Beamer deck
Generated by Codex. Read with caution.
npx -y skills add kenantang/codex-and-claude-skills --skill beamer-deckAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when you need to create an academic Beamer presentation with original theme and multi-agent review.
SKILL.md
11.1 KB, ~2.6k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Beamer Deck Skill
Generate academic Beamer presentations with original themes, rhetoric-driven structure, and multi-agent review. Internalises Scott Cunningham's rhetoric framework and implements an adversarial review workflow.
Purpose
Create polished, zero-warning Beamer decks for academic contexts: seminars, conference talks, teaching lectures, and working decks for coauthors. Every deck gets a custom theme, assertion-driven titles, and parallel review by rhetoric and graphics sub-agents.
NOT for project status updates — use /project-deck for those.
When to Use
- Academic seminar presentations
- Conference talks (15–45 min)
- Teaching lectures (undergraduate or PhD)
- Working decks for coauthors or supervisors
- Any presentation that needs rhetoric discipline and visual quality
Critical Rules
- Build artifacts go to
out/, PDF stays in the source directory. Create.latexmkrcwith$out_dir = 'out'and anEND {}block to copy the PDF back if missing. Use/latexfor compilation — it handles error resolution automatically. See/latexfor manual config details. - Python: Always use
uv run python. Never barepython,python3,pip, orpip3. - Fix ALL warnings. Overfull hbox, underfull hbox, overfull vbox, underfull vbox — no matter how small. Parse the
.logfile. Recompile until clean. - Titles are assertions, not labels. "Distance increases abortion rates" — not "Results". Every frame title states a claim.
- One idea per slide. Not a guideline. A law. If a slide has two ideas, split it.
- Use the unified template. Always use
\usepackage[<institution>]{user-beamer}fromtemplates/beamer/. Options:warwick,southampton,bath,lse,plain. Never use default Beamer themes (Warsaw, Madrid, etc.) as-is, and never create one-off preambles. See [templates/beamer/README.md] for available custom commands and how to add institutions. - Code-first figures. Generate figures via R or Python scripts before inserting. Never use placeholder images. Always save the script alongside the figures — never generate a figure without preserving the code that created it.
- If a
.bibfile is used, validate it. Cross-reference all\cite{}keys against the bibliography file. See/bib-validatefor the full protocol.
Rhetoric Principles
Full framework (Three Laws, MB/MC, Aristotelian Triad, Narrative Arc, Pyramid Principle, Devil's Advocate): ../shared/rhetoric-principles.md
Scott's original essay: resources/academics/scott-cunningham/MixtapeTools/presentations/rhetoric_of_decks.md
Quality Scoring
Apply numeric quality scoring using the shared framework and skill-specific rubric:
- Framework:
../shared/quality-scoring.md— severity tiers, thresholds, verdict rules - Rubric:
references/quality-rubric.md— issue-to-deduction mappings for this skill
Start at 100, deduct per issue found, apply verdict. Compute the score in Phase 7 and report it in the final output.
Context-Specific Guidance
See ../shared/rhetoric-principles.md for the full Aristotelian Triad framework. Context-specific Ethos/Pathos/Logos balance and adjustments are applied in Phase 2 based on audience type (academic seminar, conference talk, teaching lecture, working deck).
Workflow: 7 Phases
You (orchestrator)
├── Phase 1: Gather context (direct)
├── Phase 2: Design structure (direct)
├── Phase 3: Build deck (direct)
├── Phase 4: Fix all warnings (direct)
├── Phase 5: Rhetoric review (sub-agent — Explore)
├── Phase 6: Graphics review (sub-agent — Explore) ← parallel with Phase 5
└── Phase 7: Apply & finalise (direct)
Phase 1: Gather Context (Direct)
Read project files, content sources, and audience brief. Ask the user clarifying questions:
- Audience: Who is this for? (seminar, conference, teaching, coauthors)
- Duration: How long is the talk?
- Content source: Paper draft? Notes? Existing slides? Code output?
- Special requirements: Specific figures, institutional branding, language?
Check for existing .bib files in the project. If citations are needed, note this for Phase 3.
Phase 2: Design Structure (Direct)
- Choose rhetoric balance based on audience (see table above)
- Outline slide sequence with assertion titles — write each title as a claim
- Plan narrative arc — consult
docs/reference/talk-design.mdfor format-specific arcs (empirical, structural, theory, descriptive) and audience calibration - Choose institution option for
user-beamer— colours and fonts are set by the template - Identify figures needed — which need to be generated via code?
Present the outline to the user for approval before building.
