Hv spike

Print the banner below verbatim before any other action — skip if dispatched as a subagent. See references/banner-preamble.md.

════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  🧪  hv-spike  ·  throwaway feasibility experiment on a branch
  triggers: "spike X", "feasibility"  ·  pairs: hv-vision, hv-plan
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

hv-spike — Throwaway Feasibility Experiment

Code on the spike branch is reference, not product.

Two modes:

• Start mode — open a new spike with a question
• Finish mode — extract findings from work done on a spike branch into the spike file

Step 1 — Preflight & Mode

.hv/bin/hv-preflight

See docs/reference/preflight.md for exit-code handling.

Determine the mode silently:

• "spike SSE for live updates", "try X", "feasibility check on Y" → Start mode
• "spike done", "finish the SSE spike", "extract findings" → Finish mode
• Neither set of triggers matches, or both match → ask once

In Finish mode, list existing open spikes via .hv/bin/hv-spike-list and ask which one if not specified.

Initialize task list. Follow the canonical pattern in references/task-list-init.md — load TaskCreate(…) via ToolSearch select:TaskCreate,TaskUpdate if needed, then create one task per phase below.

Phases:

1. Question — Start: yes/no/conditional question sharpened (Step 2)
2. Branch — Start: spike/<name> created, scratch file seeded (Steps 2.5–4)
3. Investigate — Start: experiment runs to a clear answer (between Start and Finish)
4. Findings — Finish: spike file's findings section written from the branch state (Steps 5–6)
5. Decision — Finish: verdict (yes / no / conditional / inconclusive) recorded (Step 6)
6. Promote / cleanup — Finish: optional /hv-decide --from-spike, branch deleted (Steps 6.5–7)

Step 2 (Start mode) — Sharpen the Question

A spike answers a yes/no/conditional question. Push back if the question is vague:

• ❌ "Try Server-Sent Events" — too open
• ✅ "Can we use SSE for live updates over our existing nginx setup without proxy buffering issues?"

Name the spike with a short kebab-case identifier (sse-feasibility, auth-rotation, migration-cost). The name becomes the branch suffix and the spike file's stem.

Step 2.5 (Start mode) — Resolve Sub-Repo (umbrella mode only)

Skip this step entirely when umbrella mode is off (hv-umbrella-on returns no). See references/umbrella-mode.md for what umbrella mode means and how the registry works.

In umbrella mode, the spike branch must land in a specific sub-repo (the umbrella root often is not a git repo at all). Resolve <repo> via the 3-step fallback codified in KNOWLEDGE 2026-05-02:

1. If the user named a sub-repo in their input (e.g. "spike SSE feasibility in web") — use it.
2. Else, run .hv/bin/hv-resolve-repo from the current cwd; if it succeeds, default to the resolved name.
3. Else, ask via AskUserQuestion:
   • Header: "Repo"
   • Question: "Which sub-repo should spike/<name> live in?"
   • Options: one per registered sub-repo (read names from .hv/repos.json via load_repos()), single-select.

Carry <repo> into Step 4's helper invocation as --repo <repo>. The spike file still lands at the umbrella's .hv/spikes/<name>.md — only the git branch lives in the sub-repo, per the umbrella-vs-sub-repo .git/ distinction in references/umbrella-mode.md.

Step 3 (Start mode) — Confirm Before Branching

Before mutating git state, confirm with the user via AskUserQuestion:

• Header: "Spike"
• Question: "Create branch spike/<name> and switch to it now?" (umbrella mode: "Create branch spike/<name> in <repo> and switch to it now?")
• Options:
  1. "Yes, create and switch (Recommended)" — "Branches off current HEAD; you'll be on the spike branch immediately."
  2. "Create only, stay on this branch" — "Useful when you want to switch on your own time."
  3. "Cancel" — "Don't do anything."

Plain-text fallback: if the working tree is clean, default to "create and switch"; otherwise default to "create only" so dirty changes don't follow.

Step 4 (Start mode) — Create the Spike

# Single-repo:
BRANCH=$(.hv/bin/hv-spike-add <name> "<question>")
# Umbrella mode — spike lives in <repo>:
BRANCH=$(.hv/bin/hv-spike-add --repo <repo> <name> "<question>")

The helper:

• Creates branch spike/<name> off the current HEAD (in the sub-repo's git history when --repo is set)
• Writes .hv/spikes/<name>.md with frontmatter + question + section stubs
• Spike file .hv/spikes/<name>.md lives at the umbrella root regardless of --repo; only the git branch lands in the sub-repo. The frontmatter records repo: <name> so /hv-spike done and listings know which sub-repo to operate against.

If the user picked "create and switch" in Step 3, run git checkout "$BRANCH" — in umbrella mode, cd into <repo> first (or git -C <repo-path> checkout "$BRANCH").

