agentsclimarketplace

Ai redacting data

Skill lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills/skills/ai-redacting-data

AI skills for Claude Code, Cursor, and other coding agents. Build reliable AI features with DSPy — classification, RAG, parsing, agents, and more. Just type /ai-do.

Install
npx -y skills add lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills --skill ai-redacting-data

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 11 stars11 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Strip PII and sensitive data from text before processing with AI. Use when redacting personal information, GDPR compliance, anonymizing customer data, masking credit cards, redacting PHI for HIPAA, stripping emails and phone numbers, de-identifying medical records, removing names from transcripts, PII detection and replacement, building a data anonymization pipeline, sanitizing text before sending to LLMs, pre-processing sensitive documents, privacy-preserving AI pipelines.

SKILL.md

11.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Redacting PII and Sensitive Data with DSPy

Strip personal information and sensitive data from text before it reaches an LM — or before it leaves your system.

Step 1 - Understand What to Redact

Before writing code, answer three questions:

  1. What PII types? Names, emails, phones, SSNs, credit cards, addresses, dates of birth, IP addresses, medical record numbers (MRNs), or all of the above.
  2. Replacement strategy? See the table in Step 3.
  3. Compliance requirement? GDPR (EU personal data), HIPAA (US health data), PCI-DSS (payment data), or internal policy.

The answers drive which pipeline path you need.


Step 2 - Set Up DSPy

import dspy
import re
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Literal

lm = dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini")  # or "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", etc.
dspy.configure(lm=lm)

Step 3 - Replacement Strategies

StrategyExample outputBest for
Category placeholder[EMAIL], [PHONE]Readability, compliance audits
Indexed placeholder[PERSON_1], [PERSON_2]Preserving co-references across text
Hash[a3f9…]Pseudonymization, re-linkable with key
Synthetic / fakeJohn SmithAlex TurnerTesting pipelines with realistic-looking data
Blank / mask████████Display-layer redaction

Step 4 - Choose Your Approach

ApproachWhen to useTradeoff
Regex onlyEmails, SSNs, credit cards, phones — fixed-format PIIFast, deterministic, zero LM cost; misses names and free-form data
LM onlyUnstructured text, multilingual names, complex contextHigh recall on contextual PII; slow, costly, and sends raw PII to the LM
Two-pass (recommended)Mixed text with both structured and contextual PIIRegex first masks structured PII so the LM never sees raw values; best recall + lowest exposure

The examples below use the two-pass pattern. Use regex-only when all PII is structured and you cannot afford any LM calls.

Step 5 - Regex First for Structured Patterns

Regex is fast, deterministic, and never sends PII to an external API. Always run it before the LM pass.

# Patterns for structured PII
PATTERNS = {
    "EMAIL":       re.compile(r'\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+\-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.\-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b'),
    "PHONE":       re.compile(r'\b(\+?1[-.\s]?)?(\(?\d{3}\)?[-.\s]?\d{3}[-.\s]?\d{4})\b'),
    "SSN":         re.compile(r'\b\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{4}\b'),
    "CREDIT_CARD": re.compile(r'\b(?:\d{4}[-\s]?){3}\d{4}\b'),
    "IP_ADDRESS":  re.compile(r'\b\d{1,3}(?:\.\d{1,3}){3}\b'),
    "DATE_OF_BIRTH": re.compile(r'\b(?:DOB|Date of Birth|born)[:\s]+\d{1,2}[/\-]\d{1,2}[/\-]\d{2,4}\b', re.IGNORECASE),
    "ZIP_CODE":    re.compile(r'\b\d{5}(?:-\d{4})?\b'),
}

@dataclass
class PIIMatch:
    pii_type: str
    value: str
    start: int
    end: int

def regex_detect(text: str) -> list[PIIMatch]:
    matches = []
    for pii_type, pattern in PATTERNS.items():
        for m in pattern.finditer(text):
            matches.append(PIIMatch(pii_type=pii_type, value=m.group(), start=m.start(), end=m.end()))
    return matches

