Bib validate
Cross-reference \cite{} keys against .bib files or embedded \bibitem entries. Finds missing, unused, and typo'd citation keys. Deep verification mode spawns parallel agents for DOI/metadata validation at scale. Fix mode auto-adds missing entries to Paperpile.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add kenantang/codex-and-claude-skills --skill bib-validateAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
13.9 KB, ~3.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Bibliography Validation
LIBRARY-FIRST RULE: ALWAYS cross-reference cited keys against Paperpile (paperpile search-library) during validation. This catches drift between the .bib file and the reference manager. See the Reference Manager Cross-Reference section.
Citation key rule: Existing keys in the project always take precedence. They come from the user's reference management system and are canonical. When suggesting replacements (typo corrections, preprint upgrades, metadata fixes), always keep the user's key and update the .bib entry metadata around it — never suggest renaming a key to match some "standard" format.
When to Use
- Before compiling a final version of a paper
- After adding new citations to check nothing was missed
- When
biber/bibtexreports undefined citations - As part of a pre-submission checklist (pair with
/proofread)
When NOT to Use
- Finding new references — use
/literaturefor discovery - Building a bibliography from scratch — use
/literaturewith.bibgeneration - General proofreading — use
/proofread(which also flags citation format issues)
Phase 0: Session Log (Suggested)
Bibliography validation with preprint staleness checks can be context-heavy (OpenAlex lookups, web searches for published versions). Before starting, suggest running /session-log to capture prior work as a recovery checkpoint. If the user declines, proceed without it.
Convention
Default bibliography file is references.bib — this is the standard across all projects (per the /latex skill convention). However, the skill also supports:
- Any
.bibfile found in the same directory as the.texfiles being audited - Embedded bibliographies using
\begin{thebibliography}/\bibitem{key}blocks - Both external and embedded simultaneously (rare but possible)
Bibliography Detection
At the start of validation, detect which bibliography method the project uses:
1. External .bib file (standard)
Look for .bib files in the project directory. Priority order:
references.bib(preferred — standard naming convention across all projects)- Any other
.bibfile in the same directory as the.texfiles
If multiple .bib files are found, validate all of them and produce a combined report. Note which file each issue belongs to. If a legacy-named .bib file (e.g., paperpile.bib) exists alongside references.bib, flag it as a potential cleanup opportunity (the project may have migrated from Paperpile).
Full validation applies: cross-reference checks and quality checks.
2. Embedded \begin{thebibliography} / \bibitem{key}
Some LaTeX documents define references inline rather than using an external .bib file. Detect by scanning .tex files for \begin{thebibliography}.
Extract keys from \bibitem entries:
\bibitem{key}— standard form, key is the argument in braces\bibitem[label]{key}— optional label form (e.g.,\bibitem[Smith et al., 2020]{smith2020}), key is in the second set of braces
Only cross-reference checks apply (missing keys, unused keys, typos). Quality checks (required fields, year, author formatting) are skipped because embedded bibliographies don't have structured metadata.
3. Both (rare)
If a project has both a .bib file and \begin{thebibliography} blocks, validate both:
- Run full validation on the
.bibfile - Run cross-reference checks on
\bibitementries - Merge both key sets when checking for missing citations
Workflow
- Find files: Locate all
.texfiles in the project - Detect bibliography type: Check for
.bibfiles and/or\begin{thebibliography}blocks - Extract citation keys from .tex: Scan for all citation commands
- Extract entry keys from bibliography source(s):
- External: Parse all
@type{key,entries from.bibfile(s) - Embedded: Parse all
\bibitem{key}and\bibitem[label]{key}entries
- External: Parse all
- Cross-reference: Compare the two sets
- Quality checks: Validate
.bibentry completeness (external only) - Produce report: Write results to stdout (or save if requested)
Citation Commands to Scan
Scan .tex files for all of these patterns:
| Command | Example |
|---|---|
\cite{key} | Basic citation |
\citet{key} | Textual: Author (Year) |
\citep{key} | Parenthetical: (Author, Year) |
\textcite{key} | biblatex textual |
\autocite{key} | biblatex auto |
\parencite{key} | biblatex parenthetical |
\citeauthor{key} | Author name only |
\citeyear{key} | Year only |
\nocite{key} | Include in bibliography without in-text citation |
Also handle multi-key citations: \citep{key1, key2, key3}
Cross-Reference Checks
Critical: Missing Entries
Citation keys used in .tex but not defined in the bibliography source (.bib file or \bibitem entries).