Phase 3: Build Deck (Direct)
- Generate figures first — run R/Python scripts, save to
figures/ - Write
.texfile using the unified template:\documentclass[aspectratio=169,11pt]{beamer}+\usepackage[warwick]{user-beamer}(or other institution option). Use\fbinstituteand\fbemailfor metadata. Custom commands:\contribcard,\phasecircle,\accentbox,\highlightbox,standoutframeenvironment. - Use 16:9 aspect ratio (already in the documentclass above)
- Create
.latexmkrcif not present ($out_dir = 'out'+END {}block to copy PDF back) - Compile using
/latex— this handles missing packages, font conflicts, citation key mismatches, and stale cache automatically - If using citations: add
\addbibresource{references.bib}or\bibliography{}as appropriate
Phase 4: Fix All Warnings (Direct)
After /latex resolves errors, address remaining warnings (which autofix does not fix):
- Parse
out/*.logfor overfull/underfull hbox/vbox warnings - Fix every single one — adjust text, resize figures, tweak
\parbox, etc. - Recompile
- Repeat until the log is clean
"Compilation success does not mean visual success." Also check for silent visual errors:
- TikZ: shape constraints forcing label misplacement, coordinate misalignment. If the deck contains TikZ diagrams, run the 6-pass verification from
../shared/tikz-rules.md— compute Bezier depths, check gaps, verify label fit, check shape boundary clearance. - matplotlib/ggplot: axis labels cut off, legend obscuring data, text sizing. If figures use curved arrows (
arc3), compute Bézier positions using the helper functions in../shared/tikz-rules.md§ Matplotlib Extension — never guess where curves pass. Check label-to-shape clearance (Boundary Rule) and use anchor-based centering for text pairs. - PDF visual inspection: Run
uv run python scripts/pdf-to-images.py <deck>.pdfto convert pages to images, then inspect each image for text overflow, element overlap, font readability, and alignment issues that are invisible in the log
Phase 5: Rhetoric Review (Sub-Agent — Explore)
Launch a sub-agent to review the .tex file against 7 criteria: narrative arc, MB/MC balance, title quality, one-idea-per-slide, transitions, Aristotelian balance, and pyramid principle.
Full prompt template: references/review-prompts.md § Rhetoric Review
Phase 6: Graphics Review (Sub-Agent — Explore)
Launch in parallel with Phase 5. Reviews TikZ diagrams, figure sizing, table formatting, colour consistency, typography, and numerical accuracy.
Full prompt template: references/review-prompts.md § Graphics Review
Phase 7: Apply and Finalise (Direct)
- Read both reviewer reports
- Incorporate feedback — prioritise Critical and Needs Work items
- Recompile
- Verify zero warnings in the log
- If using a
.bibfile: validate all\cite{}keys resolve correctly (check log forCitation .* undefined). See/bib-validatefor the full cross-referencing protocol. - If significant changes were made, loop back to Phase 5 for another review round
- Compute quality score — read
references/quality-rubric.md, log all issues from Phases 4-6, compute score and verdict - Confirm final PDF is in the source directory (copied from
out/by.latexmkrc)
Reference Palettes
Three starting palettes (Professional, Energetic, Academic) in both LaTeX and CSS formats: ../shared/palettes.md
Use as inspiration — always create an original palette for each deck.
Output Checklist
A completed deck directory should contain:
project/
├── deck.tex # Main Beamer file (uses user-beamer.sty)
├── deck.pdf # Compiled PDF (copied from out/ by .latexmkrc)
├── .latexmkrc # Output directory config
├── out/ # Build artifacts only
├── figures/ # Generated figures (if any)
│ ├── figure_1.png
│ └── ...
├── scripts/ # R/Python scripts that generated figures (if any)
│ ├── figure_1.R
│ └── ...
└── references.bib # Bibliography (if citations used)
- PDF compiles with zero warnings
- All frame titles are assertions
- One idea per slide
- Narrative arc: Problem → Investigation → Resolution
- Rhetoric review completed (Phase 5)
- Graphics review completed (Phase 6)
- If
.bibused: all\cite{}keys validated (see/bib-validate) - Quality score computed and reported
Cross-References
| Skill | When to use instead/alongside |
|---|---|
/project-deck | For project status updates (supervisor meetings, coauthor handoffs) |
/latex | Default compiler — used in Phase 3 for error resolution and citation audit |
/latex | For manual compilation config details, .latexmkrc setup, engine selection |
/proofread | For post-hoc review of text quality in the deck |
/bib-validate | For thorough bibliography cross-referencing when citations are used |
/literature | For finding and verifying citations to include |
/quarto-deck | For HTML presentations (teaching, informal talks) instead of PDF |
/quarto-course | For full course websites with multiple lectures, exercises, and navigation |
Scott's full rhetoric essay: resources/academics/scott-cunningham/MixtapeTools/presentations/rhetoric_of_decks.md
Scott's deck generation prompt: resources/academics/scott-cunningham/MixtapeTools/presentations/create_deck_prompt.md
Scott's example decks: resources/academics/scott-cunningham/MixtapeTools/presentations/examples/