Sales enablement
Skill LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/sales-revops/sales-enablement
205 production GTM agent skills for Claude Code — sales, outbound, prospecting, RevOps, ABM, PLG, CS, automation. Framework-cited playbooks with artifacts + QA scripts.
npx -y skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill sales-enablementAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Create sales collateral that reps actually use — pitch decks, one-pagers, battlecards, objection docs, demo scripts, talk tracks, and playbooks. Use when the user wants to create sales materials, build a pitch deck, write a one-pager, create objection handling docs, or arm their sales team. Triggers on: "sales enablement", "pitch deck", "one-pager", "sales collateral", "battlecard", "sales deck", "objection doc", "sales playbook", "demo script", "leave-behind", "talk track", or any request about creating materials for sales teams.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
8.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Sales Enablement
Overview
Sales enablement materials are tools, not documents. If a rep can't find the right asset in 30 seconds during a call, it might as well not exist. The best enablement is concise, persona-specific, and structured for rapid access.
This skill coordinates the creation of a complete sales enablement package:
pitch deck, one-pagers per persona, objection handling docs, demo scripts,
and a GTM playbook aligned to the sales process defined in pipeline-management.
Load pipeline-management first if no stage definitions exist — enablement
assets must map to specific stages (Goal, Actions, Exit Criteria) and SPICED
fields, not float as disconnected PDFs.
When to Use
- "Create a sales enablement package for our new product"
- "Build a pitch deck"
- "Write a one-pager for our champion"
- "Create objection handling docs"
- "Build a sales playbook"
- "Arm our reps with competitive materials"
Authoritative Foundations
- Winning by Design — GTM Playbook Development Kit. The sales playbook is the operational layer of the sales process. Each playbook section maps to a pipeline stage: what to do (Actions), what evidence to capture (Exit Criteria), and which SPICED questions to ask. Reps use the playbook; managers inspect against the same criteria in deal reviews.
- Winning by Design — SPICED. Discovery questions, demo framing, and proposal language should elicit Situation, Pain, Impact, Critical Event, and Decision — organized by stage, not as a flat script.
- Force Management — Command of the Message. Before Scenario → PBOs → Required Capabilities → Defensible Differentiators. Every asset traces to this for message consistency across deck, one-pager, and battlecard.
- Corporate Visions. "Why change" → "why you" → "why now" progression converts better than feature-forward presentations.
Prerequisites
- Positioning and messaging defined (use positioning-messaging)
- ICP and personas documented (use icp-scoring)
- Competitive intelligence gathered (use competitive-intel)
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Asset Inventory
Determine what's needed:
| Asset | Audience | Purpose | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pitch Deck (10-15 slides) | Prospects, demos | Present value, drive to next step | Highest |
| One-Pagers (per persona) | Champions, post-meeting | Enable internal selling | High |
| Battlecards (per competitor) | Reps in competitive deals | Win competitive situations | High |
| Objection Handling Doc | Reps on every call | Handle pushback confidently | High |
| Demo Script | Reps running demos | Consistent, compelling demos | High |
| ROI Calculator | Economic buyers, CFOs | Quantify value | Medium |
| Case Studies (sales format) | Late-stage prospects | Prove results | Medium |
| Sales Playbook | All reps, onboarding | Central reference for everything | Medium |
Phase 2: Asset Creation by Persona
Every asset should be persona-aware. A deck for a CTO has different content, examples, and proof points than one for a VP of Sales.
| Persona | Key Concerns | Relevant Proof | Deck Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTO / VP Eng | Integration, security, scalability | Technical case study, architecture diagram | Technical depth |
| VP Sales / CRO | Revenue impact, ramp time, adoption | Revenue metrics, rep productivity data | Business impact |
| CEO / Founder | Strategic, defensible growth | Market positioning, competitive moat | Vision + outcomes |
| Champion (internal) | Easy to sell internally, safe choice | One-pager, internal memo template | Enablement |
Phase 3: GTM Playbook Structure (WbD-Aligned)
The playbook mirrors pipeline-management stage definitions. Structure by stage:
| Playbook Section | Maps To | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| ICP & Personas | Pre-Target | Who we sell to, disqualifiers |
| Stage 1–2: Target & Connect | Target, Connect | Outreach templates, Situation questions |
| Stage 3: Discovery | Discovery | SPICED question bank, Impact quantification |
| Stage 4: Solution | Solution | Demo scripts per persona, Champion development |
| Stage 5–6: Proposal & Negotiate | Proposal, Negotiation | Pricing talk track, Andy Whyte MEDDICC scorecard (0/1/2), Champion test card |
| Objection Handling | All stages | Top objections by stage, not generic list |
| Competitive Positioning | Solution onward | Battlecards with talk tracks |
| Handoff to CS | Closed Won | AE → CS package template (SPICED summary) |
| CRM Quick Reference | All stages | Stage names, exit criteria fields, conversion targets |
Each section must reference the Exit Criteria fields reps populate in CRM. Managers and reps use the same document for execution and inspection.
Output Format
Sales enablement package:
# Sales Enablement Package: [Product/Feature]
## Assets Produced
- [ ] Pitch Deck (10 slides, 3 persona variants)
- [ ] One-Pagers (CTO, VP Sales, Champion)
- [ ] Battlecards (Competitor A, B, C)
- [ ] Objection Handling Doc (6 categories, 30+ objections)
- [ ] Demo Script (3 variants: first demo, deep-dive, exec overview)
- [ ] ROI Calculator
- [ ] Case Studies (2-3, sales format)
- [ ] Sales Playbook (central reference)
## Access
- Deck: [link]
- Playbook: [link]
- All assets: [folder]
Quality Check
- Playbook sections map to pipeline stages from
pipeline-management - SPICED questions organized by stage with CRM field names
- Every asset references the core positioning and messaging framework
- Assets are persona-specific (not one-size-fits-all)
- Reps can find any asset in under 30 seconds
- Battlecards include talk tracks, not just feature comparisons
- Demo script tested with a live audience
- All metrics and claims verified and sourceable
Common Pitfalls
-
One deck for everyone. A CTO and a VP Sales care about different things. If your deck works for both, it works for neither.
-
Feature dumps as decks. Slides that list features without connecting them to customer problems are skipped. Every slide answers "so what?"
-
No talk tracks in battlecards. A feature comparison table without language the rep can actually say in a call isn't a battlecard — it's a reference doc.
-
Assets nobody can find. PDFs buried in a Drive folder. Build a single access point (Notion, SharePoint, dedicated Slack channel).
-
Static assets. Enablement degrades monthly. Schedule quarterly reviews to update metrics, add new competitors, and retire stale decks.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— Named frameworks and reference tablestemplates/output-template.md— Deliverable shell for agent outputscripts/check-output.py— Lightweight deliverable validatorreferences/force-management-playbook.md— Repo root: Command of the Message, alignment cadence
Related Skills
- pipeline-management: Sales process and stage definitions (prerequisite)
- pitch-deck-builder: Detailed slide-by-slide deck construction
- battlecard-builder: Competitive battlecard creation
- demo-scripts: Demo script writing
- objection-handling: Objection taxonomy and response frameworks
- positioning-messaging: Foundation positioning these assets draw from