Hv qa

Print the banner below verbatim before any other action — skip if dispatched as a subagent. See references/banner-preamble.md.

════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  🧪  hv-qa  ·  QA the built product (not the diff)
  triggers: "qa this", "kick the tires"  ·  pairs: hv-review, hv-ship
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

hv-qa — Product Quality Assurance

/hv-qa and /hv-review are deliberately separate:

• /hv-review answers "does this diff make sense" — reads commits + diff, no execution.
• /hv-qa answers "does the product work" — runs tests, probes, scans against the built artifact.

They never call each other. /hv-ship may call both, each behind its own config flag.

Configuration

Read .hv/config.json:

• models.orchestrator — model dispatching the runners (default opus).
• qa.gate — "advisory" (default) emits verdict, never blocks ship; "blocking" causes ship.qa: true invocations to halt on FAIL.
• qa.afterWork — false (default). When true, /hv-work invokes /hv-qa run post-cycle if touched files match a QA target's Watch globs.
• ship.qa — false (default). When true, /hv-ship calls /hv-qa run between /hv-review and the merge/PR step.

When to Use

• "QA this", "kick the tires", "does this actually work?" — manual exploratory run.
• After a feature lands and before opening a PR, when you want product-level evidence (not just diff sanity).
• First-time setup on a new repo or new umbrella sub-repo — bootstrap the strategy file.

When NOT to Use

• You want diff-level review → /hv-review. QA does not read commits.
• Nothing built yet → finish via /hv-work first. QA needs an artifact to probe.
• You want to change code based on findings → consume the report, then /hv-work or /hv-debug.

Modes

/hv-qa shares the three-mode skeleton with /hv-ship's Docs Mode (scaffold / after-work / audit) — see references/three-mode-skill-shape.md. Divergences:

Aspect	/hv-qa
Artifact root	.hv/qa/<target>.md — per-target strategy files. In umbrella mode, <target> is a registered repo name; in single-repo mode, <target> is a user-named surface (web, api, cli, ...)
Audience	AI runners + contributors triaging findings
Mode-3 name	restructure (re-probe surfaces, retire dead strategies, fix broken commands)
After-work approval gate	opt-in via qa.afterWork: true; default off — QA runs are slow and may need infra
After-work trigger gate	qa.afterWork: true AND touched files match a target's Watch globs
Authoring tier	Tier S for run (banner, TaskCreate, integer Step headers); Tier C for first-run / restructure (mode-numbered lists)
Commit ownership	run does not commit (read-only verdict); first-run / restructure own a chore(qa): commit

Mode: first-run

Run when .hv/qa/ is empty for the active scope (umbrella: per-repo; single-repo: when no .hv/qa/*.md files exist).

