Native agent deliberation
Skill Kbediako/evergreen-codex-skills/skills/native-agent-deliberation
Evergreen, generally useful Codex skills designed to stay valuable as models improve.
npx -y skills add Kbediako/evergreen-codex-skills --skill native-agent-deliberationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 21 days oldThe repository was created 21 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Frame consequential or ambiguous decisions through distinct evidence-backed viewpoints, tradeoffs, and dissent. Use for brainstorming among competing strategies, architecture choices, risk review, or a decision whose assumptions should be challenged before execution.
SKILL.md
2.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Native Agent Deliberation
Set The Decision
- State one decision question.
- List hard constraints, success criteria, and decision deadline.
- Separate known evidence from assumptions.
- Identify what would change the decision.
- Keep implementation outside scope unless the user also authorizes it.
Gather Viewpoints
Load native-subagents-first before using native agents. Follow it as the sole lifecycle, model, budget, resume, and tool contract.
Choose two to four genuinely distinct viewpoints, such as:
- evidence and constraints,
- viable options and tradeoffs,
- dissent and failure modes,
- reversibility and verification.
Give each viewpoint a bounded question and only the evidence it needs. Ask for:
- a concise recommendation,
- supporting evidence,
- the strongest counterargument,
- confidence and missing facts,
- a condition that would reverse the recommendation.
Use the tool's structured role controls when needed. Do not put role or agent_type markers in prompt text.
Synthesize
- Verify material claims against source evidence.
- Compare options against the same criteria.
- Preserve disagreements instead of manufacturing consensus.
- Distinguish evidence, inference, and preference.
- Recommend one path, defer, or ask for one blocking fact.
- Name the strongest dissent and what would change the decision.
- Give the next concrete action without starting unrequested implementation.
Return
- Decision and recommendation.
- Evidence that drove it.
- Strongest tradeoff or dissent.
- Uncertainty and reversal condition.
- Next action.
Do not use this skill for generic subagent execution, routine implementation fanout, or validation.