Lit review

Skill k3nnethfrancis/agent-utils/skills/lit-review

Structured literature review workflow. Use when the user asks to "do a lit review", "review this paper", "triage these papers", "compare papers", or mentions arXiv, research papers, or academic literature.From its SKILL.md

Install

npx -y skills add k3nnethfrancis/agent-utils --skill lit-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

SKILL.md

3.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Literature Review

Structured capture of research papers for a knowledge base. Reviews enable conceptual reconstruction of studies and synthesis across the field.

Modes

Triage

Quick 2-3 sentence summary for go/no-go decisions. Use when screening multiple papers.

Format: Title, authors, venue -> what it claims -> why it might matter (or not).

Full Review

Comprehensive structured capture. Default mode when asked to "review" or "do a lit review."

See references/review-template.md for full structure.

Compare

Pull scores across multiple reviews for synthesis. Use when asked to compare papers or do meta-analysis.

Generate comparison table from frontmatter fields, then narrative synthesis of patterns.

Full Review Workflow

Fetch the paper - Use WebFetch for arXiv HTML, WebSearch for finding papers, or read from provided PDF/URL
Extract metadata - Authors, venue, date, arXiv ID, paper type
Identify core contribution - Problem statement, key claim, key insight
Map the architecture - Components, mechanisms, design decisions with rationale
Assess evaluation - Setup, key results, ablations, failure modes (high-level)
Critical analysis - Stated limitations, our critiques, methodological concerns
Score analysis dimensions - Apply rubric from references/cybernetic-rubric.md
Connect to research goals - How does this relate to your research questions?
Flag open questions - What's left unanswered?

Weave quotable passages inline where they strengthen other sections.

Output Format

Hybrid: YAML frontmatter (structured, queryable) + markdown prose (nuanced analysis).

---
title: "Paper Title"
authors: [Author One, Author Two]
venue: Conference/Journal Name
date: YYYY-MM-DD
arxiv: "XXXX.XXXXX"
paper_type: empirical | theoretical | system | survey | benchmark
tags: [tag1, tag2]
cybernetics:
  feedback_loops: true | false | partial
  learning_level: 0 | I | II | III
  requisite_variety: true | false | partial
  self_regulation: true | false | partial
  human_in_loop: explicit | implicit | none
---

Key Principles

Conceptual reconstruction: Capture enough to design something similar, not to replicate exactly
Research memory: This extends beyond training knowledge - be thorough on recent work
Compression for synthesis: These get combined into meta-analyses - make them comparable
Analysis lens: Always assess control-relevant dimensions

Gotchas

Empty — add failure modes here as they're discovered in real use.

Additional Resources

Reference Files

references/review-template.md - Full review structure with section guidance
references/cybernetic-rubric.md - Scoring rubric with analysis dimensions

Examples

examples/saga-review.md - Complete review demonstrating the format