agentsclimarketplace

Crm toolkit

Skill LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/tools/crm-toolkit

205 production GTM agent skills for Claude Code — sales, outbound, prospecting, RevOps, ABM, PLG, CS, automation. Framework-cited playbooks with artifacts + QA scripts.

Install
npx -y skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill crm-toolkit

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

CRM operations anchor — HubSpot, Salesforce, and Attio selection, contacts vs leads object model, platform blueprints, enrichment integration, implementation partners, pipeline design, and data hygiene. Use when choosing a CRM, setting up Attio/HubSpot/Salesforce, resolving Lead vs Contact architecture, or hiring CRM implementation help. Triggers on: "CRM setup", "HubSpot vs Salesforce", "Attio vs HubSpot", "contacts vs leads", "Salesforce leads", "CRM migration", "CRM implementation partner", "CRM blueprint".

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

9.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

CRM Toolkit

Overview

Most CRM failures are architecture mistakes, not missing features: wrong platform for stage, Lead/Contact confusion, enrichment synced both ways, or fifteen pipeline stages nobody inspects. This skill is the anchor for CRM work in gtm-skills — selection, object model, platform blueprints, partners, and hygiene — with rollout delegated to hubspot-setup, salesforce-setup, and attio-setup.

Tool vs process: tools/crm-toolkit = config reference and blueprints. automation/crm-integration + platform setup skills = operating model and rollout.

When to Use

RequestStart hereThen load
"Which CRM should we use?"references/crm-selection.mdsaas-outcomes if bootstrap vs venture
"Contacts vs leads in Salesforce"references/contacts-vs-leads.mdsalesforce-setup
"Set up HubSpot pipeline"references/hubspot-blueprint.mdhubspot-setup
"Set up Attio"references/attio-blueprint.mdattio-setup
"Migrate HubSpot → Salesforce"references/contacts-vs-leads.md + blueprintsreferences/implementation-partners.md
"CRM agency / SI partner"references/implementation-partners.mdhiring-agencies
"Enrichment → CRM"Enrichment section belowclay-toolkit, leadmagic-toolkit

Trigger phrases: "CRM toolkit", "CRM setup", "Attio setup deep", "HubSpot vs Attio", "Salesforce leads", "contact vs lead", "CRM partner", "RevOps agency CRM"

Authoritative Foundations

  • Winning by Design — Bowtie. Model pre- and post-sale in CRM: not pipeline-only.
  • HubSpot. Single Contact + lifecycle stages — no separate Lead object.
  • Salesforce. Lead quarantine → convert → Account + Contact + Opportunity.
  • Marc Benioff (Salesforce). V2MOM alignment, trust-based enterprise selling, land-and-expand in CRM, customer success as revenue function — references/benioff-enterprise-playbook.md.
  • Attio. Flat objects; qualification via attributes and lists as queues.

Step-by-Step Process

Phase 1 — Operating Model (before software)

Load crm-integration if not done. Minimum:

  • GTM motion defined (inbound, outbound, PLG, hybrid)
  • 5–7 deal stages with Goal + Exit Criteria (pipeline-management)
  • Owner per stage (SDR vs AE vs CS)
  • Dedupe key: email (people), domain (companies)

Phase 2 — Platform Selection

Use references/crm-selection.md scorecard.

ARR / teamDefault recommendation
<$1M ARR, founder-ledAttio or HubSpot Starter
$1–10M ARR, sales-ledHubSpot Pro
$10M+ ARR, territoriesHubSpot Enterprise or Salesforce
Enterprise procurementSalesforce

Phase 3 — Contacts vs Leads

Mandatory read: references/contacts-vs-leads.md

PlatformModel
SalesforceLead object optional but default for SDR + inbound quarantine
HubSpotLifecycle stages on Contact — never duplicate "lead" records
Attiostatus on People + dynamic lists — no conversion ceremony

Phase 4 — Platform Blueprint

PlatformBlueprintSetup skill
HubSpotreferences/hubspot-blueprint.mdhubspot-setup
Salesforcereferences/salesforce-blueprint.mdsalesforce-setup
Attioreferences/attio-blueprint.mdattio-setup

Index: references/platform-setup-index.md

Phase 5 — Enrichment Integration

One-direction: Clay / LeadMagic → CRM. Never two-way Clay ↔ CRM sync.

