Ai prompts toolkit
205 production GTM agent skills for Claude Code — sales, outbound, prospecting, RevOps, ABM, PLG, CS, automation. Framework-cited playbooks with artifacts + QA scripts.
npx -y skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill ai-prompts-toolkitAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
GTM AI prompt library and prompt-loop patterns — Claygent research, LLM scoring, cold email drafts, reply classification, account briefs, and iterate-until-quality workflows for sales and marketing. Use when writing Clay AI prompts, designing prompt chains, or building research→draft→score loops in Clay, n8n, or Jesse. Triggers on: "GTM prompts", "Claygent prompt", "AI prompt loop", "cold email prompt", "reply classification prompt", "LLM column Clay", "prompt chain GTM", "research prompt sales".
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
7.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
AI Prompts Toolkit
Overview
Generic AI prompts produce generic GTM output — invented personalization, pattern-guessed emails, and hallucinated metrics. GTM prompts need constraints: source URLs, word limits, banned claims, ICP context, and explicit failure behavior when data is missing.
This skill is the GTM prompt library: copy-paste prompts for Claygent, Clay AI columns, n8n LLM nodes, and Jesse agents — plus prompt loops that iterate research → draft → score → revise until quality gates pass.
When to Use
- "Write a Claygent prompt for [task]"
- "GTM prompt for cold email personalization"
- "Reply classification prompt"
- "Prompt loop for account research"
- "LLM column in Clay for ICP scoring"
- "AI prompt chain for outbound"
Load gtm-context first if ICP/positioning is undefined — prompts without
context hallucinate.
Authoritative Foundations
- Anthropic — Prompt Engineering. Separate instructions from data; specify output format; define what to do when information is missing (return empty, not guess).
- Clay Claygent. Web research agent — must require
source_urlon every factual claim. Credit-heavy — use only after structured enrich fails. - SPICED (WbD). Discovery and research prompts map to Situation, Pain, Impact, Critical Event, Decision — not free-form summaries.
- MEDDICC (Whyte). Research prompts for enterprise deals extract evidence for Metrics, Champion, Economic Buyer — score confidence 0/1/2.
Prompt Design Rules (All GTM Prompts)
- Role + task — one sentence each
- Input variables — name every field (
{{company}},{{domain}}) - Output format — JSON or markdown template with required keys
- Constraints — word limits, banned phrases, no invented stats
- Missing data — "If unknown, return
null— do not guess" - Source requirement — factual claims need
source_url
GTM Prompt Catalog
Load full copy-paste prompts from references/prompt-library.md.
| Prompt ID | Use Case | Tool |
|---|---|---|
P01 | Account snapshot (SPICED) | Claygent / LLM |
P02 | Work email find (no guess) | Claygent |
P03 | Signal line for cold email | LLM column |
P04 | Full cold email draft | LLM column |
P05 | Email quality score (1–10) | LLM column |
P06 | Reply classify (interested/objection/OOO) | LLM / n8n |
P07 | ICP fit score with reasoning | LLM column |
P08 | Meeting brief pre-call | Jesse / LLM |
P09 | Champion identification | Claygent |
P10 | Competitor mention extractor | Claygent |
Prompt Loops (GTM)
Prompt loops chain multiple AI steps with gates between them.
Loop 1: Research → Brief (account prep)
Step 1 P01 Account snapshot →
Step 2 Gap check (missing Pain/CE?) →
Step 3 Targeted Claygent fill (only gaps) →
Step 4 Merge into meeting brief
Gate: Critical Event present OR flag manual review
Loop 2: Signal → Draft → Score → Revise (outbound)
Step 1 Enrichment + signal detect →
Step 2 P03 signal line (source required) →
Step 3 P04 email draft (<90 words) →
Step 4 P05 quality score →
Step 5 IF score <7: P04 revise with feedback (max 2 iterations) →
Step 6 IF score ≥7: route to human review queue
Gate: no send without human approval (pilot mode)
Loop 3: Enrich → ICP Score → Route
Step 1 Waterfall enrich →
Step 2 P07 ICP score →
Step 3 Route: ≥80 sequencer queue | 50–79 SDR review | <50 archive
Gate: suppression list check before route
Loop 4: Inbound Reply → Classify → Route
Step 1 P06 classify reply →
Step 2 Map to playbook (interested→AE, objection→`reply-handling`, OOO→pause) →
Step 3 CRM task + Slack alert
Gate: positive intent → human handoff within 1 business day
Use templates/prompt-loop-blueprint.md to document custom loops.
Example: P04 Cold Email Draft (abbreviated)
You write B2B cold emails for {{company_selling}}.
INPUT:
- Prospect: {{first_name}} {{last_name}}, {{title}} at {{company}}
- Signal: {{signal}} (source: {{source_url}})
- ICP pain: {{icp_pain}}
- Proof point: {{proof_point}} (must be factual)
RULES:
- Under 90 words
- One pain, one proof, one CTA
- No "I hope this finds you well", no invented metrics
- If signal or proof is empty, write generic ICP pain only — do not invent signal
OUTPUT JSON:
{"subject":"","body":"","personalization_source":"","word_count":0}
Full prompts in references/prompt-library.md.
Output Format
Deliverable: prompt spec or loop blueprint with prompt IDs, variable map, quality gates, iteration limits, credit budget (Claygent), and integration point (Clay column, n8n node, or agent skill).
Quality Check
- Every prompt has role, inputs, output format, constraints, missing-data rule
- Factual prompts require
source_urlin output - Loops have explicit gates and max iteration counts
- Outbound loops include human review gate before send
- Prompts reference ICP/positioning from
gtm-context— not generic SaaS - Claygent prompts prohibit email pattern-guessing
- Reply loop maps to
reply-handlingcategories
Common Pitfalls
-
"Find their email" Claygent prompts. 40–60% bounce from guessed patterns. Fix: require source URL; return empty if not found.
-
Unbounded revise loops. LLM iterates forever, burns credits. Fix: max 2 revisions; then human queue.
-
No quality scorer between steps. Bad drafts propagate. Fix: P05 score gate ≥7 before human review.
-
Prompt without suppression context. AI contacts opted-out accounts. Fix: pass
suppressed: true/false; halt if true. -
One prompt does everything. Research + draft + send in one call = errors. Fix: use prompt loops with narrow steps.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— design rules and SPICED/MEDDICC mappingtemplates/output-template.md— Primary deliverable shellscripts/check-output.py— validates prompt specs and loop blueprintsreferences/prompt-library.md— full GTM prompt catalog (P01–P10+)references/prompt-loop-patterns.md— loop diagrams and gate rulestemplates/prompt-spec.md— single prompt documentation templatetemplates/prompt-loop-blueprint.md— multi-step loop template
Related Skills
clay-toolkit— Where LLM columns and Claygent live in tablesclay-loops-toolkit— Scheduled signal loops using these promptscold-email-copywriting— Message strategy behind P03/P04meeting-prep— Consumes P01/P08 outputreply-handling— Playbook for P06 routingai-sdr-setup— Guardrails for automated prompt loops