Sending platforms
Skill LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/outbound/sending-platforms
Compares, selects, and configures cold email sending platforms: Smartlead, Instantly, Salesforge, Apollo, and others. Use when the user asks which sending platform to use, needs to compare features or pricing, wants to migrate between platforms, or needs platform-specific setup guidance. Activates on phrases like "which email platform," "Smartlead vs Instantly," "best sending tool," "Salesforge setup," "Apollo sequences," or "migrate sending platform."From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill sending-platformsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
18.0 KB, ~3.9k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Sending Platforms
Overview
Choosing a cold email sending platform is not a feature-comparison exercise. It is a business decision that determines your deliverability ceiling, your workflow efficiency, and your ability to scale. The wrong platform choice costs you thousands of emails that never reach the inbox — and you won't know it until open rates collapse.
This skill compares the four major cold email sending platforms — Smartlead, Instantly, Salesforge, and Apollo — across the dimensions that matter: pricing, warmup quality, API access, CRM integration, sequence capabilities, analytics, and deliverability infrastructure. It also covers setup guidance for each platform and a decision matrix for different use cases (solo founder, SDR team, enterprise outbound).
The non-obvious rule: the platform with the most features is not the best platform. The best platform is the one with the most reliable inbox placement for YOUR specific sending profile (volume, industry, email provider mix). A platform with excellent Gmail deliverability but poor Outlook deliverability is the wrong choice if 60% of your targets use Outlook.
When to Use
- User asks "which email sending platform should I use" or "Smartlead vs Instantly" → activate this skill
- User says "compare sending platforms" or "evaluate email tools" → activate this skill
- User wants to "migrate from Apollo to Smartlead" or "switch sending platforms" → activate this skill
- User asks "how to set up [platform]" or "configure [platform] for cold email" → activate this skill
- User mentions platform-specific features: "unibox," "email warmup," "spintax," "smart lead rotation" → activate this skill
- User asks about "API integration" or "CRM sync" for sending platforms → activate this skill
Do NOT use for:
- Buying domains and mailboxes → use
domain-infrastructure - Configuring SPF/DKIM/DMARC → use
email-deliverability - Writing email copy → use
cold-email-copywriting - Designing sequences → use
cold-email-strategy - Handling replies → use
reply-handling
Authoritative Foundations
This skill draws from the following:
-
Smartlead Documentation — Official documentation on sequence configuration, category-based reply handling, master inbox (Unibox), API, and deliverability features. Smartlead's category-based reply classification and auto-responder system is the most sophisticated in the market.
-
Instantly Documentation — Official docs on campaign management, warmup pool, Deliverability Score, and analytics. Instantly has the largest warmup pool and the most mature warmup infrastructure.
-
Salesforge Documentation — Official docs on AI-powered personalization, mailbox management, and deliverability. Salesforge's AI copywriting and personalization features are unique in the market.
-
Apollo.io Documentation — Official docs on sequences, data enrichment, and CRM integration. Apollo is unique in combining a B2B database with a sending platform, making it a one-stop shop for prospecting + outreach.
-
ColdIQ — Platform Reviews and Benchmarks — Independent testing data comparing deliverability, features, and user experience across platforms. ColdIQ's head-to-head tests inform the deliverability comparison section.
Prerequisites
- Run
domain-infrastructurefirst if you don't yet have domains and mailboxes — the platform selection depends on your infrastructure - Run
cold-email-strategyfirst if you need to define your sequence architecture before selecting a platform - Required user inputs: daily sending volume, number of mailboxes, budget, CRM in use, technical capability of the team, whether SDRs will use the platform directly
- Reference files:
references/deliverability-primer.mdfor sending limits that affect platform choice
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Intake
Gather the following from the user. Ask all questions at once:
- Daily sending volume: How many emails per day total? Per mailbox?
- Number of mailboxes: How many sending mailboxes are currently set up or planned?
- Monthly budget per seat: What's the acceptable cost per user/SDR?
- CRM: Which CRM do you use (Salesforce, HubSpot, Attio, Pipedrive, none)?
- SDR team structure: How many SDRs? Will they use the sending platform directly or will sequences be managed centrally?
- Technical capability: Is there someone who can handle API integrations and DNS configuration, or do you need an all-in-one, low-config solution?
- AI needs: Do you need AI-powered copywriting, personalization, or reply handling? Or will a human write everything?
- Data needs: Do you need a built-in prospect database (like Apollo) or do you bring your own lists?
- Current platform: If migrating, what platform are you on now? What's not working?
- Target inboxes: Roughly what percentage of your targets use Gmail vs Outlook vs other? This affects deliverability priorities.
- Compliance requirements: GDPR, SOC 2, any data processing requirements?
Phase 2: Research
Before making a recommendation, verify current state:
-
Check current pricing: Platform pricing changes frequently. Verify current pricing on each platform's website before making a recommendation. Smartlead, Instantly, and Salesforge typically offer monthly and annual plans. Apollo has a free tier with limits.
-
Check integration status: Verify that the user's CRM is still supported by the candidate platforms. CRM integrations change as platforms add or deprecate connectors.
