agentsclimarketplace
Sign in

Academic paper review

Skill kimtth/agent-skill-100-lines-or-less/skills/academic-paper-review

Use when: review an academic paper with a structured review form and multiple reviewer personas.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add kimtth/agent-skill-100-lines-or-less --skill academic-paper-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

1.4 KB, 270 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Goal: a fair, specific review that separates contribution from flaws.

Use for:

  • reviewing a paper before submission or as a referee
  • giving structured feedback on a draft
  • assessing whether claims are supported by evidence

Workflow:

  1. Load the paper; extract its text and section structure.
  2. Review from three personas: harsh-but-fair, harsh-critical, open-minded.
  3. For each persona, score with a structured review form (e.g. NeurIPS).
  4. Reflect and refine each review for accuracy and soundness.
  5. Aggregate: average scores, weighting overall and contribution highest.
  6. Write a meta-review: consensus strengths, weaknesses, and a decision.

Assess:

  • novelty relative to prior work
  • soundness of methodology and analysis
  • adequacy of baselines, ablations, and evaluation
  • honesty about limitations and threats to validity

Rules:

  • tie every critique to a specific passage or result
  • find consensus across personas before deciding
  • separate major issues from minor ones; suggest fixes
  • judge the evidence, not the abstract's claims

Rules:

  • tie every critique to a specific passage or result
  • distinguish "wrong" from "not my preference"
  • check claims against the actual evidence, not the abstract
  • be rigorous and fair; acknowledge real strengths

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.