Executive compensation
Skill LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/management-leadership/executive-compensation
205 production GTM agent skills for Claude Code — sales, outbound, prospecting, RevOps, ABM, PLG, CS, automation. Framework-cited playbooks with artifacts + QA scripts.
npx -y skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill executive-compensationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Canonical GTM compensation strategy — philosophy, role-by-role plans, stage- appropriate OTE, accelerators, SPIFs, and executive gates. VP/CRO offer clauses, variable gates, equity, severance, clawback, and Pavilion-style revenue-quality comp. Grounded in Sam Jacobs (Pavilion), Mark Roberge, McMahon, Bridge Group, and CRO Council benchmarks. Use when designing comp plans, OTE/quota, annual comp review, VP/CRO offers, or board comp approval. Triggers on: "GTM comp strategy", "comp plan design", "OTE calculator", "quota design", "executive comp", "CRO compensation", "VP Sales offer", "accelerators", "SPIF vs plan change", "Pavilion comp", "Sam Jacobs comp", "revenue leader compensation".
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
10.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Executive Compensation
Overview
Canonical home for GTM compensation strategy (IC through CRO). Comp is a behavior design system, not a headline OTE. CRO packages that pay only on bookings create mercenary quarter-end deals, logo churn, and sandbagged forecasts. Pavilion's CRO Council — led by Sam Jacobs — gates variable comp on revenue quality: net new ARR, NRR, and efficiency (Rule of 40 / EBITDA), not bookings alone.
Master playbook: references/gtm-compensation-strategy.md (Pattern 35).
Role × stage matrix: references/comp-by-role-stage.md.
IC bands + templates: gtm-role-descriptions → comp-benchmarks.md.
Founder budget / negotiation: founder-comp-playbook.
Approval conversations: gtm-leadership. Legal: employment-compliance.
HR GTM ramp handoff: hr-gtm-playbook.md (Pattern 28).
Reconcile thresholds: references/benchmark-reconciliation.md.
Not legal or tax advice. Every clause requires qualified counsel; state law varies on non-compete, commission timing, and parachute taxes.
When to Use
- "Design GTM comp plan" / "OTE and quota design"
- "Annual comp review for sales team"
- "Structure CRO compensation"
- "VP Sales offer letter clauses"
- "Executive severance for sales leader"
- "Equity refresh for CRO"
- "Variable gates for VP Sales"
- "Pavilion-style exec comp"
- "Board approval package for revenue leader"
IC plan templates live in gtm-role-descriptions; strategy and worksheets live here.
Step-by-Step Process (Full GTM Comp)
Phase 0: Load Master Playbook
references/gtm-compensation-strategy.md— philosophy, role strategies, stage gatesreferences/comp-by-role-stage.md— matrix by ARR bandskills/founder-led/gtm-role-descriptions/references/comp-benchmarks.md(viagtm-role-descriptions) — H1 2026 bandstemplates/comp-plan-design-worksheet.md— plan designtemplates/ote-calculator-template.md— quota math + scenarios
Founders: run founder-comp-playbook payroll % ARR check before publishing bands.
Authoritative Foundations
- Sam Jacobs (Pavilion). Founded Pavilion (Revenue Collective); hosts CRO School and publishes revenue-leader comp norms. Emphasis: peer benchmarks, efficient growth, and multi-metric executive gates — not hero bookings.
- Pavilion CRO Council. Private comp data for CROs at scale; use as directional benchmark with Bridge Group public surveys.
- Bridge Group. Leadership OTE bands, quota:OTE at org level, ramp expectations.
- Jason Lemkin. VP Sales before $2M ARR: ~70% failure; comp must include system-building milestones, not only ARR.
- Mark Roberge. Tie executive variable to measurable machine outcomes: hiring, training, process adoption — not vanity pipeline.
- Frank Slootman (Snowflake). Sales exec comp aligned to consumption
when revenue is usage-based — entire exec team on same metric set; eliminate
siloed MBOs that block cross-functional alignment. See
gtm-leadership/references/cro-enterprise-strategy.md. - John McMahon. CRO bonus should reflect forecast certification quality and rep productivity curves — not lone-wolf hero quarters. Board expects predictable commits backed by MEDDICC.
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Role Band & Mix
| Role | ARR Stage | OTE Band | Base / Variable |
|---|---|---|---|
| VP Sales | $3–15M | $220–350K | 60/40 or 50/50 |
| CRO (growth) | $15–50M | $400–600K | 65/35 |
| CRO (scale) | $50M+ | $500–800K+ | 60/40 |
| VP RevOps | $10M+ | $180–280K | 70/30 (mostly salary) |
Load references/executive-comp-benchmarks.md for Pavilion/Bridge alignment.
Phase 2: Variable Gates (CRO / VP)
Pavilion-quality gate model:
| Metric | Weight | Minimum floor | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net new ARR vs plan | 40–50% | 80% of target | Growth |
| Net revenue retention | 25–30% | 105–110% | Quality |
| Efficiency (Rule of 40 or EBITDA) | 20–25% | Board-defined floor | No junk revenue |
| Team milestones (VP) | 10–20% | Hiring/ramp KPIs | System, not heroics |
Partial payout: Document matrix — e.g. 80% ARR + 110% NRR = 85% variable max.
