Geo proposal
Skill kennyolofsson23-netizen/claude-code-config/skills/geo-proposal
The most comprehensive Claude Code setup — 29 skills, 9 plugins, 13 hooks, 8 agents, 8 commands. Self-documenting, self-improving, CLI-first. Includes self-interview prompt for personalization.
npx -y skills add kennyolofsson23-netizen/claude-code-config --skill geo-proposalAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Auto-generate a professional, client-ready GEO service proposal from audit data. Creates a full proposal in markdown and PDF including executive summary, findings, recommended service packages (Basic/Standard/Premium), pricing, timeline, and terms. Use when user says "proposal", "proposta", "offerta", "preventivo", "generate proposal", or after completing a GEO audit for a prospect.
SKILL.md
11.7 KB, ~2.8k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
GEO Proposal Generator
Purpose
Generate a fully customized, client-ready GEO service proposal that:
- Pulls findings directly from the prospect's GEO audit
- Translates technical gaps into business pain points
- Presents 3 service tiers with clear pricing
- Includes a realistic ROI projection
- Outputs a professional markdown document ready to send
Command
/geo proposal <domain-or-audit-file> [--tier basic|standard|premium] [--client-name "Name"] [--monthly EUR]
Examples:
/geo proposal electron-srl.com
/geo proposal electron-srl.com --tier standard --client-name "Electron Srl"
/geo proposal ~/.geo-prospects/audits/electron-srl.com-2026-03-12.md
Workflow
Step 1: Load Audit Data
- Check if
~/.geo-prospects/audits/<domain>*.mdexists - If not, suggest running
/geo quick <domain>first - Extract from audit:
- GEO Score (overall and per-category)
- Top 3 critical findings
- Quick wins list
- Business type
- Estimated organic traffic impact
Step 2: Customize the Proposal
Auto-fill proposal template with:
- Company name (from domain or prospect record)
- GEO score and tier label
- 3 most critical pain points (translated to business language)
- Estimated revenue at risk from AI search shift
- Recommended service tier based on score:
- Score 0-40 → Recommend Premium (critical issues need full attention)
- Score 41-60 → Recommend Standard (significant gaps, needs monthly work)
- Score 61-75 → Recommend Basic (solid base, needs monitoring)
Step 3: Generate Proposal File
Output to ~/.geo-prospects/proposals/<domain>-proposal-<date>.md
Also update prospect record if it exists in ~/.geo-prospects/prospects.json
Proposal Template
Generate the following document, filling all [PLACEHOLDERS] with real audit data:
# GEO Optimization Proposal
## [COMPANY NAME] — AI Search Visibility
**Prepared by:** [YOUR AGENCY NAME]
**Prepared for:** [CONTACT NAME], [COMPANY NAME]
**Date:** [DATE]
**Valid until:** [DATE + 30 DAYS]
**Reference:** GEO-PROP-[YYMMDD]-[DOMAIN]
---
## Executive Summary
[COMPANY NAME] operates in [INDUSTRY] and serves customers across [GEOGRAPHY].
Our GEO audit of [DOMAIN], conducted on [DATE], reveals a GEO Readiness Score
of **[SCORE]/100 ([TIER LABEL])**.
This means your website currently has [TIER DESCRIPTION — use score interpretation table].
As AI-powered search (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity) now influences
**[X]% of online discovery** and is growing at 527% year-over-year, this gap
represents a measurable risk to your pipeline.
The three most urgent issues are:
1. **[CRITICAL FINDING 1]** — [Business impact in one sentence]
2. **[CRITICAL FINDING 2]** — [Business impact in one sentence]
3. **[CRITICAL FINDING 3]** — [Business impact in one sentence]
We recommend the **[TIER NAME] package** at **€[PRICE]/month**, which addresses
all critical issues within 90 days and positions [COMPANY] as an AI-visible
authority in [INDUSTRY].
---
## The Opportunity: Why GEO Matters for [COMPANY NAME]
### The AI Search Shift Is Already Happening
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| AI-referred traffic growth (2025) | +527% YoY |
| AI traffic conversion vs. organic | 4.4x higher |
| ChatGPT weekly active users | 900M+ |
| Google AI Overviews monthly reach | 1.5B users, 200+ countries |
| Gartner: traditional search traffic drop by 2028 | -50% |
| Marketers investing in GEO today | Only 23% |
**First-mover advantage is real.** Companies that invest in GEO now will
capture the AI search channel before competitors do.
