Tdd http first
Claude Code skills marketplace — backend & frontend engineering conventions + step-by-step third-party integration recipes: Stripe, Rapyd, CyberSource, UOB & wallet payments, Singpass/Keycloak OIDC & 3-D Secure, Twilio SMS, Docker & CI/CD. NestJS/TypeScript + React, language-flexible.
npx -y skills add kennguyen887/agent-foundation --skill tdd-http-firstAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Drive a feature/bugfix test-first when the project mandates HTTP-layer-only testing — the failing RED test must be an HTTP/route-harness test (e.g. supertest), never a service/validator/util unit test. Trigger phrases — "làm theo TDD", "viết test fail trước", "write the failing test first", "do this test-first" — in any repo whose rules forbid unit tests.
SKILL.md
5.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
When to use
You are about to implement or change endpoint behavior — a new route, a new request/response field, new validation, or a bugfix on an existing route — and you want to drive it test-first (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR), in a project whose testing rule is HTTP-layer-only (see the global ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md "HTTP-layer testing rule": every test for an HTTP service goes through the HTTP layer via supertest / the project's route harness; no tests/services|validators|utils unit tests that bypass the route).
This skill exists because of a collision: the generic test-driven loop's reflex is "write a failing unit test first," but the HTTP-layer-only rule forbids exactly that. So here, RED = a failing HTTP-layer test. A fresh assistant doing "TDD" will reach for a unit test and violate the rule — that is the mistake this skill prevents.
Division of labor:
- The loop discipline itself (one behavior at a time, watch it fail for the right reason, write the minimal code to go green, then refactor) → the standard TDD RED/GREEN/REFACTOR discipline. Apply it; this skill doesn't restate it.
- Binding that loop to the HTTP-layer-only rule (where the RED test lives, what counts as a real RED, the escape hatch) → this skill.
Steps
-
(RED) Write one failing HTTP-layer test. Decide WHERE it goes first: add to the existing test file for that route/area (a new
describe(...)block); create a new file only when none builds that router/area. Use the project's route harness. Worked example (listings-api —buildTestApp+ auto-mockedrepos; follow the repo'sauthor-lean-http-testsskill for placement):import { jest } from "@jest/globals"; import supertest from "supertest"; import { buildTestApp, repos, src } from "../../helpers/infrastructure.js"; // Mock external collaborators BEFORE importing the router (ESM hoist gotcha): // jest.unstable_mockModule(...) must run before the dynamic import below. const { default: SomeRouter } = await import("../../../src/app/http/routes/SomeRouter.js"); let app; beforeAll(async () => { app = await buildTestApp(SomeRouter, { userId: "1", companyId: "company-1" }); }); beforeEach(() => { jest.clearAllMocks(); }); test("returns the new zipCode field", async () => { repos.Lease.findById.mockResolvedValue(makeLease({ zip_code: "50010" })); const res = await supertest(app).get("/api/v1/leases/lease-1"); expect(res.status).toBe(200); expect(res.body.data.zipCode).toBe("50010"); // the contract you're driving });- Set per-case return values on the mocked repos; mock external services (S3, DocuSign, auth, etc.) explicitly above the router import — they are not auto-mocked.
- Use whichever test fn the linter allows (listings-api whitelists
test/describe, notit).
-
Run it and confirm it fails for the RIGHT reason. A test written before the route exists 404s — a false RED (fails on routing, not your behavior). Assert the concrete contract (
res.body.data.<field>, a 400 validation body, a status) so it still bites after the route is wired. If you only assertstatuson a brand-new route, also assert a body field so GREEN is real. -
(GREEN) Write the minimal implementation to make that one assertion pass (schema field, ViewModel mapping, validation rule, controller logic). Re-run — see it pass.
-
(REFACTOR) Clean up with the test green. Repeat from step 1 for the next behavior (happy path, then error/validation path — critical flows need both).
-
Escape hatch — do NOT fall back to a unit test. If a behavior genuinely cannot be reached through HTTP (logic inside a mocked service/validator the route never executes), then per the HTTP-layer-only rule you skip the test entirely. "Untestable through HTTP" means "untested", not "unit-tested as a workaround". Writing a
tests/services|validatorstest to get a RED is the exact anti-pattern this skill forbids — restructure so the behavior is reachable via the route, or leave it untested.
Verification
Run the single file (RED first, then GREEN after implementing). In listings-api:
NODE_OPTIONS=--experimental-vm-modules npx jest --runInBand tests/app/http/<name>.test.js
- RED is valid only when the first run fails on your assertion (e.g.
expected "50010", received undefined) — NOT on a 404, an import error, or a missing mock. If it fails for a plumbing reason, fix the test setup until it fails on the contract. - GREEN: same command passes after the minimal implementation.
- Lint clean on the changed files.
Related
- The generic TDD RED/GREEN/REFACTOR loop this adapts — apply that discipline, then layer on these constraints. The standard loop defaults to unit tests; this skill overrides that wherever HTTP-layer-only testing is mandated.
- Global
~/.claude/CLAUDE.md→ "HTTP-layer testing rule" — the authoritative no-unit-tests rule this operationalizes. - In listings-api: the
author-lean-http-testsproject skill (WHERE the test goes + HOW MANY cases) andadd-flag-gated-endpoint-group(fullerbuildTestAppharness reference).