Compact handoff:

Spike opened: spike/<name>           # umbrella: Spike opened: spike/<name> (in <repo>)
Question: <one line>
File: .hv/spikes/<name>.md

Hack freely on the branch. When done, return to main and run:
  /hv-spike done <name>

No further work in this skill — the user drives the experiment.

Step 5 (Finish mode) — Read the Spike Branch

Read repo: from .hv/spikes/<name>.md's frontmatter first (parallel-load with the spike-file content). When set, run the git log / git diff calls in the sub-repo (resolve via .hv/repos.json / load_repos()); when unset, run them in the cwd. Inspect git either by cd-ing into the sub-repo before the call or by passing git -C <sub-repo path>:

# Single-repo (no `repo:` in frontmatter) — run in cwd:
git log spike/<name> --oneline
git diff main...spike/<name> --stat

# Umbrella mode (`repo: <name>` in frontmatter) — run against the sub-repo:
git -C <sub-repo path> log spike/<name> --oneline
git -C <sub-repo path> diff main...spike/<name> --stat

Read .hv/spikes/<name>.md for the original question and any notes the user already wrote (the file always lives at the umbrella root, regardless of repo:).

Ask the user for the verbal summary if they haven't already given one — what they learned, viable or not, and why.

Fallback when the user stays silent. Don't pause indefinitely and don't fabricate findings from intuition. Pivot to question-only mode via AskUserQuestion:

• Pre-fill What was tried from the diff stat + commit log already gathered above — objective signals, no judgment required.
• Ask one structured question for the decision: header "Decision", single-select with options "viable", "not viable", "depends on X" (free-text X via "Other"), "inconclusive".
• If the user picks viable, follow up with one short free-text question for the recommended approach (one line); otherwise skip it and leave the field empty in Step 6.

If even the structured question returns nothing usable (dismissed or empty), write Decision: inconclusive and Findings: listing only the observed diff/commit signals — never invent findings the user didn't confirm.

Step 6 (Finish mode) — Write the Findings

Use the Edit tool on .hv/spikes/<name>.md to fill in:

• What was tried — concrete commands run, libraries pulled in, files touched (cite from the diff stat)
• Findings — 3–5 bullets, what you learned. Honest reporting — bad findings are as valuable as good
• Decision — viable / not viable / depends-on-X / inconclusive
• Recommended approach — only if viable. Describe the shape of the real implementation. Do not paste spike code

Then mark the spike done:

.hv/bin/hv-spike-finish <name>

The helper sets status: done and finished: <date> in the spike file. The branch is left as-is — historical reference, never merged.

Step 6.5 (Finish mode) — Promote Finding to Decision (nudge)

Read back the Decision field Step 6 just wrote. Skip this step entirely — no nudge, no question, no log — when the decision is inconclusive or empty. An inconclusive spike doesn't have enough evidence to be a hard boundary.

When the decision is viable, not viable, or depends-on-X, ask via AskUserQuestion:

• Header: "Decide"
• Question: "This spike concluded <verdict>. Promote the finding to a hard-boundary decision in DECISIONS.md?" (substitute the verbatim verdict)
• Options:
  1. "Yes, promote (Recommended)" — "Invoke /hv-decide --from-spike <name>. The spike's question + decision + recommended approach pre-fill the rule and why; you'll articulate the forbids/permits."
  2. "Skip — keep finding in spike file only" — "No decision is captured. The finding stays in .hv/spikes/<name>.md for reference."

Plain-text fallback: "Promote to a decision?" — yes / no.

On Yes, dispatch hv-decide via the Skill tool with --from-spike <name> as the argument, then continue to Step 7 once it returns.

On Skip, print one line — "Spike finding stays in .hv/spikes/<name>.md. Run /hv-decide --from-spike <name> later if you change your mind." — then continue to Step 7.

Step 7 (Finish mode) — Optional Follow-Up

If the decision is viable and the user is ready to act, offer one of:

• "Capture the real implementation as a backlog item? (/hv-capture)"
• "Write a plan for it now? (/hv-plan)"

If not viable or inconclusive, the spike is its own conclusion. Don't push to capture work that the spike just argued against.

Key Principles

• One question per spike. Multiple questions → multiple spikes.
• The branch never merges. Findings come back as a markdown file; code stays on the branch as reference.
• Honest reporting beats salvage. A "not viable" conclusion is just as valuable as "viable".
• No stubs or partial work back to main. Anything on main is real implementation.
• Spikes are scoped, not open-ended. A spike open >2 weeks without a decision is stale — close it inconclusive and recapture if needed.
• Spikes feed decisions, not the other way around. A viable / not viable / depends-on-X finish is a natural moment to ask whether the conclusion is a commitment future work must respect; an inconclusive finish is not.
• Umbrella spikes are per-repo. A spike's branch lives in the sub-repo named in its frontmatter repo: field; the spike file itself stays at the umbrella root.

References

• references/banner-preamble.md — Banner-print rule shared by every skill.
• references/umbrella-mode.md — Umbrella-mode helpers, registry shape, and Repos: field semantics.