agentsclimarketplace

Thesis review revision

Skill lihongqing2001-gif/chinese-thesis-production-skills/skills/thesis-review-revision

Evidence-first Codex skills for guided Chinese STEM thesis production

Install
npx -y skills add lihongqing2001-gif/chinese-thesis-production-skills --skill thesis-review-revision

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 13 days oldThe repository was created 13 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Process supervisor, defense, blind-review, or journal-style comments against a Chinese thesis with traceable minimal changes. Use when comments must be mapped one by one, the latest manuscript must not be directly edited, only specified passages may change, revisions must be shown in red or as paste-ready text, or unresolved evidence and formatting issues require a separate report.

SKILL.md

2.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Thesis Review Revision

Treat each comment as a testable obligation.

Intake

  1. Preserve the authoritative manuscript and record its hash.
  2. Capture every comment verbatim with source and identifier.
  3. Split compound comments only when the mapping remains traceable.
  4. Classify each item as scientific content, evidence, figure/table, format, language, computation, or author decision.

Revision matrix

For each item record:

  • comment;
  • affected location;
  • diagnosis;
  • required evidence;
  • proposed action;
  • actual change artifact;
  • verification;
  • status;
  • unresolved reason.

Use references/revision-protocol.md.

Minimal-change rule

When the user asks for specified changes only:

  • preserve all unaffected wording;
  • produce a paste-ready replacement paragraph or a new copy;
  • use black for retained text and red for actual additions/replacements when requested;
  • do not add stylistic rewrites outside the comment scope;
  • compare output text against the baseline to detect accidental changes.

Read references/minimal-change.md.

Evidence boundary

Do not satisfy a reviewer by inventing missing data. Choose one:

  • add verified evidence;
  • narrow the claim;
  • explain the method limitation;
  • mark the item blocked and request the exact missing artifact;
  • justify retaining the original with evidence.

Tools

Convert comments into a matrix shell:

python scripts/build_revision_matrix.py comments.txt --output reports/review_matrix.csv

Record and verify the immutable baseline:

python scripts/baseline_guard.py record thesis.docx --manifest versions/review-baseline.json
python scripts/baseline_guard.py verify thesis.docx --manifest versions/review-baseline.json

Delivery

Provide:

  1. paste-ready revisions or a new tracked/red copy;
  2. a status matrix;
  3. an evidence and unresolved-issues report;
  4. baseline unchanged verification;
  5. exact instructions for manual insertion when automatic modification was not requested.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.