Deploy npm
π¦Curated Cursor AI agent skills, slash commands, MCP configs, subagents & rules for full-stack dev β React 19, Next.js 15, Supabase, Tailwind v4, TypeScript
npx -y skills add kensaurus/cursor-kenji --skill deploy-npmAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Release npm packages end-to-end: Changesets version bump, CHANGELOG update, GitHub Actions OIDC publish, and post-release verification. Use when the user says "release to npm", "publish this package", "ship a new version", "cut a release", "update the changelog", or combines a package name with a release verb. Covers monorepo and single-package workflows. Pairs with deploy-verify, docs-writer. Do NOT use for non-npm deploys (Vercel, Docker) or internal release notes only.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the authorβs claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
14.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
deploy-npm β Full release workflow
This skill is opinionated for repos that use:
pnpm+turbomonorepo@changesets/cli+@changesets/actionfor versioning and changelog generation- A GitHub Actions workflow named
Release(.github/workflows/release.yml) that runschangeset version+changeset publishon push tomaster - npm Trusted Publisher (OIDC) with provenance β no long-lived
NPM_TOKEN step-security/harden-runnerblocking some runner writes (notably git tag refs)
Adapt the package / branch / workflow names if the target repo differs, but keep the phase order β every phase blocks on the previous one.
Quick Start
Copy this checklist into the conversation and tick boxes as you go:
Release progress:
- [ ] Phase 0: Discover repo state (branch, open PRs, pending changesets)
- [ ] Phase 1: Author / verify the changeset
- [ ] Phase 2: Green the feature PR
- [ ] Phase 3: Merge feature PR to master
- [ ] Phase 4: Wait for & green the changesets Version PR
- [ ] Phase 5: Merge Version PR β trigger publish
- [ ] Phase 6: Handle github-actions[bot] anti-loop if push trigger didn't fire
- [ ] Phase 7: Verify on npm (npm view) and on GitHub Releases
- [ ] Phase 8: Create per-package GitHub Release notes if harden-runner blocked tags
Phase 0 β Discover repo state
Before doing anything destructive, understand what's open:
cd <repo-root>
# Current branch + dirty state
git status --short
git log --oneline -5
# Open PRs
gh pr list --state open --json number,title,headRefName
# Pending changesets (anything not yet versioned)
ls .changeset/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v README
# Release workflow definition (so you know the trigger semantics)
cat .github/workflows/release.yml | head -80
Confirm with the user before continuing if:
- There are uncommitted local changes (
git statusis non-empty) - More than one feature PR is open and they conflict
- No changesets exist (
changeset publishwould be a no-op)
Phase 1 β Author / verify the changeset
A changeset is a markdown file under .changeset/ with a YAML preamble listing affected packages + bump type:
---
'@scope/web': minor
'@scope/cli': minor
'@scope/node': patch
---
One-paragraph summary of what users get.
## @scope/web
- Feature bullet 1
- Feature bullet 2
## @scope/cli
- ...
Bump rules (follow semver strictly):
majorβ breaking API changeminorβ additive feature, no breakagepatchβ bug fix only, no API surface change
Common mistake: leaving sibling packages out when their consumer was bumped. If @scope/react re-exports @scope/core and core got a feature, react typically needs at least a patch so users on the new core get a fresh react tarball.
Run pnpm changeset status (or npx changeset status) to preview the version graph before pushing.
Phase 2 β Green the feature PR
Push the branch, open the PR, then iterate on CI until every required check is green:
git push -u origin <branch>
gh pr create --title "..." --body "..."
# Poll status
gh pr checks <pr-number>
# Watch a specific failing job to its conclusion
gh run watch <run-id> --exit-status
Typical fix loops (be ready for these):
Build & Testfails on test β run the failing test locally:pnpm --filter <pkg> test; fix; commit; push.typecheckfails but tests pass β some helper type leaked. Look for inlineimport('...')type annotations and switch to namedimport type { X } from '...'(eslint rule@typescript-eslint/consistent-type-imports).lintfails onnext lintin any app on Next.js β₯ 15.5 βnext lintwas removed. Replace witheslint . --ext .ts,.tsxinpackage.jsonand addeslint+ the workspace eslint-config todevDependencies.lintfails on// eslint-disable-next-line unknown-ruleunder ESLint 10 β remove the directive. ESLint 10 treats unknown-rule disables as errors.Check bundle sizesfails β bump the limit in the package'ssize-limitconfig inpackage.json, but only after confirming the growth is from intentional new code (runpnpm --filter <pkg> exec size-limit --whylocally).- Docs build (Nextra) fails with Zod
expected nonoptional, received undefined β at childrenβ patchnextra-theme-docs/dist/schemas.jsto markchildren: reactNode.optional()inLayoutPropsSchema, register the patch in rootpackage.jsonpnpm.patchedDependencies. - MDX build error like "import statement after heading" β move every
import ... from '...'to the top of the MDX file, before headings or JSX.