These will cause compilation errors.
Warning: Unused Entries
Keys defined in the bibliography source but never cited in any .tex file.
Not errors, but may indicate:
- Forgotten citations (should they be
\nocite?) - Leftover entries from earlier drafts
- Entries intended for a different paper
Warning: Possible Typos (Fuzzy Match)
For each missing key, check if a similar key exists in the bibliography using edit distance:
- Edit distance = 1: Very likely a typo
- Edit distance = 2: Possibly a typo
- Flag these with the suggested correction
Common typo patterns:
- Year off by one:
smith2020vssmith2021 - Missing/extra letter:
santannavssant'annavssantana - Underscore vs camelCase:
smith_jonesvssmithjones
Reference Manager Cross-Reference
After the disk-based cross-reference, check each cited key against Paperpile. Produces a status table (HEALTHY / DRIFT / EXPORT_GAP / MISSING).
Full steps, MCP calls, and status categories: references/ref-manager-crossref.md
Quality Checks on .bib Entries
These checks apply only to external .bib files. Embedded bibliographies lack structured metadata, so quality checks are skipped for them.
Required Fields by Entry Type
| Entry Type | Required Fields |
|---|---|
@article | author, title, journal, year |
@book | author/editor, title, publisher, year |
@incollection | author, title, booktitle, publisher, year |
@inproceedings | author, title, booktitle, year |
@techreport | author, title, institution, year |
@unpublished | author, title, note, year |
@phdthesis | author, title, school, year |
Year Reasonableness
- Flag entries with year < 1900 or year > current year + 1
- Flag entries with no year at all
Author Formatting
- Check for inconsistent author formats within the file
- Flag entries where author field contains "and others" or "et al." — this is never valid in BibTeX. All authors must be listed explicitly. Severity: Warning.
- Flag entries with organisation names that might need
{{braces}}to prevent splitting
DOI Resolution (optional — triggered by --verify-dois flag or when issues are suspected)
Preferred method: scholarly scholarly-verify-dois. Collect all DOIs from the .bib file and run the CLI (up to 50 per call):
scholarly scholarly-verify-dois --dois DOI1,DOI2,DOI3 --json
This batch-verifies each DOI against all enabled sources (OpenAlex, Scopus, WoS). Results:
- VERIFIED (2+ sources confirm) — DOI is valid, metadata can be trusted
- SINGLE_SOURCE (1 source only) — DOI exists but warrants a manual spot-check
- NOT_FOUND — DOI not found in any source; resolve manually via WebFetch
Fallback for NOT_FOUND DOIs: Resolve via https://doi.org/[DOI] and confirm the returned metadata matches the entry:
- Title match: Does the DOI landing page title match the
.bibtitle? - Author match: Does the first author on the landing page match the
.bibfirst author? - Journal match: Does the venue match?
Flag mismatches as:
- Warning: DOI mismatch — DOI resolves to a different paper than claimed. This usually means the DOI is wrong (adjacent DOI in the same journal volume) or the authors are wrong (conflation of researchers in the same subfield).
This check catches:
- Wrong DOIs (e.g., off-by-one in the DOI suffix)
- Author conflation (real researchers incorrectly attributed to a paper)
- Metadata copied from secondary sources without verification
For manual WebFetch resolution, process in batches of 5 to avoid rate limiting. Only flag confirmed mismatches — if the DOI cannot be resolved (404, timeout), note it as "unresolvable" at Info level.
