Compact
Engineering habits for coding agents that keep scope, context, and quality under control. Build with intent — 如切如磋,如琢如磨
npx -y skills add KKenny0/Taku --skill compactAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Create a recoverable active-work brief for context-heavy coding, design, debugging, review, research, or handoff sessions. Multi-mode context-control habit with resume, handoff, debug, review, design, and research policies.
SKILL.md
6.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Taku Compact - Context-Control Habit
Use /taku-compact to compress active work into a recoverable brief. It is a
bonus utility skill, not a seventh Taku phase.
Rule labels: [IRON LAW] means a non-negotiable correctness constraint. [GUIDANCE] means a strong default that may adapt when context justifies it.
Compact preserves current task state. Reflect preserves long-term learnings.
Never write .taku/learnings from this skill. You may list
reflect_candidates, but /taku-reflect is the only path that can promote them
after user approval. A reflect_candidates entry is not a recorded learning and
must never be worded as one.
Host Boundary
This skill does not control the host transcript, context window, message slicing, archive behavior, or clear behavior. It creates a handoff brief from available evidence. Do not claim that tool calls, tool results, or transcript events were compacted.
If a future host exposes transcript ranges, record them as retrieval hints only after verifying they are available. Otherwise use file, diff, command, log, prior-brief, and current-session anchors.
Mode Selection
Accept an explicit mode when the user provides one:
| Mode | Use When | Preserve First |
|---|---|---|
resume | The same agent or user will continue later | next step, open todos, blockers, recent decisions |
handoff | Another agent or session needs to continue | background, scope, decisions, files, verification, next step |
debug | Investigation or failed checks are in progress | symptoms, reproduction, evidence, failed hypotheses, next probe |
review | A dirty diff or delivery review is next | diff intent, risk areas, test coverage, scope drift, blockers |
design | Think/Plan/product discussion needs preserving | constraints, tradeoffs, confirmed decisions, open questions |
research | Source reading or technical exploration needs preserving | sources, findings, confidence, unresolved questions, followups |
If no mode is provided, infer it from the request and current state. Record
mode_selection_reason in the brief. Prefer handoff when multiple modes fit
and the user asked for general compacting.
State Scan Contract
[IRON LAW] Run an evidence-first state scan before writing the brief. Do not summarize from memory first.
1. Durable Sources
Read or inspect these when present:
DESIGN.mdPLAN.mdREADME.mdAGENTS.mdCLAUDE.md.taku/context/current.md.taku/context/compact-*.md.taku/learnings/*.jsonlas approved context only
Only include stable-layer details that affect the active task. If a durable
source is missing or irrelevant, record that in source_coverage; do not treat
it as a blocker.
2. Repo Evidence
Inspect git and file-system evidence when a repo is available:
git status --shortgit diff --statgit diff --name-only- relevant
git diffhunks for changed files git log -n 3 --oneline
Changed files must come from git or the file system, not guesswork. A clean diff means no durable code changes were observed; it does not mean no progress occurred.
3. Session-Visible State
Treat visible conversation and tool outputs as first-class state:
- recent user decisions and corrections
- explicit constraints and preferences
- command results visible in this session
- tool output, agent findings, review findings, and debug observations
- design/research progress that has not been written to project files
Mark conversation-derived claims as user and command/tool-output claims as
tool. Do not present them as file-backed project truth unless they were
written to a durable artifact.
4. Source Tags and Confidence
Every important claim must carry one of these source categories:
file: project file, Taku context file, approved learning, or file-system inspectiongit: status, diff, or commit historytool: command output or tool result visible in the sessionuser: explicit user statement, correction, or approvalinferred: agent synthesis from other evidenceunknown: unavailable or unverified evidence
Do not say tests passed unless actual command output or explicit user-provided evidence shows that.
Include state_confidence for goal, changed files, verification, and next step
using high, medium, low, or unknown.
Brief Output
Use references/compact-brief.md as the local brief scaffold. Fill every applicable
field. Remove irrelevant mode-specific sections, but keep unknowns,
retrieval_hints, and completeness_check.
Default persistence:
- Create
.taku/context/if needed. - Write the latest brief to
.taku/context/current.md. - Write the same brief to
.taku/context/compact-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS.md.
If files cannot or should not be written in the current host, output the brief in
chat and mark persistence: chat_only.
Mode-Specific Requirements
Resume
Include:
- the first concrete next action
- unresolved blockers
- open todos
- recent session context needed to avoid rework
Handoff
Include:
- background and current scope
- decisions and user constraints
- changed files or confirmation that none were observed
- verification state
- exact restart instructions for the next agent
Debug
Include:
- observed symptoms
- reproduction steps
- evidence collected
- failed hypotheses and why they failed
- next probe
Never describe a fix as verified without evidence.
Review
Include:
- diff intent
- changed files
- risk areas
- test coverage observed
- scope drift check against
PLAN.mdor user intent when available - pre-ship blockers
Design
Include:
- user constraints
- options considered
- tradeoffs
- confirmed decisions
- open questions
- recommended next planning step
Research
Include:
- sources inspected
- key findings
- confidence by finding
- unresolved questions
- follow-up searches or files to inspect
Completeness Check
Before finishing, verify the brief includes:
- user constraints or
unknown - open todos or
none_observed - failed attempts or
none_observed - verification state with evidence or
not_established - changed files with sources or
none_observed - retrieval hints
- unknowns
- mode-specific required fields
- source tags for important claims
If a required item is missing, fix the brief before presenting it.
Non-Goals
- Do not edit implementation files.
- Do not update
PLAN.mdstatus. - Do not run formatters or codegen.
- Do not commit, push, or open a PR.
- Do not fix bugs.
- Do not write
.taku/learnings. - Do not add archive or clear semantics.