CodeQL informational findings: The CodeQL (GitHub Advanced Security) summary check often shows alerts that pre-existed but get re-flagged because the PR is large. The CodeQL (javascript-typescript) workflow run itself is what actually gates merge. Don't conflate the two.
Phase 3 β Merge feature PR to master
gh pr merge <pr-number> --squash --admin --subject "release: <one-line summary>"
--admin is needed if the user has admin rights and a required status check is stuck (e.g., CodeQL alert summary showing failure when the actual scan workflow passed).
Immediately after merge, the Release workflow fires on push to master. Watch it:
sleep 10
gh run list --branch master --workflow Release --limit 1
gh run watch <run-id> --exit-status
This first run will either:
- Open the changesets "Version Packages" PR (most common β leaves your changes unpublished until you merge it), OR
- Publish directly (only if
changeset versionwas already run on the merged branch)
If you see a new PR titled chore: version packages from app/github-actions, continue to Phase 4.
Phase 4 β Wait for & green the changesets Version PR
gh pr list --state open --json number,title,headRefName --jq '.[] | select(.headRefName == "changeset-release/master")'
Critical gotcha: workflows triggered by github-actions[bot] commits are suppressed by GitHub's anti-loop protection. The Version PR will exist with mergeStateStatus: BLOCKED because required checks (e.g., Build & Test) never fired.
Trigger CI manually with an empty commit on the bot's branch:
git fetch origin changeset-release/master
git checkout changeset-release/master
git commit --allow-empty -m "chore: trigger CI for version packages PR"
git push origin changeset-release/master
git checkout - # back to your previous branch
sleep 10
gh run list --branch changeset-release/master --limit 3
gh run watch <new-run-id> --exit-status
Phase 5 β Merge Version PR β trigger publish
Once CI is green:
gh pr merge <version-pr-number> --squash --admin --subject "chore: version packages (release <month> <year>)"
Wait ~10 seconds, then check whether the Release workflow auto-fired:
sleep 10
gh run list --branch master --workflow Release --limit 2
Phase 6 β Handle the github-actions[bot] anti-loop
If the latest Release run timestamp on master is older than the Version PR merge time, the same anti-loop problem suppressed the publish trigger (squash-merge attributed to github-actions[bot] doesn't fire downstream workflows).
The published release.yml should declare workflow_dispatch: for exactly this case. Dispatch it manually:
gh workflow run Release --ref master
sleep 8
gh run list --workflow Release --branch master --limit 1
gh run watch <new-run-id> --exit-status
Watch for the "Version & Publish" job. Look in its log for either:
π¦ info publishing @scope/[email protected](success)π¦ warn @scope/pkg is not being published because version x.y.z is already published on npm(means an earlier run already shipped it β fine)404 Not Found - "<pkg>@<version>" is not in this registry(this is npm's misleading error for OIDC trusted-publisher mismatch, not a missing package β see "OIDC gotcha" below)
Phase 7 β Verify on npm + GitHub Releases
Confirm every package landed on the public registry:
for pkg in <space-separated-package-names>; do
echo -n "$pkg: "
npm view "$pkg" version dist-tags.latest 2>&1 | tr '\n' ' '
echo
done
Each line should print version = 'x.y.z' dist-tags.latest = 'x.y.z'.
Check GitHub Releases:
gh release list --limit 10
gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/releases/latest --jq '.tag_name,.name,.html_url'
The Latest badge should be on the new release. If it's on the wrong one:
gh release edit <correct-tag> --latest
Phase 8 β Manual GitHub Releases when harden-runner blocks tags
If step-security/harden-runner blocks the runner from writing .git/refs/tags/*.lock (you'll see [Source code overwritten] lines in the post-run log), changesets/action will fail to push tags, which means no GitHub Release pages are created even though npm publish succeeded.
