agentsclimarketplace

Hiring agencies

Skill LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/founder-led/hiring-agencies

205 production GTM agent skills for Claude Code — sales, outbound, prospecting, RevOps, ABM, PLG, CS, automation. Framework-cited playbooks with artifacts + QA scripts.

Install
npx -y skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill hiring-agencies

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Evaluate, hire, and manage GTM agencies — outbound, RevOps/Clay, demand gen, design, and dev shops. Agency vs in-house decision framework, pilot structure, scorecards, kill switches, and handoff to internal teams. Use when outsourcing GTM execution, evaluating an outbound agency, or deciding agency vs first hire. Triggers on: "hire agency", "outbound agency", "GTM agency", "Clay agency", "RevOps agency", "agency vs in-house", "outsource GTM", "marketing agency", "dev shop", "manage agency".

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

9.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Hiring Agencies

Overview

Agencies buy speed, not strategy. The right agency proves a channel or builds a workflow faster than hiring. The wrong agency burns 90 days and your domain reputation with nothing to show for it.

You cannot outsource your ICP, positioning, or sales process — those are yours. Agencies execute within a process you define (pipeline-management, gtm-context). This skill covers agency vs in-house decisions, GTM agency types, evaluation, pilot structure, weekly management, and when to bring the function in-house (sales-team-building).

When to Use

  • "Should I hire an outbound agency?"
  • "Agency vs building an in-house team"
  • "Find a Clay / RevOps agency"
  • "Evaluate a marketing or demand gen agency"
  • "How to manage an agency engagement"
  • "Structure an agency pilot"
  • "When to fire an agency"

Do not use for individual freelancers — use hiring-contractors. Do not use for partner/reseller programs — use partner-programs.

Authoritative Foundations

  • Winning by Design — GTM Index (Operating Model). Score your Operating Model 1–10 before outsourcing. Below 6: you lack the process for an agency to execute against. Fix pipeline-management first — agencies amplify process, they do not create it.
  • Jason Lemkin (SaaStr). Agencies work for channel testing and specialized execution. Core sales motion and customer relationships stay in-house. Never outsource strategy; outsource labor on a defined playbook.
  • Paul Graham — Do Things That Do Not Scale. Founders must do unscalable work first (sell, define ICP, write messaging). Agencies scale what you've already proven — not discovery of what works.

Step-by-Step Process

Phase 1: Agency vs In-House Decision

FactorAgencyIn-House
Time to start1–4 weeks3–6 months hire + ramp
Monthly cost$3–15K (GTM ops), $5–20K (outbound)$8–15K/employee fully loaded
CommitmentMonth-to-month or 90-day pilotEmployment
Process controlYou define playbook; they executeYou own process end-to-end
Best forChannel test, overflow, specialized toolingCore revenue function

Choose agency when: Operating Model ≥6, playbook documented, you need capacity or a channel test, specialized skill (Clay, paid media) you won't hire for yet.

Choose in-house when: Core sales motion, ongoing customer relationships, competitive differentiation, or agency pilot proved the channel and ROI justifies a hire (sales-team-building).

Phase 2: GTM Agency Types

Agency TypeWhat They DoMonthly CostProve By Day 90
Outbound / SDRCold email, LinkedIn, calling, meeting booking$3–15K + toolsQualified meetings at target CPA
RevOps / ClayEnrichment workflows, CRM hygiene, automation$3–8KPipeline data quality, workflow uptime
Demand gen / GrowthContent, SEO, paid ads, CRO$5–20KMQL→SQL conversion, CAC by channel
Sales consultingPlaybook design, process audit, trainingProject: $10–30KDocumented process + rep certification
Design studioBrand, UI/UX, web$5–15K/projectOn-brand assets, conversion lift
Dev shopProduct features, integrations$10–50KShipped, reviewed, owned code

Match agency type to gap. Do not hire an outbound agency to fix a broken ICP.

