Double diamond feature

Double Diamond Feature Development

Trigger Signals

Use this skill when the user asks for:

• a new feature
• a user-facing behavior change
• an API or workflow change
• an ambiguous product request
• architecture-significant implementation work
• a feature that may affect security, performance, data, accessibility, or cross-system behavior

Do not use as the primary workflow for bugs, regressions, outages, or flaky tests. Use bug-investigation instead.

Mode Selection

• Lite: small, low-risk, clear change. Keep output short. Maps to the brief output profile.
• Standard: default for meaningful feature work. Maps to the standard output profile.
• Deep: high-risk, ambiguous, cross-boundary, or architecture-significant work. Maps to the deep output profile.

State the selected mode and why. Prefer the lightest mode that still makes the work safe and reviewable.

Workflow

1. Discover

Gather evidence before editing files. Reuse Harness Forge runtime surfaces instead of rediscovering the repo: .hforge/runtime/repo/repo-map.json, .hforge/runtime/repo/recommendations.json, .hforge/generated/agent-command-catalog.json.

Classify every fact as:

• user-provided
• repository-derived
• runtime/tool-derived
• external research
• assumption

2. Define

Create the smallest correct problem frame:

• problem statement
• users/stakeholders
• non-goals
• constraints
• acceptance criteria
• risk level
• human checkpoint needed or not

3. Develop

For non-trivial work, compare at least two solution options:

Option	Summary	Pros	Cons	Risk	Validation

Select an option with rationale and trade-offs. For one viable option, justify why explicitly.

4. Deliver

Implement the selected option. Keep scope aligned with the defined problem.

After implementation, report:

• selected option
• files changed
• validation commands/results
• acceptance criteria mapping
• remaining risks
• rollback/mitigation
• follow-up work

Reframe Triggers

Stop and update the frame if:

• new evidence changes the problem
• the task is actually a bug (switch to bug-investigation)
• the selected option requires a larger blast radius than expected
• high-risk security/data/infrastructure behavior appears
• no credible validation path exists

Output Before Implementation

## Double Diamond Frame
Mode: Lite | Standard | Deep

### Discover
- User outcome:
- Evidence:
- Existing behavior:
- Constraints:
- Unknowns/assumptions:

### Define
- Problem:
- Non-goals:
- Acceptance criteria:
- Risk:

### Develop
| Option | Summary | Pros | Cons | Risk | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|

### Decision
- Selected option:
- Why:
- Trade-offs:

### Delivery plan
- Files likely to change:
- Validation:
- Rollback/mitigation:

Output After Implementation

## Delivery Report
- Selected option:
- Files changed:
- Validation:
- Acceptance mapping:
- Remaining risks:
- Rollback/mitigation:
- Follow-up:

High-Risk Pause

Pause for human confirmation before changes involving auth, secrets, payments, data deletion/migration, production infrastructure, or compliance-sensitive behavior.

Target Compatibility

This skill is plain-markdown and host-agnostic. Claude Code invokes it as /double-diamond-feature; Codex selects it via /skills or $double-diamond-feature. Do not rely on host-native hooks or interactive prompts — degrade to stating assumptions in non-interactive hosts.