Recover by creating tags + releases via the GitHub API targeting the current master SHA:
# Get the published master SHA from the Version PR's merge commit
MASTER_SHA=$(gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/commits/master --jq '.sha')
# Create each tag
for tag in "[email protected]" "@scope/[email protected]" "@scope/[email protected]" ...; do
gh api -X POST repos/<owner>/<repo>/git/refs \
-f ref="refs/tags/$tag" \
-f sha="$MASTER_SHA"
done
# Write the umbrella release notes once
cat > /tmp/release-notes.md <<'EOF'
## <Project> β <Month Year> release
[1-paragraph high-level summary]
## What's published to npm
| Package | New version |
|---------|-------------|
| `main-pkg` | `x.y.z` |
| `@scope/cli` | `x.y.z` |
...
## Highlights
### Feature group 1
- bullet
- bullet
[etc β pull straight from the changeset markdown]
## Migration notes
[breaking changes with diff blocks]
## Install
\`\`\`bash
npm install @scope/[email protected] @scope/[email protected]
\`\`\`
EOF
# Create the umbrella release (marked Latest)
gh release create "[email protected]" \
--title "<Project> β <Month Year> release (<3-word highlight>)" \
--notes-file /tmp/release-notes.md \
--latest --target master
# Create per-package release stubs that link back
for tag in "@scope/[email protected]" "@scope/[email protected]" ...; do
gh release create "$tag" --title "$tag" \
--notes "Part of the [<Project> <Month Year> release](https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/releases/tag/main-pkg%40x.y.z). See the umbrella release for full notes.
\`\`\`bash
npm install $tag
\`\`\`" \
--target master
done
# Clean up
rm /tmp/release-notes.md
Important: --latest only applies to the most recent gh release create / gh release edit invocation. After creating the per-package stubs, re-mark the umbrella as latest:
gh release edit "[email protected]" --latest
OIDC Trusted-Publisher gotchas
If changeset publish fails with 404 Not Found - "<pkg>@<version>" is not in this registry and your provenance config is on, the issue is almost always:
- Old npm CLI:
setup-node@v4withnode-version: 22ships npm 10, which has a broken OIDC handshake. Bumpnode-version: 24in the Release workflow β Node 24 ships npm 11.5+ with the fix. - Missing Trusted Publisher rule: every publishable package needs a rule on
npmjs.com β Package β Settings β Trusted Publisherspointing at exactly<owner>/<repo>/.github/workflows/release.ymlon branchmaster. - Branch mismatch: the workflow runs on
release/featurebut the Trusted Publisher rule pinsmaster. Either restrict workflow to master or add a rule per branch.
Anti-patterns to avoid
- Editing
.changeset/*.mdafterchangeset versionran β those files are deleted byversionand re-creating them won't re-bump. Make a new changeset for follow-up changes. - Force-pushing the changesets-release/master bot branch β the bot owns it and will overwrite next push to master. Empty commits are fine; rewrites are not.
- Manually editing
CHANGELOG.mdβ Changesets owns it. Edit the changeset markdown beforeversion, or write a follow-up changeset. - Publishing without
--adminto bypass CodeQL alert summary β only acceptable when the workflow CodeQL (javascript-typescript) actually passed and you've reviewed the alerts to confirm they're informational. Document the call in the umbrella release notes under "Known follow-ups". - Running
pnpm publishlocally β circumvents provenance, breaks Trusted Publisher chain. Always go through the workflow.
Verification commands (cheat sheet)
# Did npm get the new version?
npm view <pkg> version
# Is the umbrella GH release marked Latest?
gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/releases/latest --jq '.tag_name'
# Are all expected tags pushed?
git ls-remote --tags origin | grep -E '<pkg>@x\.y\.z'
# Did any workflow fail in the release window?
gh run list --branch master --created ">$(date -u -d '1 hour ago' +%FT%TZ)" --json conclusion,name | jq
# What did the Version & Publish step actually publish?
gh run view <run-id> --log | grep -E "π¦.*info publishing|warn.*already published"
When to deviate from this skill
- Repo doesn't use Changesets β use whatever it uses (
semantic-release, manualnpm version+ tag,release-please), but keep Phases 0/2/7 verbatim. - Repo publishes a single package, not a monorepo β skip Phase 8's per-package stubs.
- Repo doesn't use OIDC Trusted Publisher β drop the OIDC gotchas section, but never add a long-lived
NPM_TOKENwithout flagging the security trade-off to the user first.
When in doubt, prefer the workflow-dispatch path (Phase 6) over re-merging or rewriting history β workflow_dispatch is idempotent for changeset publish (already-published versions become warnings, not errors).
Reference implementation: For an annotated example of this workflow applied to a real monorepo (Changesets + OIDC + per-package GitHub Releases), see
references/example-mushi-mushi.md.