Phase 3: Evaluation Scorecard

Score each candidate 1–5 on six dimensions:

DimensionWhat to VerifyRed Flag
Relevant case studiesYour industry, ACV, ICP — not generic logos"We've worked with 200 SaaS companies"
Process transparencyWeekly deliverables, tools, data sources named"Proprietary process"
Reference calls2–3 clients: actual results, what failedNo references or only cherry-picked
Contract flexibility90-day pilot, 30-day out12-month lock-in
Data hygieneVerified contacts, suppression lists, opt-outPurchased/scraped lists
Your playbook fitWill execute YOUR stages and messagingInsists on their own messaging

Phase 4: Pilot Structure (30–90 Days)

Scope (specific, measurable):

  • Bad: "Generate pipeline"
  • Good: "Book 8 qualified meetings/month with VP+ at Series B fintech, $20K+ ACV"

Your inputs (non-negotiable):

  • ICP definition and exclusion list
  • Approved messaging and pipeline-management stage definitions
  • CRM access (they log activity in YOUR system)
  • Suppression list (customers, competitors, opted-out)
  • Weekly reporting template

Weekly agency scorecard:

MetricTargetActualNotes
Activities completed
Qualified meetings booked
Cost per qualified meeting
Data quality (% verified)
CRM hygiene (% logged)

Kill switch: End at day 90 if targets missed by >30%. No extensions without a written remediation plan.

Phase 5: Ongoing Management

  • You own: ICP, positioning, messaging, sales process, approval on copy
  • Agency owns: Execution, tooling, activity volume, reporting
  • Cadence: 30-min weekly review (scorecard + pipeline inspection)
  • Access: Agency works in your CRM and sequencer — not a black box spreadsheet
  • Graduation: If pilot succeeds, either scale agency budget or hire in-house using proven playbook (sales-team-building, hiring-by-role). Clay/RevOps agency → GTM Engineer FTE: gtm-role-descriptionsgtm-engineer-hiring.md

Phase 6: Agency → In-House Transition

When an agency proves a channel:

  1. Document their playbook (stages, templates, targeting rules)
  2. Hire for the proven role — not the agency's account manager
  3. Run 30-day overlap: agency + new hire parallel
  4. Cut agency scope as internal team ramps
  5. Keep agency for overflow or specialized work only

Output Format

Agency plan containing: agency vs in-house recommendation, agency type selection, shortlist scorecard, 90-day pilot scope with measurable targets, weekly scorecard template, kill switch criteria, and in-house transition plan.

Use templates/output-template.md for structure. Run scripts/check-output.py before delivery.

Quality Check

Before delivering, verify:

  • Operating Model readiness assessed (process exists before outsourcing)
  • Agency type matches the actual gap (not defaulting to outbound)
  • Pilot goals are measurable with numeric targets and deadlines
  • Suppression list and data verification requirements included
  • Weekly scorecard template provided
  • Kill switch defined at day 90
  • In-house transition path documented if pilot succeeds
  • Founder/strategy ownership explicit — agency executes, not decides

Common Pitfalls

  1. Agency before process. Without pipeline-management stages and SPICED fields, the agency invents its own motion. Fix: document process first.

  2. Outsourcing strategy. Agencies write messaging from scratch without your positioning. Fix: provide approved copy, ICP, and talk tracks.

  3. Black-box reporting. Activity counts without pipeline impact. Fix: score on qualified meetings and cost-per-meeting, logged in your CRM.

  4. Unverified data. Bad lists burn domain reputation. Fix: require verified emails and suppression checks before any send.

  5. No kill switch. Sunk-cost extensions for 6+ months. Fix: 90-day pilot with explicit stop criteria.

  6. Never bringing in-house. Perpetual agency dependency at 2–3x employee cost. Fix: graduate proven channels to hires.

Execution Artifacts

  • references/framework-notes.md — agency types, scorecard, WbD readiness gate
  • templates/output-template.md — agency evaluation and pilot plan
  • scripts/check-output.py — validates deliverable sections

Related Skills

  • hiring-contractors — Individual freelancers vs agency teams
  • sales-team-building — In-house alternative and graduation path
  • gtm-role-descriptions — GTM Engineer JD when graduating Clay agency work
  • hiring-by-role — GTM Engineer scorecard after agency pilot
  • pipeline-management — Process agencies execute against
  • cold-email-strategy — Outbound agency messaging standards
  • clay-automation — RevOps agency workflow requirements
  • tool-selection-stack — Tool budget when agency brings their own stack

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.