-
Check deliverability benchmarks: Review recent (within 3 months) independent deliverability tests comparing the platforms. ColdIQ and other testing labs publish periodic head-to-head comparisons.
-
Audit current platform (if migrating): If the user is on a platform and wants to switch, audit what's broken:
- Deliverability issues? (may not be the platform's fault)
- Missing features?
- Too expensive?
- Poor UX?
- Lack of support? The answer determines whether migration is worth the switching cost.
Phase 3: Execution
Step 1: Platform Comparison
Use references/platform-comparison.md for the full platform comparison matrix. In the main output, summarize only the top 2-3 candidate platforms and the decision logic.
Step 2: Decision Matrix
Apply the decision matrix based on user's specific needs:
| Scenario | Recommended Platform | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Solo founder, <100 emails/day, budget-conscious | Apollo (free tier) | Free, includes prospecting database |
| Solo founder, 100-300 emails/day, deliverability priority | Instantly | Best warmup, good deliverability for small setups |
| 2-5 SDR team, reply automation priority | Smartlead | Best reply categorization and automation |
| 2-5 SDR team, AI personalization priority | Salesforge | Unique AI copywriting and personalization features |
| Agency managing multiple clients | Instantly | Best workspace management and client separation |
| Enterprise, 10+ mailboxes, API-driven | Smartlead | Best API, webhooks, customization |
| International multi-language outreach | Salesforge | 30+ language AI copywriting |
| All-in-one (DB + outreach), fewer tools | Apollo | Built-in B2B database |
| Maximum deliverability above all else | Instantly + Smartlead warmup | Largest warmup pool |
| LinkedIn-heavy multi-channel | Smartlead | Best multi-channel sequence orchestration |
| Transitioning from basic tool, want to upgrade | Smartlead or Instantly | Both are step-ups from Mailshake/Woodpecker |
Step 3: Platform-Specific Setup Guidance
Smartlead setup checklist:
- Connect mailboxes via SMTP/IMAP or OAuth
- Configure custom tracking domains for each sending domain
- Set up SPF/DKIM/DMARC as documented in
email-deliverability - Start warmup (2-4 week program)
- Create client/project workspace
- Import prospects (CSV or API)
- Build sequence with conditional logic
- Configure reply categories and auto-actions
- Set up CRM integration for bi-directional sync
- Configure webhooks for real-time event handling
- Set up Unibox for unified reply management
- Test sequence with internal addresses first
- Go live with low volume, scale up gradually
Instantly setup checklist:
- Connect mailboxes (direct integration or SMTP)
- Configure custom tracking domains
- Set up SPF/DKIM/DMARC
- Activate warmup (Instantly's warmup pool)
- Monitor Deliverability Score daily during warmup
- Create campaign with email accounts assigned
- Import leads (CSV or API)
- Build sequence (simpler than Smartlead — linear sequences)
- Set up reply detection and labeling
- Connect CRM for contact/activity sync
- Configure Unibox for reply management
- Test internally, go live with gradual scaling
Salesforge setup checklist:
- Connect mailboxes
- Configure custom tracking domains
- Set up SPF/DKIM/DMARC
- Enable AI warmup
- Import leads or use built-in database
- Configure AI personalization settings (language, tone, variables)
- Build sequence with AI-generated or manual copy
- Set up reply handling
- Connect CRM for sync
- Test AI-generated copy with internal addresses
- Go live gradually
Apollo setup checklist:
- Create Apollo account and connect CRM
- Set up email integration (Google Workspace or M365 OAuth)
- Configure sending schedule and limits
- Set up email tracking and open/click detection
- Build prospect lists using Apollo's database filters
- Create sequence with templates
- Configure rules (auto-advance on reply, pause on bounce)
- Set up analytics dashboard
- If using Apollo's dialer: configure phone integration
- Test sequence internally
- Go live
Step 4: Migration Plan (if applicable)
If migrating between platforms:
- Export data from old platform: Export all active sequences, templates, prospect lists, reply data, and analytics.
- Audit active prospects: Identify prospects currently mid-sequence. These are the most sensitive — a botched migration breaks their sequence experience.
- Map sequences: Recreate the sequence architecture in the new platform before migrating prospects.
- Transfer prospects: Import prospect lists, noting any that are
mid-sequence. For mid-sequence prospects, either:
- Complete the sequence on the old platform, only migrate new prospects (safest)
- Restart sequences on the new platform with a note acknowledging the transition
- Resume at the equivalent touch number (risky — the platforms' sequence models may not align perfectly)
- Transfer mailboxes: Connect the same mailboxes to the new platform. Do NOT create new mailboxes for the migration — the reputation of existing mailboxes is an asset.
- Transfer tracking domains: Re-point tracking CNAME records to the new platform's tracking endpoint.
- Test thoroughly: Send test sequences to internal addresses through the new platform before migrating live prospects.
- Run parallel (if possible): Keep the old platform running for mid-sequence prospects while starting new prospects on the new platform.
