Webinar strategy
Skill LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/demand-gen/webinar-strategy
205 production GTM agent skills for Claude Code — sales, outbound, prospecting, RevOps, ABM, PLG, CS, automation. Framework-cited playbooks with artifacts + QA scripts.
npx -y skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill webinar-strategyAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Plan and execute demand gen webinars — topic selection, speaker sourcing, promotion cadence, follow-up sequences. Triggers on: "webinar", "webinar strategy", "virtual event", "demand gen webinar", "webinar promotion".
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
7.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Webinar Strategy
Overview
Webinars remain one of the highest-converting demand gen channels in B2B when done with a "commercial teaching" angle — not product demos disguised as content. This skill covers topic selection, speaker sourcing, promotion architecture, and post-webinar pipeline conversion.
Authoritative Foundations
- TOPO Webinar Framework — Named methodology governing recommendations in this skill's process.
- CEB Challenger Commercial Teaching — Teach-tailor-take control — reframe buyer thinking with insight-led conversations.
- SiriusDecisions — Demand Waterfall — Demand Waterfall
When to Use
- "Plan a webinar"
- "Build webinar strategy"
- "Launch a webinar series"
- "Webinar demand gen"
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Topic Selection
Use the Challenger Sale "commercial teaching" framework:
- Teach something counterintuitive: "Why your pipeline forecast is lying to you"
- Frame the problem differently: "The 3 attribution mistakes costing you 40% of pipeline"
- Lead to your unique solution: Position your methodology, not your product
Valid topics pass three tests:
- Does it challenge a widely-held assumption in the ICP's world?
- Would a prospect forward this to their boss?
- Does it naturally lead to a conversation about the problem your product solves?
Phase 2: Speaker Sourcing
- Internal expert: Your best thinker, not your best presenter
- Customer speaker: The customer's story, in their words, with their results. This is 10x more credible than your case study.
- Industry analyst/partner: Third-party credibility and shared audience
- Never: Panel of 5 people with 6 minutes each — the worst format
Phase 3: Promotion Architecture (21-Day Build)
- Day 21: Registration page live, organic social tease
- Day 14: Email blast 1 to house list (segmented by webinar relevance)
- Day 10: Speaker social posts, LinkedIn event page
- Day 7: Email blast 2 (different angle, "what you'll learn")
- Day 5: LinkedIn ads to lookalike audience, partner cross-promotion
- Day 3: Email blast 3 ("last chance"), DM outreach to high-value targets
- Day 1: Reminder email with calendar link
Phase 4: Production Quality
- 45 minutes max (30 mins content + 15 mins Q&A)
- Slides: minimal text, one idea per slide, visual-heavy
- Live demo only if it's a product webinar (different play)
- Recorded backup for any live demo components
- Moderator separate from presenter (manages Q&A, tech issues)
Phase 5: Post-Webinar Pipeline
- Hour 0: Thank-you email with recording + slide deck
- Day 1: "Missed the Q&A?" email with written answers to the best questions
- Day 3: Attendee segmentation: hot (asked questions, stayed full time) vs warm
- Day 3-5: SDR call blitz on hot attendees while the content is fresh
- Day 7: Non-attendee follow-up: "Here's what you missed" with key insights
- Day 14: On-demand nurture: repurpose into blog, social clips, podcast
Output Format
Webinar plan with: topic validation, speaker brief, 21-day promotion calendar, production run-of-show, and post-webinar pipeline sequence.
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
- All required sections are complete
- Output matches the user's stated need
- Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations
- No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action
- Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual
Common Pitfalls
- Webinar as product demo. Prospects attend for insights, not a sales pitch. Fix: 80% educational content, 20% product mention. Lead with counterintuitive insights.
- One-and-done syndication. Publishing once and moving on. Fix: one pillar piece → 15+ derivatives across channels over 30 days.
- Measuring paid social on clicks. Clicks and CPL don't equal pipeline. Fix: track pipeline generated and cost per opportunity from each channel.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— Challenger teaching, TOPO promotion, Walker measurement, Pattern 26 routingtemplates/output-template.md— 21-day calendar, run-of-show, post-event pipeline sequencescripts/check-output.py— Lightweight deliverable validatorreferences/chris-walker-mental-models.md— Repo root: ungated education, 90-day program evalskills/foundation/using-gtm-skills/SKILL.md— Pattern 26: Demand Creation
Implementation Depth
Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation.
Diagnostic Questions
- What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led?
- Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed?
- What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none?
- What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow?
- What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure?
Framework Application
Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill:
- TOPO Webinar Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- CEB Challenger Commercial Teaching: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- SiriusDecisions — Demand Waterfall: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
Deliverable Standard
A strong output from this skill includes:
- A crisp diagnosis of the current situation
- A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list
- A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan
- A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators
- Risks and edge cases called out before execution
Adaptation Rules
- For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity.
- For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets.
- For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements.
Related Skills
- content-marketing, social-media-strategy, inbound-triage, pipeline-management, sales-enablement