Step 6 - LM Signature for Contextual PII

Use the LM only for PII that requires reading context — names, addresses, and other free-form entities.

class DetectContextualPII(dspy.Signature):
    """Identify personal information in text that requires context to detect.
    Return a JSON list of objects with fields: pii_type, value.
    PII types to detect - PERSON_NAME, ADDRESS, MEDICAL_RECORD_NUMBER, ORG_NAME (when linked to a person).
    Do not flag generic words that happen to resemble names."""

    text: str = dspy.InputField(desc="Text to scan for personal information")
    pii_entities: list[dict] = dspy.OutputField(
        desc='JSON list - [{"pii_type": "PERSON_NAME", "value": "Jane Doe"}, ...]'
    )

detect_pii = dspy.Predict(DetectContextualPII)

Step 7 - Full Redaction Module

class PIIRedactor(dspy.Module):
    def __init__(self, strategy: Literal["placeholder", "indexed", "blank"] = "placeholder"):
        self.strategy = strategy
        self.detect = dspy.Predict(DetectContextualPII)

    def _make_replacement(self, pii_type: str, entity_index: dict) -> str:
        if self.strategy == "indexed":
            key = pii_type
            n = entity_index.get(key, 0) + 1
            entity_index[key] = n
            return f"[{pii_type}_{n}]"
        elif self.strategy == "blank":
            return "████"
        else:
            return f"[{pii_type}]"

    def forward(self, text: str) -> dspy.Prediction:
        entity_index: dict[str, int] = {}
        seen: dict[str, str] = {}  # value → replacement (for consistency)

        # Pass 1 - regex for structured patterns
        regex_hits = regex_detect(text)

        # Pass 2 - LM for contextual PII (only send text with structured PII pre-masked)
        pre_masked = text
        for hit in sorted(regex_hits, key=lambda h: h.start, reverse=True):
            pre_masked = pre_masked[:hit.start] + f"[{hit.pii_type}]" + pre_masked[hit.end:]

        lm_result = self.detect(text=pre_masked)
        lm_entities = lm_result.pii_entities or []

        # Build replacement map from LM entities
        for entity in lm_entities:
            val = entity.get("value", "")
            pii_type = entity.get("pii_type", "PII")
            if val and val not in seen:
                seen[val] = self._make_replacement(pii_type, entity_index)

        # Apply LM replacements to original text
        redacted = text
        for val, replacement in sorted(seen.items(), key=lambda kv: len(kv[0]), reverse=True):
            redacted = redacted.replace(val, replacement)

        # Apply regex replacements
        for hit in sorted(regex_hits, key=lambda h: h.start, reverse=True):
            if hit.value not in seen:
                seen[hit.value] = self._make_replacement(hit.pii_type, entity_index)

        # Re-apply to get a clean final pass
        final = text
        for val, replacement in sorted(seen.items(), key=lambda kv: len(kv[0]), reverse=True):
            final = final.replace(val, replacement)

        return dspy.Prediction(
            redacted_text=final,
            entities_found=seen,
        )

Step 8 - Validate Redaction Quality

Do not use dspy.Assert or dspy.Suggest here — they are deprecated. Use dspy.Refine with a reward function.

class ValidateRedaction(dspy.Signature):
    """Check whether any PII survived redaction. Return True if clean, False if PII remains."""

    original_text: str = dspy.InputField()
    redacted_text: str = dspy.InputField()
    is_clean: bool = dspy.OutputField(desc="True if no PII remains, False otherwise")
    leaked_examples: list[str] = dspy.OutputField(desc="Examples of PII that leaked through, empty list if clean")

def redaction_reward(example, prediction, trace=None) -> float:
    validator = dspy.Predict(ValidateRedaction)
    result = validator(
        original_text=example.text,
        redacted_text=prediction.redacted_text,
    )
    return 1.0 if result.is_clean else 0.0

