Ship change
Reusable Codex skills and agent workflows
npx -y skills add LandonTomaine/LT-Agents --skill ship-changeAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Lightweight end-to-end coding workflow for taking a user request through analysis, a concise plan, implementation, validation, and handoff. Use when the user wants Codex to do a repo change from start to finish, especially when the work should be committed and pushed only after the user approves the final diff, commit message, and push target.
SKILL.md
2.8 KB, 524 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Ship Change
Primary lens: Implementation.
Goal
Move a repo request from intent to delivered local changes with minimal ceremony, while keeping approval boundaries clear before commit and push.
Workflow
-
Understand the request.
- Inspect the repo before assuming architecture, commands, or conventions.
- Check
git status --short --branchbefore editing. - Identify whether the worktree has unrelated user changes.
-
Plan briefly.
- State the intended files or areas to touch.
- Keep the plan proportional; use a short checklist for multi-step work.
- Ask only when a missing decision would make the implementation risky.
-
Implement.
- Follow existing repo patterns.
- Keep edits scoped to the request.
- Do not revert unrelated user changes.
- Update docs or indexes when the change affects user or agent workflow.
- Use or add a script only when it removes repeated deterministic work.
-
Validate.
- Run the repo's documented checks for the changed surface.
- If no checks are documented, run the lightest relevant inspection and say that no stronger validation exists.
- Report any skipped checks and why.
-
Review before shipping.
- Show the changed files and validation result.
- Inspect the diff yourself before asking for approval.
- Propose a concise commit message.
- Ask for explicit approval before committing or pushing unless the user already gave explicit approval for commit and push in the current request.
-
Commit and push after approval.
- Stage only the intended files.
- Commit with the approved or clearly proposed message.
- Push to the approved remote and branch.
- Report the commit SHA, branch, remote URL, and validation performed.
Git Safety
- Never use
git reset --hard,git checkout --, rebase, force-push, or history rewrite unless the user explicitly requests that exact operation. - Do not use
git add -Ain a mixed worktree unless every changed file is in scope. - If publishing requires auth, remote creation, or a new branch, explain the target before acting.
- If the push fails, stop and report the exact blocker; do not try destructive fixes.
Output
Keep the final answer short:
- what changed
- validation run
- commit SHA and push target, if shipped
- anything not done or still needing approval
Do Not
- Do not re-plan broad scope after implementation has started unless the request proves unsafe or ambiguous.
- Do not commit or push from vague approval.
What ships with it: 1 file
236 B alongside SKILL.md
agents/
- openai.yaml236 B