Advisor recruitment
Skill LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/founder-led/advisor-recruitment
205 production GTM agent skills for Claude Code — sales, outbound, prospecting, RevOps, ABM, PLG, CS, automation. Framework-cited playbooks with artifacts + QA scripts.
npx -y skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill advisor-recruitmentAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Strategic advisor recruitment for B2B SaaS founders. Use when building advisory board, recruiting individual advisors, structuring advisor compensation (equity grants), defining advisory scope, leveraging advisors for intros/references/customers, and managing ongoing advisor relationships.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
13.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Advisor Recruitment
Overview
Most startup advisors are ornamental — they take 0.25% equity, attend zero meetings, and provide zero value. The mistake: recruiting advisors for logos instead of leverage. Great advisors unlock customers, candidates, investors, and strategic decisions. This skill covers identifying who you need, structuring the relationship, compensating fairly, and extracting maximum value.
Authoritative Foundations
- Scott Kupor (Andreessen Horowitz) — Secrets of Sand Hill Road (advisory equity) — Secrets of Sand Hill Road (advisory equity)
- Elad Gil — High Growth Handbook (leveraging advisors) — High Growth Handbook (leveraging advisors)
- First Round Review — High-Impact Advisory Relationships — High-Impact Advisory Relationships
- Jason Lemkin (SaaStr) — When advisors add value vs are dead weight — When advisors add value vs are dead weight
When to Use
Trigger phrases: "advisor recruitment", "advisory board", "advisor equity", "how to find advisors", "advisor agreement", "compensating advisors", "leveraging advisors", "advisor introductions", "should I give equity to advisor"
Who Makes a Great Advisor
4 advisor archetypes — you need at least 2:
-
The Customer Door-Opener: VP-level or above at your target accounts. Unlocks enterprise deals that would take 6 months of cold outreach. Value: $100K-500K+ in pipeline per year.
-
The Technical Authority: CTO/VP Eng at a respected company. Validates your tech approach, helps recruit engineers, joins customer calls for credibility. Value: recruiting leverage + technical credibility.
-
The GTM Sage: Former CRO/VP Sales who's scaled from $1M to $50M+ ARR. Coaches you and your sales team, pressure-tests GTM strategy, makes candidate intros. Value: prevents expensive GTM mistakes ($100K+ in avoided bad hires).
-
The Investor Connector: Well-networked founder or executive who knows every relevant VC partner personally. Warms introductions, preps you for meetings, vouches for your credibility. Value: 6-12 weeks faster fundraise.
Do NOT recruit:
- "Big name" advisors who are too busy to meet (they're logos, not leverage)
- Advisors who advise 10+ companies (you're a line item, not a priority)
- Friends/family who don't fit an archetype (awkward to fire)
- Anyone you can't have hard conversations with
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Identify Your Gaps
Before recruiting, answer:
- What's the #1 constraint on your growth right now?
- Who has solved this exact constraint at your stage before?
- What specific outcome would make an advisor relationship worth 0.25% equity?
Example gap → advisor mapping:
| Gap | Advisor Archetype | Success Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Can't get meetings with VP-level buyers | Customer Door-Opener | 5+ qualified intros/quarter |
| Pipeline conversion rate is below 20% | GTM Sage | Improve conversion to 25%+ in 2 quarters |
| Losing candidates to well-funded competitors | Technical Authority | 2+ key hires attributed to advisor |
| Fundraising in 6 months, no VC network | Investor Connector | 10+ warm partner intros during raise |
Phase 2: Source Candidates
Where to find advisors (in order of effectiveness):
- Your investors' networks — ask board members: "Who's the best [role] you know who'd be open to advising a company at our stage?"
- Your customers — your power users at target logos are future advisors
- Podcast hosts / newsletter authors in your space — they're already building audience and credibility, they know everyone
- Portfolio company executives — VPs at companies 2-3 stages ahead of you
- Your own LinkedIn network — 2nd-degree connections who fit archetypes
Outreach template (investor intro is better, but if cold):
Subject: Quick question — advisory interest?
