agentsclimarketplace

Test

Skill KurtLehnardt/agentic-tools/skills/test

Generate comprehensive test suites for existing code without modifying implementation. Trigger: add tests, test coverage, write tests for, test this module.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add KurtLehnardt/agentic-tools --skill test

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

/test — Standalone Test Generation Pipeline

You are an orchestrator dispatching agents to analyze existing code and generate comprehensive test suites. Unlike /build (which writes tests alongside implementation), /test targets code that already exists but lacks coverage. You do not modify implementation — you only add tests.

What This Skill Does

  1. Analyzes the codebase to identify untested or under-tested modules
  2. Prioritizes by risk (public APIs, auth, payments, data mutations)
  3. Generates test files following existing test patterns
  4. Validates tests pass against current implementation
  5. Reports coverage delta

Phase 1: COVERAGE ANALYSIS

Dispatch an Explore subagent to map test coverage:

Subagent: Task tool, subagent_type="Explore"
Prompt: Analyze the test coverage of this codebase.

        1. Find all existing test files (*.test.ts, *.spec.ts, *.test.tsx, etc.)
        2. For each source file, determine if it has a corresponding test file
        3. For tested files, assess coverage depth:
           - Does it test the happy path?
           - Does it test error cases?
           - Does it test edge cases (empty input, max values, concurrent access)?
           - Does it test integration with dependencies?
        4. Categorize each source file:
           - UNTESTED: no test file exists
           - SHALLOW: test file exists but only covers happy path
           - ADEQUATE: covers happy path + error cases
           - THOROUGH: covers happy path + errors + edge cases + integration

        5. For untested/shallow files, assess risk:
           - HIGH: auth, payments, data mutations, API routes, security
           - MEDIUM: business logic, state management, data transformation
           - LOW: UI components, utilities, constants

        Return a prioritized list: highest-risk untested files first.

Phase 2: TEST PLAN

Based on the coverage analysis, create a test plan:

Prioritization order:

  1. HIGH risk + UNTESTED — critical gaps
  2. HIGH risk + SHALLOW — needs depth
  3. MEDIUM risk + UNTESTED — important gaps
  4. MEDIUM risk + SHALLOW — nice to have
  5. LOW risk — only if time permits

For each target file, define:

  • Test file path (following existing naming convention)
  • Test categories to write (unit, integration, property-based)
  • Key scenarios to cover
  • Mocks/fixtures needed
  • Estimated test count

Phase 3: TEST GENERATION

Dispatch Ralph workers to write tests. Each worker gets a subset of test files.

Subagent: Task tool, subagent_type="general-purpose"
Prompt: You are a senior test engineer writing tests for existing code.
        You MUST NOT modify any implementation files. Only create/modify test files.

        [contents of references/test-writer-prompt.md]

        Files to test:
        [TARGET_FILE_LIST]

        Existing test patterns to follow:
        [EXAMPLE_TEST_FROM_CODEBASE]

        For each file, write tests covering:
        1. Happy path — normal expected usage
        2. Error cases — invalid input, missing data, service failures
        3. Edge cases — empty arrays, null values, boundary conditions
        4. Integration — verify correct interaction with dependencies

        After writing each test file:
        1. Run: npm test [test-file-path]
        2. Verify all tests PASS against current implementation
        3. If a test fails, the implementation is correct — fix your test
        4. Commit: test(coverage): add tests for [module-name]

Scope discipline:

  • Only create test files. Never modify source files.
  • If a source file has a bug that makes testing impossible, note it and move on.
  • If a source file is untestable (tight coupling, no dependency injection), note it as tech debt.

Phase 4: VALIDATION

After all workers complete:

# Run full test suite
npm test

# Check for regressions (no previously passing tests should now fail)
# Run coverage report if available
npx vitest run --coverage

Phase 5: COVERAGE REPORT

Test Coverage Delta:
  Before: 42% (23/55 files tested)
  After:  71% (39/55 files tested)
  New test files: 16
  New test cases: 147

  High-risk coverage:
    ✓ auth/login.ts: 12 tests (was 0)
    ✓ api/payments/route.ts: 8 tests (was 0)
    ✓ lib/pipeline/summary.ts: 15 tests (was 3)
    ✗ api/webhooks/stripe/route.ts: skipped (untestable without refactor)

  Remaining gaps:
    - api/webhooks/stripe/route.ts: needs dependency injection refactor
    - lib/legacy/parser.ts: complex coupling, recommend refactor first

Test Quality Standards

Tests generated by this skill must meet:

  1. No implementation coupling — tests should verify behavior, not internal structure
  2. Deterministic — no flaky tests. Mock time, random values, external services.
  3. Isolated — each test runs independently. No shared mutable state.
  4. Fast — unit tests under 100ms each. Integration tests under 1s.
  5. Descriptive names — it("returns 401 when auth token is expired") not it("test 3")
  6. Arrange-Act-Assert — clear structure in every test
  7. No console.log — use proper assertions, not manual inspection

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 627,801. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.