Preprint Staleness Check
For every entry that looks like a preprint, check whether a peer-reviewed version has since been published. Full detection signals, lookup protocol, and classification: references/preprint-check.md
Severity Levels
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Critical | Missing entry for a cited key — will cause compilation error |
| Warning | Unused entry, possible typo, missing required field |
| Info | Year oddity, formatting suggestion, bibliography type note |
Bibliography Output
After validation, offer these actions if applicable:
- Embedded bibliography → offer to create
references.bib: If the project uses\begin{thebibliography}, offer to extract the references into a properreferences.bibfile (one@miscentry per\bibitem, with the full text as anotefield). The author can then enrich the entries with proper metadata. - Non-standard
.bibname → offer to rename: If the existing.bibfile is not namedreferences.bib, offer to rename it toreferences.biband update the\bibliography{}command in the.texfile.
These are offers only — do not make changes without explicit confirmation.
Report Format
Full report template with all sections: references/report-template.md
Sections: Summary table → Critical (missing entries) → Warning (typos, unused, missing fields, DOI mismatches, stale preprints) → Info (year issues) → Limitations (for embedded bibliographies).
Optional: Metadata Verification
When missing entries or suspicious metadata are flagged, check these sources in order:
- Paperpile — call
paperpile search-libraryby title. If found, usepaperpile export-bibto get correct BibTeX. scholarlyCLI (multi-source scholarly search — shells out, works in main context AND sub-agents):scholarly scholarly-search "<title>" --json— search by title across OpenAlex + S2 + Scopus + WoSscholarly scholarly-verify-dois --dois D1,D2,... --json— batch-verify DOIs across all sources (preferred over manual DOI resolution)scholarly scholarly-paper-detail <paper_id> --json— get full metadata including pre-formatted BibTeX (via S2citationStyles), TLDR summary, and open access PDF link. Use for auto-generating BibTeX entries for missing references.scholarly scholarly-citations <paper_id> --json/scholarly scholarly-references <paper_id> --json— check citation context (how many papers cite this? what does it cite?) to assess relevance when deciding whether to keep or drop questionable entriesscholarly openalex-lookup-doi <doi> --json— look up full metadata for a specific DOI
For Python client fallback (citation networks, institution analysis): references/openalex-verification.md
Deep Verification Mode (Parallel, Disk-Based)
Triggered by: --deep-verify flag, 40+ entries, or "deep verify" / "verify all references". Spawns parallel sub-agents that verify batches and write results to disk. Full architecture, batch JSON format, and assembly: references/deep-verify.md
Council Mode (Optional)
For high-stakes submissions. Trigger: "council bib-validate", "thorough bib check". Full details: references/council-mode.md
Fix Mode
After producing the validation report, automatically fix resolvable issues (DRIFT → stage as BibTeX for Paperpile import, MISSING → search + add, MIGRATE → auto-add, metadata → correct BibTeX).
Full auto-fix actions, post-fix maintenance, and skip conditions: references/fix-mode.md
Quality Scoring
When producing a full validation report, apply numeric quality scoring using the shared framework:
- Framework:
../shared/quality-scoring.md— severity tiers, thresholds, verdict rules
Map validation findings to the framework tiers:
- Critical (-15 to -25): Missing entry for a cited key (compilation error)
- Major (-5 to -14): DOI mismatch, stale preprint with published version available, "et al." in author field
- Minor (-1 to -4): Missing optional fields, year oddities, unused entries
Compute the score and include the Score Block in the report after the summary table.
Cross-References
/proofread— For overall paper quality including citation format/literature— For finding and adding new references (includes full OpenAlex workflows)/bib-coverage— Compare project.bibvs Paperpile label — find uncited papers and unfiled references/latex— For compilation with reference checking/latex— For compilation and error resolution. Run after fixing bibliography issues to verify citations compile cleanly.shared/reference-resolution.md— Canonical lookup + filing sequence used by Ref Manager Cross-Reference and Fix Mode
What ships with it: 8 files
15.9 KB alongside SKILL.md
references/
- cli-recipes.md2.3 KB
- council-mode.md1.3 KB
- deep-verify.md3.1 KB
- fix-mode.md1.4 KB
- openalex-verification.md1.8 KB
- preprint-check.md1.9 KB
- ref-manager-crossref.md1.6 KB
- report-template.md2.4 KB