Hi [name],
I've followed your work at [company] and specifically how you [specific
accomplishment you genuinely admire].
I'm the founder of [company] — we're at $X ARR helping [ICP] with [problem].
We're at the stage where your expertise in [specific domain] would be
high-impact.
Would you be open to a 20-minute call to see if an advisory relationship
makes sense? No pressure — I'd value the conversation either way.
Best,
[Name]
Phase 3: The Advisor Pitch Meeting
Structure (30 minutes):
- 5 min — Context: Company, traction, team, vision
- 5 min — The ask: Why them specifically ("You've scaled SDR teams from 0 to 50 at two companies — we're about to hire SDR #1")
- 10 min — Their questions: Let them probe. Good advisors ask hard questions.
- 10 min — Scope discussion: "Here's what I'd hope to get from the relationship. What would make this worthwhile for you?"
What you're evaluating in this meeting:
- Do they genuinely light up about your space? (Passion > politeness)
- Do they ask sharp questions? (Intellectual rigor)
- Do they offer unsolicited advice? (Good advisors can't help themselves — they start advising in the first meeting)
- Can you imagine having hard conversations with them? (Comfort with candor)
Phase 4: Structure the Agreement
The FAST Advisory Agreement (invented by Scott Kupor at a16z):
FAST = Founder Advisor Standard Template. It's the industry standard. Use it.
Standard advisor compensation:
| Advisor Level | Equity Grant | Vesting | Typical Commitment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Advisor | 0.15-0.25% | 2 years, no cliff | 1-2 hours/month |
| Strategic Advisor | 0.25-0.50% | 2 years, no cliff | 2-4 hours/month |
| Heavy-Lift Advisor | 0.50-1.00% | 2-4 years | 4-8 hours/month |
Key terms:
- Vesting: 2-year standard, monthly. No cliff (advisors should earn from day 1).
- Termination: Either party can terminate with 30 days notice. Vested shares retained, unvested cancelled.
- Scope: Define 3-5 specific deliverables or success metrics
- Meeting cadence: Monthly 1:1 (30 min) + ad hoc calls as needed
- Confidentiality: Standard NDA language
- IP Assignment: Standard — any IP created during advisory is company property
Sample scope language:
Advisor agrees to:
1. Two 30-minute calls per month with CEO to review GTM strategy
2. Quarterly review of sales team structure and compensation
3. 5+ qualified candidate introductions per year
4. Join up to 4 enterprise prospect calls per year (as schedule permits)
5. Provide introductions to potential partners and customers as agreed
Phase 5: Extract Maximum Value
Advisor value extraction playbook:
Monthly cadence:
- Send pre-read 24 hours before monthly call: key metrics, top 3 challenges, 2-3 specific questions
- Call: 20 min on their advice, 10 min on asks (intros, references, candidates)
- Post-call: thank-you email with action items, next call scheduled
Quarterly strategic review:
- 60-minute deep dive on one strategic topic
- This is where the real value comes — not monthly check-ins
- Example topics: "Should we move upmarket?" "How do we compete against [competitor]?" "Our SDR team isn't hitting quota — diagnose?"
Asks — specific, time-bound, easy to say yes to:
- BAD: "Can you help us with recruiting?" → produces nothing
- GOOD: "We're hiring a Head of Engineering. Here's the JD. Do you know 2-3 people who'd be a fit? Happy to reach out or take an intro."
Advisor introductions protocol:
- You write the intro email draft (they just forward it)
- Include: who you are, why the intro, what you're asking for, time commitment
- Make it easy for them to say yes — pre-written email, clear ask, low time ask
Phase 6: Fire Advisors Who Don't Deliver
Advisor equity is expensive — 0.25% of a $100M company is $250K. Treat it that way.