1. Detect surfaces. Inspect what kind of product this is — never assume browser:
   • package.json with next / vite / react / vue / svelte → web-UI surface
   • App.swift / *.xcodeproj / Package.swift with @main → macOS/iOS app surface
   • openapi.yaml / swagger.json / Express/FastAPI/Hono routes → HTTP-API surface
   • bin/* shell entry / main.py CLI / cobra / clap Rust → CLI surface
   • lib/ or src/ with no entry point + tests dir → library surface (unit + contract only)
   • Mixed → multiple targets, one strategy file each
2. Detect existing test infra. find for: playwright.config.*, cypress.config.*, pytest.ini, jest.config.*, vitest.config.*, *XCTest*, *.smoke.sh, tests/, test/, __tests__/, CI workflow files. Note what's already wired; missing tooling stays a note, not a proposal.
3. Probe quality tooling. Check for: Lighthouse / Pagespeed, axe-core / pa11y, ZAP / semgrep configs, dependency audit (npm audit, pip-audit, cargo-audit), perf budgets, contract tests. Presence only — never propose installing anything in this mode.
4. Propose strategy. For each target, draft a one-screen strategy with these sections — show the user before writing:
   • Surface — what kind of thing this is (web, API, CLI, mobile, lib)
   • Watch globs — paths whose changes should trigger after-work QA
   • Executable checks — runners with concrete commands, grouped by pillar (performance / security / functional). Each entry: name · command · pass criterion. Examples: lighthouse --budget-path=.budget.json · pa11y http://localhost:3000 · npm audit --audit-level=high · bash test/smoke.sh · playwright test --grep @smoke.
   • Audit checks — usability dimensions to inspect by hand or LLM (empty states, error recovery, copy clarity, first-run flow). Rubric, no commands.
   • Infra requirements — what must be running for run mode (e.g. npm run dev on :3000, deployed staging URL, sandbox creds). Skill refuses to run if these aren't met.
   • Out of scope — explicit non-goals (e.g. "no load testing", "no real-payment flows").
5. Approve & write. Use AskUserQuestion with Approve as drafted (Recommended) / Edit before writing / Cancel. On approval, write .hv/qa/<target>.md with frontmatter (target, surface, summary, created, touched, watch-globs) and the five body sections.
6. Index. Run .hv/bin/hv-qa-index to regenerate the ## Project QA block in CLAUDE.md.
7. Commit. chore(qa): scaffold QA strategy for <target> (.hv/qa/, ## Project QA block).

Mode: run

Tier S — banner already printed above.

Initialize task list. Follow the canonical pattern in references/task-list-init.md — load TaskCreate via ToolSearch select:TaskCreate,TaskUpdate if needed, then create one task per phase below.

Phases:

1. Resolve scope — which targets to QA (Step 2)
2. Load strategies — read .hv/qa/<target>.md for each (Step 3)
3. Infra preflight — verify Infra requirements are met (Step 4)
4. Execute checks — dispatch runner subagents (Step 5)
5. Audit pass — usability findings (Step 6)
6. Score & verdict — aggregate (Step 7)
7. Report — relay to user (Step 8)

Step 1 — Preflight

.hv/bin/hv-preflight

See docs/reference/preflight.md for exit-code handling.

Step 2 — Resolve Scope

If user named a target (/hv-qa run web), use it. Otherwise:

• Umbrella mode (.hv/repos.json non-empty): default to the repo of the current branch (resolve via .hv/bin/hv-resolve-repo). User can pass --repo <name> or --all.
• Single-repo mode: default to all .hv/qa/*.md entries.

If no strategy file exists for the resolved scope, halt and tell the user to run /hv-qa first-run.

Step 3 — Load Strategies

For each target, read .hv/qa/<target>.md via .hv/bin/hv-qa-query <target>. Parse the five body sections. Reject any strategy missing Executable checks or Infra requirements — surface as a config error and route to restructure.

Step 4 — Infra Preflight

For each target, verify everything under Infra requirements:

• HTTP probes for dev/staging URLs (curl with 5s timeout)
• Process checks for required binaries (command -v playwright, etc.)
• Env-var presence for credentials (don't print values)

If any infra is missing, emit INFRA-FAIL with the missing items and halt — partial QA produces false confidence. Tell the user exactly what to start / install.

Step 5 — Execute Checks

Dispatch one subagent per check group (per pillar per target) in parallel via the Agent tool — see references/subagent-dispatch.md. Each subagent:

• Runs the commands from its assigned Executable checks entries.
• Captures stdout, exit code, and artifact paths (screenshots, HAR files, reports). Artifacts write under .hv/qa-runs/<timestamp>/<target>/<check>/.
• Returns a structured result: { name, command, exitCode, passCriterion, met, evidence }.

The orchestrator does not run the checks itself — parallel dispatch is the point. Aggregate the results.

Step 6 — Audit Pass

Dispatch one subagent (Opus, no prior context) per target with the Audit checks rubric, screenshots from Step 5 if available, and read-only access to the running surface. Return: array of { dimension, severity (P0|P1|P2|P3), observation, evidence, suggested_fix }.

