broadcast/spill risk
SQL015highFact table, no partition filter
SQL017lowString concat in SELECT
SQL018mediumWindow OVER () no PARTITION
SQL020criticalDELETE/UPDATE without WHERE
SQL021lowSELECT * in EXISTS/IN
SQL022mediumUNION vs UNION ALL

Run the test suite to verify each rule fires on real SQL:

cd scripts && node test.js   # 26 tests, zero dependencies

Limitations

  • This is a static analyzer. It finds anti-patterns in the text of SQL; it does not read query plans, row counts, or billing. A flagged query on a 100-row table is cheap; the same query on a billion-row table is the problem the rule exists to prevent.
  • The fact-table heuristic (SQL015) keys off table names (*_events, *_log) and is advisory, not definitive.
  • It does not execute SQL — safe to run on any .sql file.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.