EventPattern
Contact/Person createdWebhook or workflow → enrich → write properties
Inbound formEnrich before assignment
Quarterly hygieneRe-verify email; refresh firmographics on Tier A accounts

Skills: leadmagic-toolkit (verify), clay-toolkit (waterfall), n8n-toolkit (routing).

Phase 6 — Implementation Partners

If estimated config > 40 hours or Salesforce net-new:

  1. Document process (pipeline-management, crm-integration)
  2. Read references/implementation-partners.md
  3. Run 90-day pilot with scorecard (hiring-agencies)

Phase 7 — Enterprise Motion (Salesforce / land-expand)

When enterprise or NRR-led growth is the motion, load references/benioff-enterprise-playbook.md:

  • V2MOM cascade from company vision → GTM measures (gtm-leadership)
  • Land opp + expansion opps on same Account (templates/land-expand-account-plan.md)
  • CS health, renewal, and success criteria in CRM — not pipeline-only

Phase 8 — Data Hygiene

RuleImplementation
No person without emailRequired field / validation
No open deal without amount + close dateStage validation
Duplicate detectionEmail match; domain for companies
Stale deals60d same stage → task or auto-close policy
Enrich on createDefault for all inbound

Platform Comparison (Summary)

HubSpotSalesforceAttio
Best forSMB–mid market, marketing+salesEnterprise, complex GTMStartups, API-first, PLG assist
Lead modelLifecycle on ContactLead → convertstatus + lists
Admin loadLow–mediumHighLow
MarketingNativeSeparate cloudsExternal / webhooks
ImplementationPartner optionalPartner requiredSelf-serve + contractor

Full matrix: references/crm-selection.md

Output Format

Deliver based on request:

  • CRM selection memo: Scorecard + recommendation + 12-month path
  • Object model doc: Contacts vs leads decision with field map
  • Blueprint package: Stages, properties, workflows for chosen platform
  • Migration plan: Source → target mapping, hygiene gates, parallel run
  • Partner RFP: Scope from references/implementation-partners.md checklist

Quality Check

  • Platform choice tied to ARR, motion, and admin capacity
  • Contacts vs leads documented — no hybrid confusion
  • 5–7 stages with exit criteria
  • Enrichment one-direction into CRM
  • Partner engagement only if process documented
  • Setup skill named for rollout (hubspot-setup, etc.)

Common Pitfalls

  1. Salesforce Leads in HubSpot. HubSpot uses lifecycle — don't create parallel objects.
  2. CRM before process. Stages undefined → reps invent their own. Fix pipeline-management first.
  3. Two-way Clay sync. Conflicts and overwritten fields. One-way push only.
  4. Salesforce at $500K ARR. Admin tax without RevOps owner. Use Attio/HubSpot until $5M+.
  5. Agency without playbook. Partners configure chaos faster. Document first.

Execution Artifacts

| references/framework-notes.md | Framework anchors | | templates/output-template.md | Deliverable structure | | scripts/check-output.py | Section validator |

FileUse
references/crm-selection.mdHubSpot vs Salesforce vs Attio
references/contacts-vs-leads.mdLead/Contact architecture
references/hubspot-blueprint.mdHubSpot fields + workflows
references/salesforce-blueprint.mdSF objects + Lead convert
references/attio-blueprint.mdAttio lists + status model
references/implementation-partners.mdSIs, RevOps agencies, RFP
references/platform-setup-index.mdSkill routing table
references/benioff-enterprise-playbook.mdV2MOM, trust, land-expand, CS in CRM
templates/land-expand-account-plan.mdAccount expansion whitespace

Related Skills

  • crm-integration — lifecycle, field ownership, sync rules
  • hubspot-setup / salesforce-setup / attio-setup — rollout
  • pipeline-management — stage design
  • hiring-agencies — agency pilot for RevOps/CRM
  • saas-outcomes — bootstrap vs venture; CRM tier by path
  • revops-tech-stack — full GTM stack context

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.