Cybersecurity dashboard ux
Skill kylejryan/better-code/skills/cybersecurity-dashboard-ux
Use this skill when designing, building, or reviewing UI/UX for cybersecurity SaaS dashboards and security platforms. Triggers when the user asks to design a security dashboard, build an AppSec UI, create a vulnerability explorer, design a DevSecOps portal, build security posture views, create risk dashboards, design alert triage interfaces, or build any security-focused web application UI. Also use when improving existing security product interfaces for usability, designing role-based views for AppSec vs engineering personas, or building drill-down patterns for security data. Do NOT use for general website design, marketing pages, or non-security product UIs.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add kylejryan/better-code --skill cybersecurity-dashboard-uxAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
5.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Cybersecurity Dashboard UX
Security dashboards serve two fundamentally different audiences with the same underlying data: AppSec teams who need org-wide risk posture and triage at scale, and engineers who need scoped, actionable work queues for their own services. Every design decision must account for this split.
The user's primary emotion when using a security dashboard is anxiety — "am I safe? what's broken? what do I need to do?" Good security UX replaces anxiety with clarity. Bad security UX amplifies anxiety with walls of alerts, unexplained severity scores, and data without context.
When to Apply
Apply these patterns when:
- Designing security dashboards or risk posture views
- Building vulnerability explorers, incident queues, or triage interfaces
- Creating role-based views for AppSec vs engineering personas
- Designing drill-down navigation for security data
- Reviewing security product UI for usability
- Building DevSecOps portals or security posture management tools
Rule Categories by Priority
| Priority | Category | Impact | Prefix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Personas | CRITICAL | persona- |
| 2 | Information Architecture | CRITICAL | ia- |
| 3 | Screen Design | HIGH | screen- |
| 4 | Drill-Down & Navigation | HIGH | drilldown- |
| 5 | Visual Design | MEDIUM-HIGH | visual- |
| 6 | Interaction Patterns | MEDIUM | interaction- |
| 7 | Design Checklist | MEDIUM | checklist- |
Core Principles
Dual-Persona Design: Every widget has a clear primary persona. AppSec sees org-wide risk with slicing by team, env, and severity. Engineers see their own services by default with scoped work queues. One view for both serves neither.
Information Layers: Structure as Overview → Lens (role) → Explorer → Detail. Each layer increases specificity and decreases scope. Every summary card, chart segment, and table row has a clear drill-down target.
Problem Space, Not Tool Space: Organize by what users understand — vulnerabilities, secrets, misconfigurations, threats, compliance — never by which scanner produced the data.
Task-First Navigation: Top-level nav mirrors jobs-to-be-done: Monitor, Investigate, Fix, Configure, Report. Users should never wonder which tab has what they need.
Severity Colors Are Sacred: Critical=red, High=orange, Medium=yellow/amber, Low=blue. Never use severity colors for non-severity purposes. Red means critical. Always.
The Practical V1 Screen Set
Build these screens in priority order:
1. Org Overview (AppSec Home) — the situation room
2. Engineering Home ("My Security Work") — the engineer's action center
3. Service Detail Page — shared, role-adapted
4. Vulnerability Explorer — power-user investigation tool
5. Issue Detail Page — deep-linkable, full context
6. Incident/Threat Explorer — if runtime detection is in scope
7. Policy/Configuration Panel — rule and policy management
8. Audit Log / Activity Timeline — who did what when
Screens 1-5 are the core loop. Each screen should be functional standalone — a user who deep-links to the issue detail page shouldn't need to navigate from the overview first.
How to Use
Read individual reference files for detailed specifications:
references/persona-appsec.md
references/persona-engineer.md
references/screen-org-overview.md
references/screen-vuln-explorer.md
references/drilldown-navigation-chains.md
references/visual-severity-colors.md
references/checklist-comprehensive.md
references/_sections.md
Each reference file contains:
- Detailed specifications for that aspect of security dashboard design
- Specific widget layouts, interaction patterns, and UX rules
- Concrete examples of correct and incorrect approaches
Quick Design Checklist
Before shipping a security dashboard screen, verify:
- Every widget has a clear primary persona (AppSec or Engineer)
- Engineers see their own services by default, not the whole org
- Every metric that can trend shows its trend (arrow, sparkline, delta)
- Severity colors used consistently and exclusively for severity
- Every summary card and table row has a clear drill-down target
- Drill-down pre-applies filters matching source context
- Inline actions available without leaving the current view
- "Is it safe to deploy?" answerable in under 3 seconds from engineering home
- Organized by problem space, not by tool/scanner
- Every view is deep-linkable via URL
A security dashboard succeeds when users open it proactively — not because an alert forced them to, but because it's the fastest way to understand their security posture and take action.