Competitive feature matrix builder
70+ curated agent skills for Claude Cowork and Claude.ai — ready-to-use tools for non-technical users: project management, productivity, and AI workflow automation
npx -y skills add KirKruglov/claude-skills-kit --skill competitive-feature-matrix-builderAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 14 stars14 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Build a comparative feature matrix and gap analysis from a folder of competitor notes (md/txt). Works fully offline — no web access needed. Use when preparing roadmap reviews, competitive analysis sessions, or feature prioritization. Triggers: 'build feature matrix', 'competitive feature matrix', 'compare competitors from notes', 'составь feature matrix', 'матрица фич конкурентов'.
SKILL.md
8.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Competitive Feature Matrix Builder
This skill reads a folder of competitor notes (md or txt files) and produces a comparative feature matrix with a gap analysis and recommendations. No web access or API required — fully file-based, designed for Cowork.
Input:
- Folder path containing competitor notes (one file per competitor recommended; md or txt format)
- Optional: a file named
your-product.mdorown-product.mdfor self-comparison
Output:
- Markdown response with three sections: Feature Matrix (table), Gap Analysis, and Recommendations
Language Detection
Detect the user's language from their message:
- If Russian (or contains Cyrillic): respond in Russian
- If English (or other Latin-script language): respond in English
- If ambiguous: respond in the language of the trigger phrase used
Instructions
Step 1: Validate Input
-
Check that the user provided a folder path.
- If no path given: stop and respond: "Provide the path to a folder containing competitor notes in md or txt format."
-
Scan the folder for md and txt files.
- If folder is empty or does not exist: stop and respond: "No files found at the provided path. Provide a folder path containing competitor notes in md or txt format."
- Report the number of files found: "Found N files: [list filenames]."
-
Check if any file is named
your-product.mdorown-product.md.- If found: include as "Your Product" column in the matrix.
- If not found: proceed without self-comparison column; add a closing note: "Add a file named
your-product.mdto enable self-comparison and gap analysis."
Step 2: Extract Competitor Names and Features
-
For each file (excluding
your-product.md/own-product.mdif present):- Competitor name: Use the first-level heading (# Name) if present; otherwise use the filename without extension (e.g.,
salesforce-notes.md→ "Salesforce"). - Feature extraction: Scan the file for product features, capabilities, and attributes using these signals:
- Explicit feature lists (bullet points, numbered lists, tables)
- Sentences with action verbs: "supports", "offers", "includes", "has", "provides", "enables"
- Comparison language: "unlike X, they have…", "also includes…", "unique to them…"
- Section headings describing product areas (e.g., "Integrations", "Analytics", "Pricing")
- Competitor name: Use the first-level heading (# Name) if present; otherwise use the filename without extension (e.g.,
-
For
your-product.md/own-product.md(if present):- Apply the same extraction logic.
- Label column as "Your Product" in the matrix.
-
If a file contains no extractable product features (e.g., meeting notes, financial data, contact list):
- Skip the file and log: "Skipped [filename] — no product features found."
- If all files are skipped: stop and respond: "No product features could be extracted from the provided files. Ensure your notes describe competitor product capabilities, features, or attributes."
Step 3: Normalize the Feature List
-
Compile all extracted features into a single master list.
-
Deduplicate and normalize:
- Group features that describe the same capability under different names (e.g., "REST API", "API access", "API integration" → group as "API / Integrations").
- Use the most descriptive name for the grouped row.
- Keep a footnote listing original terms grouped together (append after the matrix).
-
Sort features: group by product area if discernible (e.g., "Core Features", "Integrations", "Analytics", "Pricing/Packaging"), then alphabetically within groups.
Step 4: Build the Feature Matrix
-
Create a markdown table:
- Rows: one per normalized feature
- Columns: one per competitor + "Your Product" (if present)
-
For each cell, assign a symbol:
- ✓ — feature explicitly mentioned as present
- ✗ — feature explicitly mentioned as absent or not supported
- ? — not mentioned in the notes (unknown)
-
Add a legend line below the table:
*Legend: ✓ = confirmed present, ✗ = confirmed absent, ? = not mentioned in notes*
Edge Cases:
- If only one competitor file is present: build a single-column matrix; add note: "Gap analysis requires 2+ competitors — only the feature list is generated here."
- If files contain mostly unstructured prose (no lists or headings): extract features from paragraph context; flag: "Features extracted from unstructured text — review for accuracy before sharing."
Step 5: Gap Analysis
-
Identify gaps in Your Product (only if
your-product.mdwas provided):- Feature gaps = features where 2+ competitors have ✓ and Your Product has ✗ or ?
- Sort by number of competitors with the feature (descending = highest priority first)
- Assign priority: High (all competitors have it), Medium (majority), Low (minority but 2+)
-
Identify unique competitor differentiators:
- Features that only one competitor has (✓ in exactly one column) — these are niche signals to monitor, not immediate gaps
-
Identify your differentiators (only if
your-product.mdwas provided):- Features where Your Product has ✓ and all competitors have ✗ or ? — these are unique advantages
-
If no
your-product.md: list features present in 2+ competitors as "Common features across the competitive landscape" (ordered by coverage breadth).
Step 6: Recommendations
-
Write 2–4 short recommendation bullets based on the gap analysis:
- High-priority gaps: suggest evaluating for next roadmap cycle
- Watch-list items: suggest monitoring for adoption trends
- Differentiators: suggest protecting and amplifying
-
Keep recommendations specific to feature names found — do not generate generic advice.
Step 7: Output
Assemble and output the full response in three sections: Feature Matrix → Gap Analysis → Recommendations.
Add an opening line: "Processed N files: [competitor list]. Matrix covers M features."
Negative Cases
- Empty folder or invalid path: Stop with message: "No files found at the provided path. Provide a folder path containing competitor notes in md or txt format."
- All files non-feature content: Stop with message: "No product features could be extracted from the provided files."
- Single file, no your-product.md: Build feature list only; note gap analysis is not possible with one competitor.
Output Format
Processed N files: Competitor A, Competitor B, Competitor C. Matrix covers M features.
## Feature Matrix
| Feature | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C | Your Product |
|---------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| API / Integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile App | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Analytics Dashboard | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
*Legend: ✓ = confirmed present, ✗ = confirmed absent, ? = not mentioned in notes*
---
## Gap Analysis
**Gaps in Your Product (features 2+ competitors have that you don't):**
| Feature | Competitors With It | Priority |
|---------|---------------------|---------|
| Mobile App | Competitor A, Competitor C | High |
| Analytics Dashboard | Competitor B, Competitor C | Medium |
**Unique Competitor Differentiators (only one competitor has):**
- [Feature X]: only Competitor B — monitor for broader adoption
**Your Differentiators:**
- [Feature Y]: unique to your product — protect and amplify
---
## Recommendations
1. **High priority:** Mobile App — 2/3 competitors have it. Evaluate for next planning cycle.
2. **Medium priority:** Analytics Dashboard — 2/3 competitors have it. Gather user demand signal before committing.
3. **Watch:** [Feature X] — niche differentiator for Competitor B; track if others adopt it.