Audit findings never produce automated pass/fail. They surface as a separate report section, severity-ranked.

Step 7 — Score & Verdict

Aggregate per target:

• PASS — all executable checks met: true, audit findings have no P0.
• CONCERNS — executable checks all met, but audit has P0/P1 findings, OR ≥1 executable check passed only with a warning. Ship is allowed; user owns the call.
• FAIL — any executable check met: false, OR audit has a P0 with severity: blocker.

In umbrella --all mode, the rollup verdict is the worst-of across targets. Per-target verdicts still report individually.

Step 8 — Report

Print a structured report:

QA verdict: <PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL>

Targets:
  <target-1>: <verdict>
    Executable checks: <n passed> / <n total>
    Audit findings: <n P0>, <n P1>, <n P2>, <n P3>
  ...

Failed executable checks:
  - <name> — <command> — <evidence>
  ...

Audit findings (P0/P1 inline; full list at <path>):
  - [P0] <dimension>: <observation>  — fix: <suggested_fix>
  ...

Evidence: .hv/qa-runs/<timestamp>/

Route per references/review-verdict-routing.md — same PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL contract; use carrier label QA concerns: when invoked from /hv-ship (per the routing reference's "Carrier-label override").

Step 9 — Routing

• Standalone: relay verdict to user per Producer-side relay in the verdict-routing reference.
• From /hv-ship: return the verdict only. /hv-ship consumes per Consumer routing table, gated by qa.gate:
  • qa.gate: "advisory" — /hv-ship reports findings but never halts.
  • qa.gate: "blocking" — FAIL halts; CONCERNS prompts the user.

Mode: restructure

Run on demand when strategy files have drifted from the project (new surfaces, retired tools, dead targets).

1. Re-run the Detect surfaces and Detect existing test infra probes from first-run.
2. Diff against current .hv/qa/*.md — flag: targets with no matching surface (dead), surfaces with no target (uncovered), commands referencing tools not installed (broken), Watch globs matching no files (stale).
3. Propose changes — archive dead, draft new, fix broken, update globs — show to user before writing.
4. On approval, write the changes, run .hv/bin/hv-qa-index, commit chore(qa): restructure QA strategy (<summary>).

Rules

• Strategy is data; runners are dispatched. The skill never hardcodes Playwright, smoke, axe, or anything else. Every command comes from .hv/qa/<target>.md.
• Three pillars, three shapes. Performance + security = executable, pass/fail. Usability = audit, severity-ranked. Don't pretend usability is testable.
• Read-only on run. The verdict is the entire product. Never edit code; never stage. Artifacts write under .hv/qa-runs/<timestamp>/ — gitignored by default (bulky and regeneratable from qa/<target>.md).
• Infra-fail fast. Missing dev server, missing creds, missing binary → halt before running anything. Partial QA produces false confidence.
• Evidence over opinion. Every audit finding cites file:line, screenshot path, or a reproducer command. Vibes don't ship.
• Stay separate from /hv-review. Never read commits or diffs. If you find yourself wanting to, the request belongs to /hv-review.

Failure Modes

• No strategy file — halt; tell user to run /hv-qa first-run. Don't auto-scaffold.
• Infra unavailable — INFRA-FAIL verdict; halt. User starts services, re-runs.
• Runner subagent timeout — that check is met: false with evidence: "timeout after Ns". QA continues; verdict reflects the failed check.
• Strategy references retired tool — that check is met: false with evidence: "command not found". Surface in restructure mode.

References

• references/banner-preamble.md — Banner-print rule.
• references/three-mode-skill-shape.md — Shared skeleton with /hv-ship Docs Mode.
• references/subagent-dispatch.md — Parallel runner pattern.
• references/review-verdict-routing.md — PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL contract; QA reuses it.
• references/umbrella-mode.md — Per-repo resolution for --repo / --all.
• references/post-cycle-trigger-gate.md — When qa.afterWork: true should fire.