Ai tracing requests
Skill lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills/skills/ai-tracing-requests
AI skills for Claude Code, Cursor, and other coding agents. Build reliable AI features with DSPy — classification, RAG, parsing, agents, and more. Just type /ai-do.
npx -y skills add lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills --skill ai-tracing-requestsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 11 stars11 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
See exactly what your AI did on a specific request. Use when you need to debug a wrong answer, trace a specific AI request, profile slow AI pipelines, find which step failed, inspect LM calls, view token usage per request, build audit trails, or understand why a customer got a bad response. Covers DSPy inspection, per-step tracing, OpenTelemetry instrumentation, and trace viewer setup., debug slow AI response, why is my AI pipeline slow, trace LLM token usage, OpenTelemetry for AI, Langfuse tracing, AI observability per request, debug wrong AI answer for specific user, which LLM call failed, latency profiling for AI, audit trail for AI decisions, inspect what the AI actually saw, per-request AI debugging, production AI request logs, DSPy inspect_history, trace AI reasoning steps.
SKILL.md
16.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
See What Your AI Did on a Specific Request
Guide the user through tracing and debugging individual AI requests. The goal: for any request, see every LM call, retrieval step, intermediate result, token count, and latency.
How tracing differs from monitoring
Monitoring (/ai-monitoring) | Tracing (this skill) | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Aggregate health across all requests | Single request, full detail |
| Question answered | "Is accuracy dropping this week?" | "Why did customer #12345 get a wrong answer at 2:14pm?" |
| Output | Scores, trends, alerts | Call traces, intermediate results, latencies |
| Timing | Periodic batch evaluation | Per-request, real-time |
Step 1: Understand the situation
Ask the user:
- What happened? A specific wrong answer, slow response, or unexpected behavior?
- What does your pipeline look like? Single module or multi-step pipeline? Which DSPy modules?
- Where is this running? Local development, staging, or production?
Then decide the approach:
| Situation | Approach |
|---|---|
| Debugging a specific wrong answer right now | Step 2: Quick debugging with dspy.inspect_history |
| Need structured tracing in a running app | Step 3: DSPy callback system |
| Need per-step timing in pipelines | Step 4: Per-step tracing |
| Need a visual trace viewer for your team | Step 5: Connect Langtrace, Phoenix, or MLflow |
| Need to find patterns across many traces | Step 6: Search and filter traces |
Step 2: Quick debugging (no extra tools needed)
Inspect the last LM calls
The fastest way to see what happened:
import dspy
# Run your program
result = my_program(question="What is our refund policy?")
# See the last 5 LM calls — shows full prompts and responses
dspy.inspect_history(n=5)
# Save history to a file for later analysis (DSPy 3.2+)
dspy.inspect_history(n=10, file_path="debug_trace.txt")
This shows:
- The full prompt sent to the LM (including system message, few-shot examples, input)
- The LM's raw response
- How DSPy parsed the response into fields
Time individual steps
import time
result = my_program(question="test")
# Quick manual timing
start = time.time()
step1_result = my_program.step1(question="test")
step1_time = time.time() - start
print(f"Step 1: {step1_time:.2f}s")
start = time.time()
step2_result = my_program.step2(context=step1_result.context, question="test")
step2_time = time.time() - start
print(f"Step 2: {step2_time:.2f}s")
JSONL trace logging
For persistent traces without any extra dependencies:
import json
import time
from datetime import datetime
class TracedProgram(dspy.Module):
"""Wraps any DSPy program to log per-step traces to JSONL."""
def __init__(self, program, log_path="traces.jsonl"):
self.program = program
self.log_path = log_path
def forward(self, **kwargs):
trace_id = datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d_%H%M%S_%f")
steps = []
start = time.time()
result = self.program(**kwargs)
total_time = time.time() - start
# Log the trace
entry = {
"trace_id": trace_id,
"timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"inputs": {k: str(v) for k, v in kwargs.items()},
"outputs": {k: str(getattr(result, k, "")) for k in result.keys()},
"total_latency_ms": round(total_time * 1000),
}
with open(self.log_path, "a") as f:
f.write(json.dumps(entry) + "\n")
return result
# Use it
traced = TracedProgram(my_program)
result = traced(question="How do refunds work?")
Step 3: DSPy callback system (recommended for structured tracing)
DSPy has a built-in callback system that hooks into every module, LM call, tool call, and adapter operation. This is the official observability API — use it instead of manual wrappers when possible.
from dspy.utils.callback import BaseCallback
class TracingCallback(BaseCallback):
def on_module_start(self, call_id, instance, inputs):
print(f"[{call_id}] Module {instance.__class__.__name__} started")
print(f" Inputs: {inputs}")
def on_module_end(self, call_id, outputs, exception):
if exception:
print(f"[{call_id}] FAILED: {exception}")
else:
print(f"[{call_id}] Outputs: {outputs}")
def on_lm_start(self, call_id, instance, inputs):
print(f"[{call_id}] LM call started")
def on_lm_end(self, call_id, outputs, exception):
print(f"[{call_id}] LM call finished")
def on_tool_start(self, call_id, instance, inputs):
print(f"[{call_id}] Tool {instance.name} called")
def on_tool_end(self, call_id, outputs, exception):
print(f"[{call_id}] Tool finished")
# Register the callback globally
dspy.configure(callbacks=[TracingCallback()])
# All DSPy calls now trigger the callback hooks automatically
result = my_program(question="test")
Available callback hooks: on_module_start/end, on_lm_start/end, on_adapter_format_start/end, on_adapter_parse_start/end, on_tool_start/end, on_evaluate_start/end.
