Phd proposal
π Professional Multi-Agent Skills
npx -y skills add kinhluan/skills --skill phd-proposalAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Write, structure, or review a PhD/Master's research proposal. Use when drafting a research proposal, preparing for committee review, writing a thesis outline, or aligning methodology with academic requirements.
SKILL.md
5.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
PhD/Master's Research Proposal
Structure and write a rigorous research proposal that satisfies committee requirements.
Standard Proposal Structure (IEEE/ACM CS)
1. Title & Abstract (~200 words)
2. Introduction (~500 words)
3. Related Work (~800 words)
4. Research Questions (~200 words)
5. Methodology (~1000 words) β most important
6. Preliminary Results (~500 words, if any)
7. Timeline & Milestones (table/Gantt)
8. Expected Contributions (~300 words)
9. References (BibTeX)
Section-by-Section Guidance
1. Title & Abstract
Title formula: [Method/Approach] for [Problem] in [Domain/Context]
Example: "Federated Multi-Level Feedback Queue Scheduling for Resource-Constrained Healthcare IoT Networks"
Abstract (one paragraph, no citations, no math):
[Context]: In [domain], [background challenge].
[Gap]: However, [specific gap from literature].
[Approach]: We propose [method name], which [key idea].
[Validation]: We evaluate on [datasets/benchmarks] using [metrics].
[Impact]: Results show [expected outcome], enabling [application].
2. Introduction
- Hook: real-world motivation (1 paragraph)
- Background: what exists (1 paragraph)
- Problem: specific gap (1 paragraph)
- Solution sketch: your approach (1 paragraph)
- Contributions: bulleted list (use
research-questionoutput) - Thesis structure: "Chapter 2 covers..."
3. Related Work
Organize by taxonomy (not chronologically):
3.1 [Approach A] β summarize 3-5 papers, explain why insufficient
3.2 [Approach B] β same
3.3 [Your positioning] β "Unlike X, we address Y by Z"
4. Research Questions
- State main RQ + 2-4 sub-questions (paste from
research-questionskill output) - Each sub-question should be answerable in ~1 chapter/paper
5. Methodology (Most Critical)
5.1 Research Paradigm Choose and justify:
- Quantitative / Qualitative / Mixed
- Paradigm: Design Science Research (DSR) / Experimental / Simulation
5.2 System/Model Design
Input: [what]
Processing: [how β algorithm, model, framework]
Output: [what]
Assumption: [what you assume]
5.3 Experimental Protocol
Datasets: [name, size, source, why chosen]
Baselines: [method1, method2 β why these are fair comparisons]
Metrics: [primary metric] + [secondary metrics]
Evaluation protocol: [k-fold CV / train-val-test split / simulation rounds]
Statistical tests: [t-test / Wilcoxon / effect size β for significance]
5.4 Reproducibility Plan
- Code: GitHub repo (public after publication)
- Environment: Docker / conda environment file
- Seeds: fixed random seeds
- Hardware: specify GPU/CPU specs
6. Preliminary Results
Include if you have any early experiments. Even partial results strengthen the proposal.
- 1-2 preliminary experiments showing feasibility
- Small-scale validation of core idea
- If none: state "Preliminary experiments are planned for Month 3-4"
7. Timeline & Milestones
For a 2-year Master's program (align with milestone-tracker skill):
| Phase | Activity | Duration | Milestone |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Literature review | Month 1-2 | Gap matrix complete |
| 2 | Method design | Month 2-4 | Architecture finalized |
| 3 | Implementation | Month 3-8 | Working prototype |
| 4 | Experiments | Month 7-14 | Results table complete |
| 5 | Writing | Month 13-18 | Draft thesis/paper |
| 6 | Revision | Month 17-21 | Submission ready |
| 7 | Defense | Month 22-23 | Defended β |
8. Expected Contributions
Restate from research-question skill, add:
- Theoretical contribution (if any)
- Practical contribution (system, dataset, tool)
- Publication targets (venues + tier)
Committee Checklist
Before submitting proposal for committee review:
- Problem is clearly stated in 1-2 sentences
- Gap is supported by β₯3 recent papers
- RQ is specific and measurable
- Methodology is detailed enough to replicate
- Baselines are state-of-the-art, fairly chosen
- Timeline is realistic (pad 20% for delays)
- Limitations are acknowledged
- Ethical considerations addressed (IRB, data privacy)
Output Format
Produce a structured Markdown document following the section order above. Export to LaTeX using the paper-writing skill templates.
Links to Other Skills
- Requires β
sota-survey+research-question - Feeds into β
research-design(methodology details) - Feeds into β
milestone-tracker(timeline) - Feeds into β
paper-writing(proposal becomes thesis chapters)