agentsclimarketplace

Violetta ai task skill

Skill kochenevsky/violetta-ai-task-skill

VIOLETTA: AI-native task standard — Cursor Agent Skill (Verifiable, Integrated, Observable, Living, Executable, Transferable, Trainable, Aware). By Anton Kochenevsky.

Install
npx -y skills add kochenevsky/violetta-ai-task-skill

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Formulates and verifies work items using the VIOLETTA standard for AI-native tasks (Verifiable, Integrated, Observable, Living, Executable, Transferable, Trainable, Aware). Use for admin panels, BPM, B2B portals, internal tools (CRM, billing, approvals, integrations), agent task specs, ticket or Notion review, or when the user mentions VIOLETTA, AI-native tasks, or agent-ready work.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

5.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

VIOLETTA — AI-native task standard

Mnemonic: every task must be verifiable, integrated, observable, living, executable, transferable, trainable, and aware — V I O L E T T A.

Methodology: Medium (EN) · vc.ru (RU)

Where this skill shines

Anywhere tasks go beyond simple CRUD:

  • Admin panels / back-office — permissions, entities, bulk operations, audit → Observable, Verifiable
  • Business processes & approvals — multi-step chains, escalations, context shifts → Living, Transferable
  • B2B portals & client dashboards — integrations, SLA, contract context → Integrated, Aware
  • Internal systems (CRM, billing, support, data pipelines) — handoffs between people and agents, incident learning → Transferable, Trainable, Executable

A task for an agent is a living, autonomous unit of work, not a static ticket. Without the properties below it is closer to a note than an AI-native task.

Eight properties

LetterPropertyMeaning
VVerifiableMeasurable success criterion; can be checked programmatically or via checklist
IIntegratedConnected to the ecosystem. Straight-through processing (STP): the task runs end-to-end without manual steps. Data sources, APIs, tools, result format, and downstream actions are stated explicitly — the agent does not search for information, the task brings it
OObservableReal-time status + full decision history (audit trail)
LLivingUpdates when context changes, or the context is explicitly marked as stable
EExecutableAgent can execute without clarifications; HITL only at declared points
TTransferableHandoff to another agent/person without losing history or artifacts
TTrainableAfter failure the cause and lesson are recorded; next run is smarter
AAwareThe "why", constraints, prior attempts, and decisions live inside the task

Living and Trainable fundamentally rely on AI capabilities by design.

Checklist (V-I-O-L-E-T-T-A)

  • V — Is it clear when to stop and what counts as success?
  • I — Are systems, data, tools, and result format specified?
  • O — Is progress visible, with a trail of actions and decisions?
  • L — How does the task update when context changes (or is context explicitly stable)?
  • E — Can it execute right now automatically (with declared HITL points)?
  • T Transferable — Can another executor pick it up without a briefing?
  • T Trainable — Is there something to record after failure?
  • A — Will the agent understand without a series of clarifying questions?

All 8 out of 8 must be checked. Any unchecked item → the task is not ready; refine the formulation or label it as a spike/note, not a production task for an agent.

How the agent should respond (required structure)

  1. Formulation / review — table or list: one line per VIOLETTA letter — "covered / gap".
  2. Reviewing someone else's task — list gaps by property + suggest concrete fixes (criteria, links, artifacts).
  3. Decomposition — each sub-task must be at least E + V; keep shared context in the parent's A.

Task template (copy-paste)

## Task (VIOLETTA)
**Aware — why / context:**
**Verifiable — definition of done:**
**Integrated — data, systems, format:**
**Observable — how progress and history are tracked:**
**Executable — trigger; HITL only if:**
**Living — what to do when priorities/data change:**
**Transferable — what to hand off to the next executor:**
**Trainable — what to record after failure:**

Trigger phrases

  • "Check this task against VIOLETTA"
  • "Formulate a VIOLETTA-compliant ticket"
  • "Review this ticket for agent readiness"
  • "Is this task AI-native?"
  • "Break down this goal using VIOLETTA"

Examples: weak vs strong

  • Weak: "Improve onboarding."

  • Stronger: "Raise registration → first-action conversion from 23% to 35% in 30 days; funnel in analytics X; do not touch the payment flow."

  • Weak: "Prepare the quarterly report."

  • Stronger: "Pull metrics from [BI/table], use template Y, send to Z by [date]; if access is missing → record in task and stop (HITL)."

More examples (admin panels, B2B, pipelines): examples.md.

Anti-patterns

  • A single abstract verb with no criterion ("improve", "optimize", "fix").
  • A link to "the docs" without path, version, or section.
  • "Do it like the competitor" without an artifact or comparison metric.
  • No scope boundary (what is not part of the task).

Limitations

  • VIOLETTA is about task formulation quality; it does not replace security reviews, access controls, or risk approvals.
  • Destructive or bulk changes to production require explicit permission and scoped boundaries per repository policies.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.