Review

Use when the user wants DeepSeek to review code — review a diff, PR, or repo with the cheap model, a second pair of eyes before committing — without letting it modify anything.From its SKILL.md

Install

npx -y skills add leepokai/ccseek --skill review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

1.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

review — dispatch a read-only review

DeepSeek reviews, the planner triages. Findings come back as a report; accepted fixes go through a normal implement dispatch afterwards — never in the same run.

Spec template (read-only variant)

GOAL: review <target> (repo | diff range | specific files)
CONTEXT: what the code is and where it lives; for diff reviews, the exact `git diff <range>` to run
DIMENSIONS: name them explicitly — e.g. correctness, security, docs/code consistency, robustness, performance
OUTPUT: your final message must be exactly: VERDICT (one line); FINDINGS (numbered, each = severity HIGH/MED/LOW, file:line, what is wrong, concrete fix); NITS (optional). No praise padding.
VERIFY: n/a — the report is the deliverable. Read-only checks (bash -n, linters, --help) are allowed to confirm claims before reporting them.
LIMITS: READ-ONLY — do NOT modify, create, or delete files; do NOT commit; do NOT call external services.

Dispatch and confirm

Dispatch in the background (Bash run_in_background, like every ccseek invocation) and triage when the notification arrives:

CCSEEK_JSON=1 ccseek < /path/outside/review-spec.md > out.json
jq -r '.result' out.json          # the report
git status --porcelain            # MUST be empty — confirm read-only held

Triage discipline (the planner's half)

Verify every HIGH/MED yourself before acting. Expect false positives wherever project or harness context is missing — the reviewer doesn't know your conventions or your platform's mechanisms.
Its mechanical claims are usually verified (it runs read-only checks); weight those above its architectural opinions.
Escalate to CCSEEK_MODEL=deepseek-v4-pro for subtle logic or security reviews.