### Your Current Position
| Metric | [COMPANY] | Industry Average | Top Performers |
|--------|-----------|------------------|----------------|
| GEO Score | [SCORE]/100 | 45/100 | 75+/100 |
| AI Crawlers Allowed | [X]/14 | 8/14 | 14/14 |
| Brand Mentions (AI platforms) | [STATUS] | Moderate | High |
| Schema Coverage | [STATUS] | Partial | Complete |
| llms.txt | [Yes/No] | 12% have it | 78% have it |
---
## Audit Findings Summary
### GEO Score Breakdown
| Category | Your Score | Weight | Weighted | Priority |
|----------|-----------|--------|---------|----------|
| AI Citability & Visibility | [SCORE]/100 | 25% | [WEIGHTED] | [HIGH/MED/LOW] |
| Brand Authority Signals | [SCORE]/100 | 20% | [WEIGHTED] | [HIGH/MED/LOW] |
| Content Quality & E-E-A-T | [SCORE]/100 | 20% | [WEIGHTED] | [HIGH/MED/LOW] |
| Technical Foundations | [SCORE]/100 | 15% | [WEIGHTED] | [HIGH/MED/LOW] |
| Structured Data | [SCORE]/100 | 10% | [WEIGHTED] | [HIGH/MED/LOW] |
| Platform Optimization | [SCORE]/100 | 10% | [WEIGHTED] | [HIGH/MED/LOW] |
| **TOTAL GEO SCORE** | | | **[SCORE]/100** | **[TIER]** |
### Critical Issues Found
[For each critical issue from audit:]
#### 🔴 [ISSUE TITLE]
**What we found:** [Technical finding in plain language]
**Business impact:** [What this means for their revenue/visibility]
**Our fix:** [What we will do to resolve it]
**Timeline:** [When they will see improvement]
---
## Our Solution: Service Packages
We offer three engagement models based on the scope of optimization needed.
---
### BASIC — €2,500/month
*Best for: Sites with score 61-75 needing targeted improvements*
**What's included:**
- Quarterly full GEO audit (4x/year)
- Quarterly client report with score tracking
- Schema.org implementation (Organization + key page schemas)
- AI crawler access optimization (robots.txt)
- llms.txt creation and maintenance
- Email support (48-hour response)
**Estimated GEO score improvement:** +10-20 points in 6 months
**Contract:** Minimum 6 months
---
### STANDARD — €5,000/month ⭐ Recommended for [COMPANY]
*Best for: Sites with score 40-60 needing structured monthly work*
**Everything in Basic, plus:**
- Monthly full GEO audit + delta report
- Monthly strategy call (60 minutes)
- Content citability optimization (up to 10 pages/month)
- Brand authority building (Wikipedia, Wikidata, LinkedIn optimization)
- Platform-specific optimization (Google AIO, ChatGPT, Perplexity)
- E-E-A-T improvements (author pages, credentials, freshness signals)
- Slack channel for fast communication (24-hour response)
**Estimated GEO score improvement:** +25-40 points in 6 months
**Contract:** Minimum 6 months
---
### PREMIUM — €9,500/month
*Best for: Sites with score 0-40 with critical issues, or competitive industries*
**Everything in Standard, plus:**
- Bi-weekly strategy calls
- Technical SEO implementation support (Core Web Vitals, SSR, speed)
- Full content strategy + production (4 optimized articles/month)
- Active brand building (Reddit, YouTube, industry citations)
- Competitor monitoring and response
- Dedicated account manager
- Priority support (4-hour response)
**Estimated GEO score improvement:** +40-60 points in 6 months
**Contract:** Minimum 12 months
---
## ROI Projection for [COMPANY NAME]
Based on your current GEO score of [SCORE]/100 and industry benchmarks:
| Scenario | 6-Month Score | AI Traffic Increase | Est. Additional Value/Month |
|----------|--------------|--------------------|-----------------------------|
| No action | [SCORE + 2]/100 | +5% (organic growth) | €[LOW] |
| Basic package | [SCORE + 15]/100 | +30-40% | €[MED] |
| Standard package | [SCORE + 32]/100 | +60-90% | €[HIGH] |
| Premium package | [SCORE + 50]/100 | +100-150% | €[VERY HIGH] |
**Assumptions:**
- Based on estimated [X] monthly organic visitors to [DOMAIN]
- AI search is projected to drive 25-40% of organic discovery by end of 2026
- AI-referred traffic converts at 4.4x the rate of regular organic traffic
- Calculations use conservative estimates — actual results may vary
**Payback period (Standard package):** [X] months based on current traffic
---
## Engagement Timeline
### Month 1 — Foundation
- Kick-off call and onboarding (Week 1)
- Full technical audit + baseline metrics capture
- Quick wins implementation: robots.txt, schema, llms.txt, meta descriptions
- Expected score improvement: +5-10 points