Do not mutate input/output data inside callbacks — this can cause subtle bugs in the pipeline.
Step 4: Manual per-step tracing in pipelines
For multi-step pipelines, trace each stage separately to see exactly where things go wrong:
import json
import time
import uuid
from datetime import datetime
class StepTracer:
"""Collects per-step timing and intermediate results."""
def __init__(self):
self.steps = []
self.trace_id = str(uuid.uuid4())[:8]
def trace_step(self, name, func, **kwargs):
"""Run a step and record its inputs, outputs, and latency."""
start = time.time()
result = func(**kwargs)
latency = time.time() - start
self.steps.append({
"step": name,
"inputs": {k: str(v)[:200] for k, v in kwargs.items()},
"outputs": {k: str(getattr(result, k, ""))[:200] for k in result.keys()},
"latency_ms": round(latency * 1000),
})
return result
def summary(self):
"""Print a summary of all traced steps."""
print(f"Trace {self.trace_id}:")
total = sum(s["latency_ms"] for s in self.steps)
for step in self.steps:
pct = step["latency_ms"] / total * 100 if total > 0 else 0
print(f" {step['step']}: {step['latency_ms']}ms ({pct:.0f}%)")
print(f" Total: {total}ms")
def to_dict(self):
return {
"trace_id": self.trace_id,
"timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"steps": self.steps,
"total_latency_ms": sum(s["latency_ms"] for s in self.steps),
}
# Use in a pipeline
class TracedRAG(dspy.Module):
def __init__(self):
self.retrieve = dspy.Retrieve(k=3)
self.answer = dspy.ChainOfThought("context, question -> answer")
def forward(self, question):
tracer = StepTracer()
retrieval = tracer.trace_step("retrieve", self.retrieve, query=question)
answer = tracer.trace_step(
"answer", self.answer,
context=retrieval.passages, question=question,
)
tracer.summary()
# Trace a1b2c3d4:
# retrieve: 120ms (15%)
# answer: 680ms (85%)
# Total: 800ms
return answer
Save traces for later analysis
def save_trace(tracer, path="traces.jsonl"):
with open(path, "a") as f:
f.write(json.dumps(tracer.to_dict()) + "\n")
# Load and analyze traces
def load_traces(path="traces.jsonl"):
with open(path) as f:
return [json.loads(line) for line in f]
def find_slow_traces(traces, threshold_ms=2000):
return [t for t in traces if t["total_latency_ms"] > threshold_ms]
def find_failed_steps(traces):
return [
t for t in traces
if any("error" in str(s.get("outputs", "")).lower() for s in t["steps"])
]
Step 4b: OpenTelemetry instrumentation
For production tracing with any backend (Jaeger, Zipkin, Datadog, etc.):
from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export import BatchSpanProcessor
# Setup — do this once at app startup
provider = TracerProvider()
trace.set_tracer_provider(provider)
tracer = trace.get_tracer("my-ai-app")
class OTelTracedProgram(dspy.Module):
"""Wraps a DSPy program with OpenTelemetry spans."""
def __init__(self, program):
self.program = program
def forward(self, **kwargs):
with tracer.start_as_current_span("ai_request") as span:
span.set_attribute("ai.inputs", json.dumps({k: str(v) for k, v in kwargs.items()}))
start = time.time()
result = self.program(**kwargs)
latency = time.time() - start
span.set_attribute("ai.latency_ms", round(latency * 1000))
span.set_attribute("ai.outputs", json.dumps(
{k: str(getattr(result, k, "")) for k in result.keys()}
))
return result
Trace individual pipeline steps with OTel
class OTelTracedRAG(dspy.Module):
def __init__(self):
self.retrieve = dspy.Retrieve(k=3)
self.answer = dspy.ChainOfThought("context, question -> answer")
def forward(self, question):
with tracer.start_as_current_span("rag_pipeline") as parent:
parent.set_attribute("question", question)
with tracer.start_as_current_span("retrieve"):
retrieval = self.retrieve(query=question)
with tracer.start_as_current_span("generate_answer"):
answer = self.answer(
context=retrieval.passages, question=question
)
return answer
Step 5: Connect a trace viewer or MLflow
Option A: Langtrace (best DSPy integration)
First-class DSPy auto-instrumentation — one line to trace all LM calls:
pip install langtrace-python-sdk
from langtrace_python_sdk import langtrace
langtrace.init(api_key="your-key") # or use LANGTRACE_API_KEY env var
# That's it — all DSPy calls are now traced automatically
result = my_program(question="test")
# View traces at app.langtrace.ai
Option B: Arize Phoenix (open-source, self-hosted)
pip install arize-phoenix openinference-instrumentation-dspy
import phoenix as px
from openinference.instrumentation.dspy import DSPyInstrumentor
# Launch local trace viewer
px.launch_app() # Opens at http://localhost:6006
# Auto-instrument DSPy
DSPyInstrumentor().instrument()
# All DSPy calls are now traced
result = my_program(question="test")
Option C: Jaeger (open-source, Docker)
docker run -d -p 16686:16686 -p 4317:4317 jaegertracing/all-in-one:latest
from opentelemetry.exporter.otlp.proto.grpc.trace_exporter import OTLPSpanExporter
# Export spans to Jaeger
exporter = OTLPSpanExporter(endpoint="http://localhost:4317", insecure=True)
provider.add_span_processor(BatchSpanProcessor(exporter))
# View traces at http://localhost:16686
Option D: MLflow Tracing (comprehensive, self-hosted)
pip install -U mlflow>=2.18.0
mlflow server --backend-store-uri sqlite:///mydb.sqlite
import mlflow
mlflow.set_tracking_uri("http://127.0.0.1:5000")
mlflow.set_experiment("DSPy")
# Auto-trace all DSPy calls (LMs, retrievers, tools, modules)
mlflow.dspy.autolog()
result = my_program(question="test")
# View traces at http://127.0.0.1:5000
MLflow captures the full call tree including LM calls, retrievers, tools, and custom modules — more comprehensive than inspect_history.