Step 9 - GDPR and HIPAA Compliance Patterns

GDPR - Right to erasure

# Store the entity map so you can reverse-map or fully erase later
redactor = PIIRedactor(strategy="indexed")
result = redactor(text=document)
# Persist result.entities_found keyed by document ID
# On erasure request - delete the mapping; ciphertext becomes permanently anonymized

HIPAA - Safe Harbor de-identification

HIPAA Safe Harbor requires removing 18 PHI identifiers. Add these patterns:

HIPAA_PATTERNS = {
    "MRN":        re.compile(r'\bMRN[:\s#]+\w+\b', re.IGNORECASE),
    "NPI":        re.compile(r'\bNPI[:\s#]+\d{10}\b', re.IGNORECASE),
    "DEVICE_ID":  re.compile(r'\b(?:device|serial)[:\s#]+[A-Z0-9\-]{6,}\b', re.IGNORECASE),
    "URL":        re.compile(r'https?://\S+'),
    "ACCOUNT":    re.compile(r'\baccount[:\s#]+\w+\b', re.IGNORECASE),
}
PATTERNS.update(HIPAA_PATTERNS)

Step 10 - When NOT to Use AI Redaction

  • Structured fields with known formats - regex alone is sufficient and faster (emails, SSNs, credit cards).
  • Already-tokenized data - if PII was never collected as free text, there is nothing to redact.
  • When you can avoid collecting PII in the first place - the best redaction is prevention.
  • High-stakes legal documents without human review - LM redaction can miss things; always add a human-in-the-loop audit step for compliance filings.

Key Patterns

# Quick usage
redactor = PIIRedactor(strategy="indexed")
result = redactor(text="Call Jane Doe at 555-123-4567 or [email protected]")
print(result.redacted_text)
# "Call [PERSON_NAME_1] at [PHONE_1] or [EMAIL]"
print(result.entities_found)
# {"Jane Doe": "[PERSON_NAME_1]", "555-123-4567": "[PHONE_1]", "[email protected]": "[EMAIL]"}

Gotchas

  • The LM sees the PII you are trying to hide - sending raw text to an external LM for detection defeats the purpose if the PII itself is sensitive. Run regex first and send only the pre-masked text to the LM, or use a locally hosted model.

  • Common words misidentified as names - Claude flags "Will" (a verb), "Mark" (a noun), "Faith" (a concept) as PERSON_NAME. Prompt the signature to exclude words that are clearly not names in context, and validate detections against a stoplist.

  • Inconsistent placeholders break co-reference - without a seen mapping dict, the same person can appear as [PERSON_1] in paragraph 1 and [PERSON_2] in paragraph 3. Always deduplicate entity values before assigning replacements.

  • Non-English and transliterated names are missed - Claude's contextual PII detection is weakest on names from languages with different romanization conventions (e.g., Chinese pinyin, Arabic transliteration). Add language-specific name lists or a multilingual NER model for those cases.

  • Using dspy.Assert/dspy.Suggest for validation is outdated - those APIs are removed in DSPy 2.5+. Use dspy.Refine with a reward function as shown in Step 7.


Cross-References

Install any skill: npx skills add lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills --skill <name>

  • /ai-parsing-data - extract structured fields from text (complementary pattern)
  • /ai-checking-outputs - validate that outputs meet quality criteria
  • /dspy-refine - iterative refinement with a reward function for validation loops
  • /dspy-retrieval - if you need to redact before indexing documents
  • Install /ai-do if you do not have it — it routes any AI problem to the right skill and is the fastest way to work: npx skills add lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills --skill ai-do

Additional Resources

  • For DSPy API signatures and parameter tables, see reference.md
  • For worked examples, see examples.md:
    1. Customer support email redactor
    2. Medical record de-identifier (HIPAA Safe Harbor)
    3. Pre-LLM sanitizer for third-party API calls

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.