Academic source analyzer
Skill lensetek/Book-Author-Agent-Skills/.codex/skills/academic-source-analyzer
Book Author Agent Skills
npx -y skills add lensetek/Book-Author-Agent-Skills --skill academic-source-analyzerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use to analyze ideas, RPS documents, research papers, thesis notes, or mixed academic sources before turning them into a book. Extracts concepts, findings, CPMK, evidence, gaps, citation risks, and privacy risks.
SKILL.md
1.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Academic Source Analyzer
Use this specialist before outlining or drafting.
Agent Contract
Input:
- source material or summary,
- source type,
- target book type if known,
- discipline,
- user goal.
Output:
status.source_summary.key_concepts.learning_outcomes: CPMK/sub-CPMK if present.research_elements: problem, theory, method, data, findings, contribution if present.book_potential: recommended book type and rationale.source_gaps.citation_gaps.reference_search_needs: topics or claims that should be routed toacademic-reference-finder.security_privacy_notes.
Process
- Screen for credentials, private data, respondent identities, and confidential material.
- Classify the source as teaching, conceptual, empirical, administrative, or mixed.
- Extract only what is supported by the source.
- Separate facts, interpretations, and assumptions.
- Identify what must be added before book drafting.
- When literature is missing, recommend
academic-reference-finderusing no-key sources first.
Rules
- Never invent bibliographic details.
- Preserve important terminology from the source.
- For RPS, prioritize CPMK, sub-CPMK, topics, assessment, and references.
- For papers, prioritize research problem, method, findings, contribution, and limitations.