- Decommission old platform: Only after all mid-sequence prospects have completed or been paused.
Phase 4: Delivery
Deliver a platform recommendation with setup plan:
- Recommendation: Which platform, which plan, why.
- Comparison summary: Key differentiators for the user's specific needs.
- Setup checklist: Platform-specific step-by-step setup guide.
- Integration plan: CRM connection, API/webhook configuration, data flow.
- Migration plan (if applicable): Step-by-step migration from current platform.
- Cost projection: Monthly and annual cost at the user's scale.
- Risk factors: What could go wrong with this platform choice and how to mitigate.
Output Format
# Sending Platform Recommendation for [Company]
## Current State
[Volume, mailboxes, CRM, team, budget, constraints]
## Recommendation: [Platform] — [Plan]
**Why this platform:** [3-5 key reasons specific to this user]
## Comparison Summary
| Dimension | Smartlead | Instantly | Salesforge | Apollo | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|------------|--------|--------|
| Deliverability | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [platform] |
| Warmup | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [platform] |
| Reply handling | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [platform] |
| API/Integrations | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [platform] |
| CRM integration | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [platform] |
| AI features | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [platform] |
| Multi-channel | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [platform] |
| Ease of use | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [rating] | [platform] |
| Cost at your scale | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | [platform] |
| Best fit for you | [why] | [why] | [why] | [why] | [platform] |
## Setup Checklist
- [ ] Step 1
- [ ] Step 2
[Full checklist from Step 3 above]
## Integration Plan
[CRM connection, API/webhook configuration, data flow diagram]
## Migration Plan (if applicable)
[Step-by-step migration with risk mitigation]
## Cost Projection
| Item | Monthly | Annual |
|------|---------|--------|
| Platform subscription | $[X] | $[X] |
| Additional mailboxes (if platform charges per mailbox) | $[X] | $[X] |
| Total | $[X]/mo | $[X]/yr |
## Risk Factors and Mitigations
1. **Risk:** [description]
**Mitigation:** [action]
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
- Have you verified current pricing on each platform's website?
- Is the recommendation justified for the user's specific volume, team size, CRM, and budget — not a generic "best platform" answer?
- Have you addressed ALL four major platforms in the comparison?
- Does the setup checklist include DNS configuration, mailbox connection, tracking domain setup, warmup, and testing?
- Is the migration plan (if applicable) safe for mid-sequence prospects?
- Are cost projections complete and based on verified current pricing?
- Are platform weaknesses honestly stated, not glossed over?
- Does the risk section address the specific downside of the recommended platform?
- Is the decision matrix applied to the user's specific scenario?
Common Pitfalls
-
Choosing based on features, not deliverability. A platform with AI copywriting and conditional branching means nothing if the emails land in spam. Deliverability is the first filter, not the last.
-
Underestimating switching costs. Migrating between platforms mid-campaign is painful. Data export/import, DNS reconfiguration, sequence recreation, and SDR retraining all take time. Plan migrations during natural pauses in outbound activity.
-
Choosing Apollo for the database, not the sending. Apollo's B2B database is valuable, but using it for sending ties your deliverability to Apollo's shared infrastructure. Many teams use Apollo for prospecting and a dedicated sending platform (Smartlead/Instantly) for outreach — best of both worlds but double the cost.
-
Ignoring CRM integration depth. "HubSpot integration" means different things on different platforms. Some do one-way push (sequence → CRM), others do bi-directional sync (CRM → sequence updates). If your workflow depends on CRM-driven sequence management, verify the integration depth before committing.
-
Scaling linearly with per-sender pricing. Smartlead and Instantly charge per sender (mailbox). At 5 mailboxes, the difference between $33/sender and $37/sender is $20/month. At 50 mailboxes, it's $200/month and growing. Model the cost at your target scale, not your current scale.
-
Not testing deliverability before migrating. Before committing to a new platform, set up a test domain and mailbox, run it through warmup, and send test campaigns. Measure inbox placement across Google, Microsoft, Yahoo. Platform claims about deliverability may not match reality for your specific sending profile.
-
Choosing Salesforge for AI copy without human review. AI-generated cold email copy varies widely in quality. For high-value personas (C-suite, enterprise), always have a human review and tune AI-generated copy. The AI is a starting point, not a final draft.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— Framework index and authority routingtemplates/output-template.md— Deliverable shell for agent outputscripts/check-output.py— Lightweight deliverable validatorreferences/deliverability-primer.md— Deliverability fundamentalsreferences/platform-comparison.md— Sending platform evaluation matrix
Related Skills
email-deliverability— adjacent workflow to use before or after this skilldomain-infrastructure— adjacent workflow to use before or after this skillcold-email-strategy— adjacent workflow to use before or after this skillsequencing-logic— adjacent workflow to use before or after this skill
What ships with it: 5 files
11.5 KB alongside SKILL.md, 1 of them executable
references/
- deliverability-primer.md2.4 KB
- framework-notes.md799 B
- platform-comparison.md6.3 KB
scripts/
- check-output.pyruns863 B
templates/
- output-template.md1.2 KB