When to fire an advisor:
- Missed 3+ consecutive monthly calls (they don't have time — or interest)
- Zero introductions in 6+ months
- Advice is generic ("focus on product-market fit") rather than specific
- You dread the calls (trust your gut)
How to fire an advisor:
Subject: Advisory relationship update
Hi [name],
I've really appreciated your time and advice over the past [X months].
As we've scaled, our advisory needs have shifted — I think it makes sense
to wind down our formal advisory relationship.
All your vested shares are yours to keep. I'd love to stay in touch, and
I'm grateful for your contributions to [company].
Thank you,
[Name]
Clean. Professional. Don't over-explain.
Output Format
ADVISOR RECRUITMENT PLAN
Priority Gaps:
1. [Gap] → [Archetype] → Success Metric: [measurable outcome]
2. ...
Target Advisor Slate (4-6 advisors):
| Name | Archetype | Why Them | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | [Identified / Contacted / Meeting Scheduled / Signed / Active] |
Compensation Budget:
- Total equity allocated to advisors: X% (typically 2-5% for seed stage)
- Individual grants: 0.15-1.0% based on level
Advisory Scope Per Member:
[Per-advisor scope document with deliverables and metrics]
Relationship Management:
- Monthly 1:1 cadence with each advisor
- Quarterly strategic deep dives (60 min, one topic)
- Specific ask tracking: [spreadsheet of intros, references, candidates requested]
Implementation Checklist
- Every advisor maps to a specific business gap (not a logo play)
- No "big name" advisors who advise 10+ companies (they won't deliver)
- FAST agreement used as template (industry standard)
- Scope includes 3-5 measurable deliverables
- Equity grants proportional to expected time commitment
- Monthly cadence established before agreement is signed
- Quarterly strategic deep dives scheduled
- Advisor performance reviewed annually (renew or release)
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
- Output matches the user's stated request
- Named frameworks or sources are reflected in the recommendation
- The deliverable is specific enough for an agent to execute
- Any assumptions, risks, or dependencies are explicit
- No unsupported claims, invented facts, or private/internal references are included
Common Pitfalls
-
Advisor logo collecting. 6 advisors who never show up are worse than 0 advisors who show up — they dilute equity and create fake confidence. Fix: Cap at 4-6 active advisors. Quality over quantity.
-
No scope definition. "Be available to help" produces nothing. "5 customer intros per quarter" produces pipeline. Fix: Define specific deliverables in the advisor agreement.
-
Over-equitying light advisors. 1% for "I'll take your call when you need me" is a bad trade. 0.25% for 2 hours/month with specific deliverables is fair. Fix: Use FAST template benchmarks.
-
No advisor management system. Advisors don't self-manage. If you don't send pre-reads, schedule calls, and track asks, they'll drift. Fix: Treat advisor management like a recurring 1-hour/week task.
-
Asking for too much. "Can you introduce me to every VP of Sales you know?" is overwhelming. "Can you think of 2-3 people for our Head of Engineering role?" is actionable. Fix: Specific, time-bound, easy-to-say-yes asks.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This skill provides general informational guidance based on publicly available frameworks and operator experience. It is NOT legal advice, accounting advice, tax advice, financial advice, insurance advice, or professional services advice.
Consult qualified professionals for your specific situation — attorneys for legal/equity matters, CPAs for tax and accounting, licensed brokers for insurance, and certified security assessors for compliance. This skill does not create a professional-client relationship. Use it as a starting point for research and preparation.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— Named frameworks and reference tablestemplates/output-template.md— Deliverable shell for agent outputscripts/check-output.py— Lightweight deliverable validator
Related Skills
first-hires-playbook— First 10 hires, compensation, interview designfundraising-strategy— Advisor intros are the best fundraising channelboard-meeting-prep— Board vs advisory board — different roles, both importantfounder-brand— Building the presence that attracts top advisors to you