Comparison
| Feature | Langtrace | Arize Phoenix | MLflow | Jaeger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSPy auto-instrumentation | Yes (built-in) | Yes (plugin) | Yes (autolog) | Manual |
| Setup effort | One line | Two lines + Docker | pip + server | Docker + manual spans |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud option | Yes | Yes | Databricks | No |
| LM call details | Prompts, tokens, cost | Prompts, tokens | Full call tree | Custom attributes |
| Best for | DSPy-first teams | Open-source + local UI | ML teams, experiment tracking | Teams already using Jaeger |
For in-depth guides: /dspy-langtrace, /dspy-phoenix, /dspy-mlflow.
Step 6: Use traces to improve your AI
Find patterns in wrong answers
# Load JSONL traces and find failures
import json
def load_traces(path="traces.jsonl"):
with open(path) as f:
return [json.loads(line) for line in f]
wrong_traces = [t for t in load_traces() if "error" in json.dumps(t).lower()]
# Check which step is most often the bottleneck
from collections import Counter
slow_steps = Counter()
for t in wrong_traces:
if t.get("steps"):
slowest = max(t["steps"], key=lambda s: s["latency_ms"])
slow_steps[slowest["step"]] += 1
print(slow_steps)
# Counter({"retrieve": 23, "answer": 7})
# -> Retrieval is the problem, not the answer generation
Build training data from failures
failed_examples = []
for t in wrong_traces:
ex = dspy.Example(
question=t.get("inputs", {}).get("question", ""),
).with_inputs("question")
failed_examples.append(ex)
# Add to training set and re-optimize
# See /ai-improving-accuracy
Gotchas
-
Building custom tracing wrappers instead of using DSPy callbacks. Claude defaults to writing manual
time.time()wrappers around each step. DSPy has a built-in callback system (BaseCallbackwithon_module_start/end,on_lm_start/end, etc.) that hooks into every operation automatically. Use it instead of reinventing tracing infrastructure. -
Using
inspect_historyin production.inspect_historyprints to stdout and only logs LM calls — it misses retriever, tool, and module-level data. For production, use the callback system or an external trace viewer (Langtrace, Phoenix, MLflow). Reserveinspect_historyfor local debugging. -
Tracing the whole request instead of individual steps. Claude wraps the entire pipeline in one timing block, which shows total latency but not which step is slow. Always trace at the step level — either with per-step callbacks or by wrapping individual modules in the
forward()method. -
Forgetting to save traces before they are needed. Claude often adds tracing after a bug is reported, but the problematic request is already gone. Add JSONL trace logging or connect a trace viewer before you need it — you cannot debug traces you did not log.
-
Mutating inputs or outputs inside callback hooks. The callback system passes live references to module inputs and outputs. Modifying them in place (e.g., truncating a field for logging) silently corrupts the pipeline data. Always copy before modifying:
inputs_copy = dict(inputs).
Additional resources
Install any skill:
npx skills add lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills --skill <name>
- For worked examples, see examples.md
- For DSPy tracing API details, see reference.md
- Use
/ai-monitoringfor aggregate health checks across all requests - Use
/ai-fixing-errorsfor code-level debugging (crashes, config issues) - Use
/ai-building-pipelinesto structure pipelines that are easy to trace - Use
/ai-improving-accuracyto optimize based on patterns found in traces - Use
/dspy-langtracefor in-depth Langtrace setup (auto-instrumentation, self-hosted) - Use
/dspy-phoenixfor in-depth Phoenix setup (local UI, evals) - Use
/dspy-mlflowfor MLflow tracing and experiment tracking - Install
/ai-doif you do not have it — it routes any AI problem to the right skill and is the fastest way to work:npx skills add lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills --skill ai-do