Labview to python industrial
Skill k-telux/Labview2Python/skills/labview-to-python-industrial
Evidence-gated Agent Skill for migrating LabVIEW measurement software to Python with simulator, UI, hardware, data-parity, and EXE proof.
npx -y skills add k-telux/Labview2Python --skill labview-to-python-industrialAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Industrial workflow for converting, auditing, optimizing, or packaging LabVIEW measurement VIs as Python applications. Use for LabVIEW to Python, LabVIEW-to-Python, LabVIEW转Python, VI migration, pump-probe or laboratory control software, PyQt/PySide industrial UI, hardware driver and SDK migration, simulator/data parity, performance regressions, screenshot UI review, supervisory gatekeeping, or Windows EXE delivery.
SKILL.md
4.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
LabVIEW To Python Industrial
Treat a migration as an evidence-controlled replacement of an experiment, not a front-panel rewrite. Preserve measurement semantics first; optimize UI and packaging only after the preceding gate is approved.
Establish Scope
- State the role: implement, review/supervise, or package/verify only.
- Record the writable subtree. Do not cross it or terminate unrelated processes.
- Freeze the canonical VI, subVIs, type definitions, front-panel images, known outputs, vendor SDK versions, and one known-good run when available.
- Separate verdicts for
inventory,simulator,source UI,packaged EXE,real hardware, and any unresolved subsystem such as phase/chopper control. - Reuse existing workflow, adapters, verifier, and packaging scripts before creating another framework.
Load The Right Reference
- Migration, parity inventory, scan plans, and saving:
references/workflow.md - Hardware, SDK manifests, safety, and EXE lineage:
references/hardware-packaging.md - UI design and screenshot acceptance:
references/ui-qa.md - Performance, heatmaps, plots, and anti-self-proof checks:
references/performance-data-parity.md - Multi-project supervision and phase gates:
references/supervision-gates.md - Pump-probe lessons from real migrations:
references/case-study-pumpprobe.md - Chinese operator summary:
references/i18n/zh-CN.md - Japanese operator summary:
references/i18n/ja-JP.md
Use One Runtime Core
Keep one state machine for initialization, scan planning, acquisition, pause, resume, stop, saving, and cleanup. Both real and simulated adapters must execute through it. UI callbacks render and command that workflow; they do not copy it.
Require each adapter to expose status, initialize, the commands used by the VI, and fail-closed cleanup. A simulator must preserve shapes, axes, units, metadata, event order, and save formats, including deterministic failure profiles.
Enforce Gates In Order
- Inventory: map every control, default, unit, limit, property node, event, driver call, save field, error path, and shutdown path.
- Logic/data: prove the resolved scan plan, hardware call order, conversion, processing, partial-stop behavior, and persisted outputs.
- Simulator: run normal, boundary, timeout, failed init/acquire/save/cleanup, pause/resume, and partial stop through the production workflow.
- Source UI: use real clicks, typing, combo opening, scrolling, mouse hover, and screenshots at normal and constrained resolutions.
- Packaged EXE: rebuild from the approved source, prove source/build/hash lineage, then repeat critical runtime scenarios from the distributable.
- Real hardware: remain
unvalidated_blockeduntil an operator-approved, fail-closed dry run is performed on the actual devices.
Do not enter the next gate without explicit evidence that the previous gate is approved. Do not reuse stale screenshots or old binaries after relevant source or verifier changes.
Reject Invalid Proof
- A target CSV injected into a simulator and reconstructed is a
target_derived_roundtrip_simulator_fixture, not independent LabVIEW algorithm parity. - A verifier comparing a target array with itself, searching source strings, or calling a hover setter is self-proof and must fail.
- A process launch, a nonblank window, JSON
passed=true, or a test count of zero is not sufficient runtime evidence. - A quick preview with reduced points cannot prove full-resolution parity.
- An in-memory comparison cannot prove saved-file or displayed-image parity.
- Simulator success cannot prove vendor driver or real hardware compatibility.
Produce Evidence
For each accepted gate, record commands, runtime versions, source and verifier hashes, profile/axes/shapes, semantic event counts, wall-clock timings, output readback, screenshots, and unresolved blockers. Use fresh non-destructive artifact directories and preserve failed gates as diagnostics.
End with exact labels such as:
source_ui_verifiedsimulator_verifiedpackaged_exe_verifiedreal_hardware_unvalidated_blockedindependent_labview_algorithm_parity_blocked_no_raw_fixture
If required evidence is absent, report incomplete or blocked_unverified.