Leadup deploy checker
Skill leadupofficial/leadup-claude-skills/leadup-deploy-checker
LeadUp Claude Skills Pack — 12 self-contained Claude skills for the LeadUp Technologies workflow (kickoff, repo analysis, API research, deploy checks, security review, premium UI, status, content, client docs).
npx -y skills add leadupofficial/leadup-claude-skills --skill leadup-deploy-checkerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Check whether a LeadUp project is ready to deploy to leadup-server / Coolify. Verifies Docker build, env variable coverage, ports, Coolify config, GitHub branch, domain/subdomain, migrations, and a rollback plan, then outputs a READY / NOT READY verdict. Use when the user says "prepare deploy", "deploy checker", "make Docker work", "Coolify deploy", "leadup-server deploy", or "production ready".
SKILL.md
5.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
LeadUp Deploy Checker
Purpose
Determine if a project can be deployed safely and produce an exact readiness report. This skill checks and plans only — it never runs the deploy or pushes. Deploy happens after explicit approval.
When to use
Trigger phrases: "prepare deploy", "deploy checker", "is this production ready", "make Docker work", "Coolify deploy", "leadup-server deploy", "can we ship this", "pre-deploy check".
For security posture specifically → leadup-security-review (deploy-checker
includes a security gate but defers deep auditing to it).
Inputs needed
- The repo path and target
*.leadup.insubdomain. - Intended branch (usually
main) and Coolify service expectations. - Whether this is first deploy or an update (affects rollback/migrations).
Step-by-step workflow
Use references/deploy-checklist.md.
Deploy target vs. backend: If the project only uses Coolify as a downstream provisioning backend (and itself ships another way — e.g. Docker Compose + rsync to leadup-server), evaluate the project's actual deploy path, not Coolify. Confirm the real target from
DEPLOY.md/ compose files before running the checklist.
- Build & run: Dockerfile builds clean; app serves; prod build succeeds; no dev/localhost URLs in prod paths.
- Environment:
.env.examplecovers every required key (placeholders);DEPLOY.mddocuments them; no secrets in image/repo/bundle. - Ports & networking: correct exposed port; no collision with other
*.leadup.inapps; reverse-proxy/subdomain planned. - Domain & TLS: subdomain decided, DNS planned, TLS via Coolify.
- Data: migrations idempotent; persistent volumes mapped (uploads/db); no weak default admin.
- Source control: correct branch under
leadupofficial; tree clean. - Rollback: previous tag/commit recorded; rollback steps in
DEPLOY.md. - Verdict + stop: output READY/NOT READY with failing items and the exact commands the user runs. Do not deploy or push.
Required output format
- Verdict: READY ✅ / NOT READY ❌.
- Checklist results — each section pass/fail with evidence.
- Blocking items — what must be fixed first, with the fix command.
- Deploy commands the user will run (for them to execute, not you).
- Rollback plan — explicit.
- Approval gate: "Awaiting your approval to deploy — I will not push or deploy."
Safety rules
See references/security-rules.md and deploy-checklist.md. Most relevant:
- Never run
git push,coolifydeploy, or remote SSH — output commands and stop for approval. - Never put real env values in
.env.exampleorDEPLOY.md. - Block deploy if secrets are in the image/repo or if data volumes aren't persisted (deploy would wipe data).
Common mistakes
- Marking READY while
.env.exampleis missing required keys. - Forgetting persistent volumes → uploads/DB wiped on next deploy.
- Port collision with another app already on
leadup-server. - No rollback target recorded before an update deploy.
- Evaluating the Coolify deploy path when the project only uses Coolify as a provisioning backend and actually ships via Docker Compose / rsync.
- Actually running the deploy/push instead of stopping at the gate.
Troubleshooting
- Under-triggers: user said "ship it" — re-invoke; suggest trigger phrases.
- Over-triggers for a deep security audit → route to
leadup-security-review. - Missing tool/MCP: if Docker can't be run here, give the exact commands for the user to run and check their pasted output.
- No internet/browser: fine — checks are local/config; defer DNS/TLS verification with a note.
- Missing project files (
Dockerfile/DEPLOY.mdabsent): mark NOT READY, list them as blockers, offer to scaffold from kickoff assets. - Build/test failure: capture error, classify (deps/env/Docker), mark NOT READY; never disable checks to force a READY verdict.
Test prompts
Should trigger (5)
- "Is the jewellery SaaS production ready for Coolify?"
- "Prepare deploy for the venus school site to leadup-server."
- "Deploy checker on the salon repo before we ship."
- "Make Docker work and tell me if we can deploy."
- "Pre-deploy check for app.leadup.in."
Should NOT trigger (3)
- "Do a full security audit of the payments code." (→ security-review)
- "Browser test the login flow." (→ browser-playwright-tester)
- "Update STATUS.md after deploy." (→ status-updater)
Functional test cases (2)
- On a repo with a working Dockerfile but missing volumes, verdict is NOT READY with "persistent volumes" as a blocker.
- The output ends with the approval gate line and performs no push/deploy.
Success criteria
- Every checklist section evaluated with evidence.
- Clear READY/NOT READY verdict + concrete blocking fixes.
- Rollback plan stated; commands provided for the user to run.
- No push, no deploy, no remote command executed.