agentsclimarketplace

Solution design review

Skill lencamo/skills/skills/solution-design-review

Use when the user asks for an implementation plan, bug-fix approach, best solution, root-cause analysis, refactor strategy, tradeoff discussion, or wants to discuss how to solve a problem before coding.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add lencamo/skills --skill solution-design-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

3.2 KB, 639 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Solution Design Review

Use this skill before proposing or implementing a solution when the user asks for a plan, diagnosis, implementation approach, best solution, root-cause analysis, refactor strategy, or tradeoff discussion.

Use When

  • The user asks "how would you implement this?"
  • The user asks for the best solution, not just a minimal patch
  • The user asks why a bug happens and how to fix it
  • The user wants to compare implementation options
  • The task involves UI consistency, interaction state, component boundaries, architecture, or refactoring
  • A quick local patch may work but could hide a deeper ownership or design issue

Do Not Use

  • When the user clearly asks for a direct small edit and no discussion is needed
  • For purely mechanical file changes with no design decision
  • For commit message generation
  • For user-facing documentation writing

Workflow

  1. Classify the problem

    • Bug fix
    • Feature implementation
    • Refactor
    • UI/design consistency
    • Interaction or state ownership
    • Architecture or module boundary
    • Platform or runtime behavior
  2. Inspect the relevant context first

    • Read the relevant code, config, or existing patterns before proposing a solution.
    • Distinguish symptoms from root cause.
    • Do not infer from class names or surface behavior alone when rendered output, event flow, or ownership boundaries matter.
  3. Separate quick fixes from durable solutions

    • If a quick fix exists, label it as such.
    • If a better long-term solution exists, explain why it is better.
    • Do not present a workaround as the best solution.
  4. Recommend one approach

    • State the recommended solution clearly.
    • Explain the tradeoffs and blast radius.
    • Avoid overengineering small changes, but do not default to minimal edits when the user asks for the best solution.
  5. State implementation impact

    • Files or modules likely affected
    • Behavior changes
    • Compatibility or migration concerns
    • Verification plan
  6. When approved, implement the recommended approach

    • Do not silently downgrade to a quicker patch.
    • If implementation reveals a better approach, pause and explain the change before switching strategy.

Key Rules

  • Root cause before fix.
  • Ownership boundary before patch.
  • Rendered behavior before class-name assumptions.
  • Tradeoffs before recommendation.
  • Best solution means durable, maintainable, and appropriate to the project, not necessarily the largest refactor.
  • When the user explicitly asks for the best solution in a development-stage codebase, optimize for the target design even if that requires refactoring; do not bias the solution toward backward compatibility with existing code unless the user asks for compatibility.

Output

For small cases, answer with:

原因:
方案:
影响范围:
验证方式:

For larger cases, include:

问题类型:
根因判断:
可选方案:
推荐方案:
实施范围:
验证计划:

What ships with it: 1 file

2.9 KB alongside SKILL.md

docs/

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,499. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.