agentsclimarketplace

Awesome logging standards

Skill khasky/awesome-agent-skills/skills/awesome-logging-standards

Skills for AI coding agents: code review, debugging, security audits, refactoring, cleaning up AI-written code and text, and more.

Install
npx -y skills add khasky/awesome-agent-skills --skill awesome-logging-standards

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Applies structured logging, levels, PII handling, and wide-event (canonical log line) patterns. Use when adding or reviewing logs, choosing log levels, designing request logging, after an incident where logs were insufficient or leaked data, or when the user says 'logging', 'log format', 'what should we log', 'логирование'. Do not use for designing the error contract or retry policy itself — use awesome-error-standards.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

7.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Logging Standards

Apply consistent logging so operations are debuggable and compliant without leaking secrets or PII.

When to Activate

  • Adding or refactoring log statements
  • User asks for "logging", "log format", or "what to log"
  • Defining or reviewing logging standards for the project
  • After an incident where logs were insufficient or leaked data

Core Principles

  • Define "working" before instrumenting — Write the 2–4 questions on-call will actually ask ("did checkout succeed for this user?", "which dependency is slow?") and make every signal map to one of them. A log line that answers no operational question is noise.
  • Structured — Prefer key-value fields (e.g. JSON) over long prose so logs are queryable and parseable. Use the same structure across the app (timestamp, level, message, fields).
  • Cardinality — Never use unbounded values as index/label keys (user_id, email, full URL, raw error text) in metrics/labels — they explode cardinality; keep them as event fields instead. Alert on symptoms (user-visible failure), not causes (one host's CPU).
  • Verify the telemetry itself — After instrumenting, induce the failure and confirm you can locate it from the logs/metrics alone. Untested observability tends to be silently wrong — e.g. sampling upstream of metric generation skews a request-rate metric by the sampling ratio while nothing looks broken.
  • Levels — Use consistently: ERROR (failures, exceptions), WARN (recoverable issues, deprecations), INFO (key business events, request summary), DEBUG (detailed flow; disable or sample in production).
  • Context — Include request_id, trace_id, or correlation_id when available. Include user_id, order_id, or similar only when safe and allowed by policy. Do not log full PII (email, phone, address) in plain text unless required and compliant.
  • No secrets — Never log passwords, tokens, API keys, or full card numbers. Redact or omit. For debugging, mask or show last 4 digits only where policy allows.
  • One place — Use the project's logging library (Winston, Pino, log4j, structlog, etc.) and output to the same pipeline (e.g. stdout) that the platform collects.

Work Process

  1. Check existing practice — What format does the project use (JSON, plain text)? What library? What levels? Match it.
  2. Choose level — error for failures; warn for recoverable or deprecated; info for key actions (request completed, order created); debug for detailed flow. Do not use info for verbose per-item logs in hot paths; use debug or sampled info.
  3. Add context — Request id, operation name, duration, status. Identifiers (user_id, order_id) only if policy allows. Structured fields, not interpolated into message string when the logger supports structured fields.
  4. Redact — No secrets; no full PII in message or fields. If you must log something sensitive for debugging, use redaction or sampling and document.
  5. Verify — Logs go to stdout or the configured sink; format is parseable; no secrets or PII in sample output.

What to Log

CategoryLevelContentDo not log
Request start/endINFOmethod, path, status, duration_ms, request_idBody, headers with tokens
ErrorsERRORmessage, error type, stack (server-side), request_idFull request/response, secrets
Recoverable issuesWARNmessage, context (e.g. retry count), request_id
Key business eventsINFOevent name, relevant ids (order_id, user_id if safe), outcomeFull payloads, PII
External callsINFO or DEBUGservice, operation, duration_ms, outcome (success/failure)Full request/response, credentials
Detailed flowDEBUGstep, state, idsSecrets, PII

Format (structured)

JSON (recommended for production):

{
  "timestamp": "2024-03-15T10:30:00.123Z",
  "level": "info",
  "message": "Request completed",
  "request_id": "abc-123",
  "method": "GET",
  "path": "/api/orders",
  "status": 200,
  "duration_ms": 45
}

Fields: Prefer consistent names (snake_case or camelCase per project). Put variable data in fields, not only in the message string, so logs are queryable.

Wide events (canonical log lines)

For request-driven services, prefer one context-rich structured event per request per service over scattered log lines:

  • Middleware creates the event and owns timing, status, and emission — emit in finally so failures still produce the event. Handlers only add business fields along the way.
  • Include environment fields in every event: commit hash, service version, region.
  • Capture business context, not just mechanics: "premium customer failed a $2,499 checkout" beats "checkout failed".
  • Scattered step-by-step lines stay at debug level; the wide event is the queryable record of what happened.

Good vs Bad

Good:

logger.info({ request_id, method, path, status, duration_ms }, 'Request completed');
logger.error({ err, request_id }, 'Payment failed');
logger.debug({ order_id, step: 'validation' }, 'Validating order');

Bad:

console.log('User ' + user.email + ' did something');  // PII in log
logger.info('Token: ' + token);  // Secret in log
logger.error('Error: ' + err);   // May include stack or internal detail in message; use structured field

Rules

  • Do not add logs that dump full request/response or env vars. Suggest redaction or sampling if needed for debugging.
  • If the project has a logging or privacy policy (retention, PII, secrets), align with it.
  • Use the same library and format as the rest of the codebase. Do not introduce a second logging system without good reason.

Checklist

  • Level appropriate (error/warn/info/debug)
  • Context included (request_id, operation, duration where relevant)
  • No secrets or full PII in message or fields
  • Structured format (fields) when logger supports it
  • Matches project library and format

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternBetter approach
Logging full request/responseLog method, path, status, duration; redact or omit body/headers
Using console.log in server codeUse project logger with levels and structure
Interpolating everything into messageUse structured fields (request_id, order_id, etc.)
Logging at info for every iteration in a loopUse debug or sample (e.g. every Nth)
Leftover print-debugging (print(), fmt.Println, console.log) in production pathsRemove, or convert to logger.debug with fields
"We'll redact later"Redact or omit from the start; do not log secrets

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.