### Month 2-3 — Optimization
- Content citability rewrites (top 10 pages)
- E-E-A-T improvements: author pages, credentials, dates
- Platform-specific optimization (Google AIO, ChatGPT, Perplexity)
- Brand presence: LinkedIn, Wikipedia/Wikidata groundwork
- Expected score improvement: +15-25 points cumulative
### Month 4-6 — Authority Building
- Brand mention campaigns (Reddit, industry sites, YouTube)
- Topical authority content strategy
- Monthly reports showing score improvements
- Expected score improvement: +30-45 points cumulative
### Month 6 — Review
- Full re-audit with before/after comparison
- ROI report
- Renewal discussion
---
## Why Us
- **GEO specialists**: We focus exclusively on AI search optimization, not traditional SEO agencies adapting to GEO
- **Transparent reporting**: Monthly reports show exactly what changed and why
- **No lock-in beyond minimum**: Month-to-month after initial commitment
- **Proven methodology**: 11-dimension GEO audit covering all major AI platforms
- **Fast results**: Quick wins visible within 30 days
---
## Investment Summary
| Package | Monthly | 6-Month | 12-Month |
|---------|---------|---------|----------|
| Basic | €2,500 | €15,000 | €30,000 |
| Standard | €5,000 | €30,000 | €60,000 |
| Premium | €9,500 | €57,000 | €114,000 |
*All prices exclude VAT. Payment terms: monthly, due within 15 days of invoice.*
---
## Next Steps
To move forward:
1. **Review this proposal** and share any questions
2. **Schedule a 30-minute call** to walk through findings together: [CALENDAR LINK]
3. **Sign the service agreement** (sent separately upon acceptance)
4. **Kick-off call** scheduled for your chosen start date
This proposal is valid for **30 days** from the date above.
---
## Terms & Conditions
- **Minimum commitment:** As stated per package above
- **Cancellation:** 30-day written notice after minimum term
- **Confidentiality:** All audit findings and client data are strictly confidential
- **Results:** We guarantee effort and methodology, not specific ranking outcomes
- **Reporting:** Monthly reports delivered by the 5th of each month
- **Access needed:** Read access to Google Analytics / Search Console (if available)
---
*This proposal was prepared using GEO-SEO analysis tools and reflects findings
from the audit of [DOMAIN] conducted on [DATE]. All scores and recommendations
are based on current industry best practices for Generative Engine Optimization.*
Output
- Save proposal to
~/.geo-prospects/proposals/<domain>-proposal-<date>.md - Update prospect record: set
statustoproposal, saveproposal_filepath - Print confirmation:
✓ Proposal generated: ~/.geo-prospects/proposals/electron-srl.com-proposal-2026-03-12.md ✓ Prospect status updated: Qualified → Proposal ✓ Recommended package: STANDARD (€5,000/month) — Score 32/100 Next: Share the proposal file or run `/geo report-pdf` for a visual version.
Pricing Recommendation Logic
Base recommendation on GEO score:
- Score 0-40 → Recommend Premium (critical issues require intensive work)
- Score 41-60 → Recommend Standard (structured monthly optimization)
- Score 61-75 → Recommend Basic (maintenance + targeted improvements)
- Score 76+ → Offer Basic or quarterly retainer check-in
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most plan spec skills give in ~2.8k tokens
Counted across 1,100 of the 1,860 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- ask one question at a timein 46 of 1100, across 38 files
- Break plans into vertical slicesin 28 of 1100, across 10 files
- Publish issues in dependency orderin 27 of 1100, across 9 files
- Iterate until user approves the breakdownin 24 of 1100, across 6 files
- Explore the repository to understand the codebase statein 24 of 1100, across 7 files
- Use domain glossary vocabularyin 23 of 1100, across 5 files
- Apply correct triage labels to published issuesin 23 of 1100, across 5 files
- Write failing tests before implementation codein 23 of 1100, across 18 files
- Prefer AFK slices over HITLin 22 of 1100, across 7 files
- ask clarifying questions until requirements are concretein 21 of 1100, across 13 files
- Respect existing architecture decision recordsin 20 of 1100, across 5 files
- write a specification before writing any codein 20 of 1100, across 12 files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.