Phase 3: Clause Library
Load references/executive-clause-library.md — full clause set:
- At-will employment and cause definition
- Variable calculation, timing, and clawback (90-day logo churn)
- Equity: grant size, vest, cliff, refresh schedule
- Change of control: single vs double-trigger acceleration
- Severance: without cause (3–6 mo base + pro-rata bonus)
- Non-solicit / non-compete (jurisdiction-specific)
- Recoupment and D&O indemnity
- 280G parachute gross-up policy (if applicable)
- Signing bonus and relocation
- Garden leave and cooperation post-termination
- Board reporting and forecast certification
- Commission plan incorporation by reference
Template package: templates/executive-offer-package.md
Phase 4: Equity
| Element | VP Sales | CRO |
|---|---|---|
| Initial grant | 0.25–1.0% FD | 0.5–2.0% FD |
| Vest | 4yr, 1yr cliff | 4yr, 1yr cliff |
| Refresh | Year 2–3 performance | Annual top-up band |
| Exercise window | 90 days post-termination (negotiate) | Same |
Coordinate with equity-management and 409A.
Phase 5: Board Approval Packet
Deliverables for board or comp committee:
- OTE and gate summary
- Scenario payout table (50% / 80% / 100% / 120% plan)
- Equity grant summary cap table impact
- Severance and change-of-control exposure
- Comparison to Bridge / Pavilion band (directional)
- Recruiting context (internal vs external, urgency)
Phase 6: Negotiation Patterns
| Candidate ask | Response framework |
|---|---|
| Higher base | Trade variable weight or milestone gates |
| Uncapped variable | Cap accelerators; add NRR gate |
| Larger equity | Refresh commitment vs upfront grant |
| Guaranteed first-year payout | Signing bonus separate from variable |
| Shorter cliff | Higher grant or lower base |
Output Format
- Executive offer package (
templates/executive-offer-package.md) - Clause appendix with marked optional/required clauses
- Board comp memo (1–2 pages)
- Variable payout scenario table
Quality Check
- Variable gated on ≥2 metrics including revenue quality (NRR or efficiency)
- Cause and severance definitions explicit
- Clawback on churn/downgrade documented
- Equity vest, cliff, refresh stated
- Change-of-control triggers defined
- Legal review flag on non-compete and commission law
- VP milestone gates if pre-$5M ARR (Lemkin system-building)
Common Pitfalls
- Bookings-only CRO bonus. Pays for bad-fit ARR. Fix: NRR + efficiency gates.
- No clawback. Logo churn 60 days post-close. Fix: 90-day ARR clawback.
- Hero VP comp. Single ARR number, no hiring/ramp gates. Fix: 20% system KPIs.
- Verbal equity. Fix: written grant with board approval date.
- National non-compete template. Unenforceable in many states. Fix: counsel.
Consumption-Model CRO Gates (Snowflake pattern)
When revenue recognizes on usage (Snowflake, Databricks DBU, similar):
| Metric | Weight | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption / usage vs plan | 30–40% | Primary revenue lever |
| Net new ARR + NRR | 25–35% | Expansion quality |
| Deployment / activation rate | 15–20% | Prevents oversell |
| S&M efficiency / Rule of 40 | 15–20% | Slootman + Meritech board lens |
Do not pay CRO on bookings alone when GAAP revenue trails contracts.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.mdtemplates/output-template.mdscripts/check-output.pyreferences/gtm-compensation-strategy.md— canonical master playbook (Pattern 35)references/comp-by-role-stage.md— role × ARR stage matrixtemplates/comp-plan-design-worksheet.md— plan design worksheettemplates/ote-calculator-template.md— OTE, quota, accelerator scenarios../gtm-leadership/references/cro-enterprise-strategy.md— Consumption comp alignment, McMahon board gates (Pattern 31)references/executive-clause-library.md— full clause text blocksreferences/executive-comp-benchmarks.md— Pavilion/Bridge bandsreferences/pavilion-cro-comp.md— Sam Jacobs / CRO Council patternstemplates/executive-offer-package.md— offer + comp + equity summarytemplates/board-comp-memo.md— board approval format Cross-skill: CRO variable gates align withsaas-outcomes/references/exit-metrics-matrix.md(NRR, Rule of 40, burn multiple)
Related Skills
gtm-role-descriptions— IC comp bands + plan templatesfounder-comp-playbook— founder budget, negotiation, offer walkthroughsales-team-building— hire sequence, POD economics, comp modelsrevenue-team-onboarding— ramp tables aligned to comp plansgtm-leadership— comp approval conversationsequity-management— cap table, 409Aemployment-compliance— offer legalityboard-meeting-prep— comp committee presentationfinancial-modeling— scenario modeling for gates